背景与目的5-氟尿嘧啶/左亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂(5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin,FOLFOX)方案是转移性结直肠癌(metastatic colorectal cancer,mCRC)的标准一线治疗方案,但KRAS野生型mCRC患者的最佳二线治疗方案仍在研究中...背景与目的5-氟尿嘧啶/左亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂(5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin,FOLFOX)方案是转移性结直肠癌(metastatic colorectal cancer,mCRC)的标准一线治疗方案,但KRAS野生型mCRC患者的最佳二线治疗方案仍在研究中。在本研究中,我们旨在探索CMAB009联合伊立替康二线治疗KRAS野生型mCRC患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法将FOLFOX治疗失败的KRAS野生型mCRC患者按照2∶1比例随机分组,接受CMAB009联合伊立替康或伊立替康单药治疗。伊立替康单药治疗的患者在疾病进展时可转为CMAB009治疗,分为CMAB009序贯治疗组。主要终点为总缓解率(overall response rate,ORR)和中位无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)。次要终点为中位总生存期(overall survival,OS)、疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)、临床获益率(clinical benefit rate,CBR)和缓解持续时间(duration of response,DOR)。结果CMAB009联合伊立替康治疗组与伊立替康单药治疗组相比,ORR显著提高(33.2%vs.12.8%;P<0.001),中位PFS延长(169 d vs.95 d;P<0.001),DCR(80.1%vs.65.2%,P<0.001)、CBR(30.0%vs.14.6%,P<0.001)和DOR(210 d vs.109 d;P<0.001)均有所改善。然而,接受CMAB009治疗的患者出现皮疹(66.9%vs.5.5%,P<0.001)和甲沟炎(9.8%vs.0.0%,P<0.001)的风险增加。3.6%的患者检测出抗药抗体(antidrug antibodies,ADA),接受CMAB009治疗的患者中仅有0.9%出现过敏反应。伊立替康治疗失败后CMAB009序贯治疗患者的中位PFS为84 d(95%CI:65–113 d)。CMAB009联合伊立替康治疗患者的中位OS为425 d,而CMAB009序贯治疗组患者的中位OS为401 d(P=0.940)。结论对于KRAS野生型mCRC患者,CMAB009联合伊立替康的二线治疗方案优于伊立替康单药治疗方案。此外,伊立替康单药二线治疗失败改用CMAB009序贯治疗可作为一种有效的三线治疗方案。临床实验注册号:NCT01550055,回顾性注册于2012年3月9日。展开更多
Background:The 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin(FOLFOX)regimen is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC),however,the optimal second-line regimen for KRAS wild-type mCRC pati...Background:The 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin(FOLFOX)regimen is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC),however,the optimal second-line regimen for KRAS wild-type mCRC patients is still investigational.In this study,we aimed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of CMAB009 plus irinotecan compared to irinotecan-only as a second-line regimen for treating KRAS wild-type mCRC patients.Methods:Patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who had previously failed to respond to FOLFOX treatment were ran-domly assigned in a 2:1 ratio,to receive CMAB009 plus irinotecan or irinotecan-only.Patients receiving irinotecan-only were permitted to switch to CMAB009 therapy on disease progression and were grouped as the sequential-CMAB009 arm.The primary endpoints were overall response rate(ORR)and median progression-free survival(PFS).The second-ary endpoints were median overall survival(OS),disease control rate(DCR),clinical benefit rate(CBR),and duration of response(DOR).Results:The CMAB009 plus irinotecan arm demonstrated significantly improved ORR(33.2%vs.12.8%;P<0.001)and longer median PFS(169 days vs.95 days;P<0.001)as compared to the irinotecan-only arm.Patients receiv-ing CMAB009 plus irinotecan also demonstrated improved DCR(80.1%vs.65.2%,P<0.001),CBR(30.0%vs.14.6%,P<0.001),and DOR(210 days vs.109 days;P<0.001)as compared to irinotecan-only.However,patients treated with CMAB009 had an increased risk of skin rash(66.9%vs.5.5%,P<0.001)and paronychia(9.8%vs.0.0%,P<0.001).Anti-drug antibodies(ADA)were detected in 3.6%of patients,and only 0.9%of patients who received CMAB009 experienced hypersensitivity reactions.In patients receiving sequential-CMAB009 therapy after failure with irinotecan,their median PFS was 84 days (95% CI 65 to 113 days). The median OS was 425 days for patients receiving CMAB009 plus irinotecan and 401 days for those with sequential-CMAB009 (P = 0.940). Conclusions: Treatment with CMAB009 plus irinotecan was found to be a superior second-line regimen in com-parison to irinotecan-only in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients. Further, switching to CMAB009 can be considered as an efficient third-line of treatment after treatment failure with second-line irinotecan-only. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01550055, retrospectively registered on March 9, 2012.展开更多
基金Shanghai Zhangjiang Biotechnology Co.,Ltd.initiated and support this studyThis work was also supported by the Chinese National Major Project for New Drug Innovation(2012ZX09101103,2013ZX09101002-001-001,and 2008ZX09312)
文摘Background:The 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin(FOLFOX)regimen is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC),however,the optimal second-line regimen for KRAS wild-type mCRC patients is still investigational.In this study,we aimed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of CMAB009 plus irinotecan compared to irinotecan-only as a second-line regimen for treating KRAS wild-type mCRC patients.Methods:Patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who had previously failed to respond to FOLFOX treatment were ran-domly assigned in a 2:1 ratio,to receive CMAB009 plus irinotecan or irinotecan-only.Patients receiving irinotecan-only were permitted to switch to CMAB009 therapy on disease progression and were grouped as the sequential-CMAB009 arm.The primary endpoints were overall response rate(ORR)and median progression-free survival(PFS).The second-ary endpoints were median overall survival(OS),disease control rate(DCR),clinical benefit rate(CBR),and duration of response(DOR).Results:The CMAB009 plus irinotecan arm demonstrated significantly improved ORR(33.2%vs.12.8%;P<0.001)and longer median PFS(169 days vs.95 days;P<0.001)as compared to the irinotecan-only arm.Patients receiv-ing CMAB009 plus irinotecan also demonstrated improved DCR(80.1%vs.65.2%,P<0.001),CBR(30.0%vs.14.6%,P<0.001),and DOR(210 days vs.109 days;P<0.001)as compared to irinotecan-only.However,patients treated with CMAB009 had an increased risk of skin rash(66.9%vs.5.5%,P<0.001)and paronychia(9.8%vs.0.0%,P<0.001).Anti-drug antibodies(ADA)were detected in 3.6%of patients,and only 0.9%of patients who received CMAB009 experienced hypersensitivity reactions.In patients receiving sequential-CMAB009 therapy after failure with irinotecan,their median PFS was 84 days (95% CI 65 to 113 days). The median OS was 425 days for patients receiving CMAB009 plus irinotecan and 401 days for those with sequential-CMAB009 (P = 0.940). Conclusions: Treatment with CMAB009 plus irinotecan was found to be a superior second-line regimen in com-parison to irinotecan-only in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients. Further, switching to CMAB009 can be considered as an efficient third-line of treatment after treatment failure with second-line irinotecan-only. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01550055, retrospectively registered on March 9, 2012.