Review on article of effects of tenofovir alafenamide and entecavir in chronic hepatitis B virus patients

This letter comments on the article which reported that tenofovir alafenamide may increase blood lipid levels compared with entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B published on World J Hepatol 2023 August 27.We review the related research content,topic selection,methodology,conclusions,strengths and weaknesses of this article.And evaluate it in relation to other published relevant articles.

Baseline metabolites could predict responders with hepatitis B virus-related liver fibrosis for entecavir or combined with FuzhengHuayu tablet

BACKGROUND After receiving entecavir or combined with FuzhengHuayu tablet(FZHY)treatment,some sufferers with hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related liver fibrosis could achieve a histological improvement while the others may fail to improve even worsen.Serum metabolomics at baseline in these patients who were effective in treatment remain unclear.AIM To explore baseline serum metabolites characteristics in responders.METHODS A total of 132 patients with HBV-related liver fibrosis and 18 volunteers as healthy controls were recruited.First,all subjects were divided into training set and validation set.Second,the included patients were subdivided into entecavir responders(E-R),entecavir no-responders(E-N),FZHY+entecavir responders(FR),and FZHY+entecavir no-responders(F-N)following the pathological histological changes after 48 wk’treatments.Then,Serum samples of all subjects before treatment were tested by high performance liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry(LC-MS)high-performance LC-MS.Data processing was conducted using multivariate principal component analysis and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis.Diagnostic tests of selected differential metabolites were used for Boruta analyses and logistic regression.RESULTS As for the intersection about differential metabolic pathways between the groups E-R vs E-N and F-R vs F-N,results showed that 4 pathways including linoleic acid metabolism,aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis,cyanoamino acid metabolism,alanine,aspartate and glutamate metabolism were screened out.As for the differential metabolites,these 7 intersected metabolites including hydroxypropionic acid,tyrosine,citric acid,taurochenodeoxycholic acid,benzoic acid,2-Furoic acid,and propionic acid were selected.CONCLUSION Our findings showed that 4 metabolic pathways and 7 differential metabolites had potential usefulness in clinical prediction of the response of entecavir or combined with FZHY on HBV fibrotic liver.

Tenofovir alafenamide significantly increased serum lipid levels compared with entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitis B virus patients

BACKGROUND Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)has a serum lipid-raising effect in patients with HIV;however,its effect on serum lipids and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB)is unclear.AIM To compare the effects of TAF and entecavir(ETV)on serum lipid levels in patients with CHB.METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,the data including the clinical features,serum lipids,and metabolic factors of patients with CHB at baseline and approximately 1 year after TAF or ETV treatment were collected and analyzed.We used propensity score-matched models to assess the effects on high-density lipoprotein,lowdensity lipoprotein,triglycerides,and total cholesterol(TCHO).RESULTS A total of 336 patients(75.60%male)were included;63.69%received TAF and 36.31%received ETV.Compared with the ETV group,the TAF group had significantly higher TCHO levels after treatment(4.67±0.90 vs 4.36±1.05,P=0.006).In a propensity score-matched model for body mass index,age,sex,smoking,drinking,presence of comorbidities such as NAFLD,cirrhosis,diabetes mellitus,and hypertension,TAF-treated patients had significantly increased TCHO levels compared to that at baseline(P=0.019).There was no difference for the ETV group.Body mass index,sex,hypertension,baseline TCHO,and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme levels were significantly associated with elevated TCHO levels in logistic regression analysis.However,1-year TAF treatment did not increase the incidence of NAFLD.CONCLUSION A greater increase in TCHO was observed in patients with CHB receiving TAF compared to those receiving ETV.However,TAF-induced dyslipidemia did not increase the incidence of NAFLD.

Robust Export of China-Made Auto Parts and Accessories

As the basis of automobile industry,auto parts are the necessary factors for sup- porting the automobile industry to develop continuously and healthily.Especially now when the independent development and innovation of automobile industry is developing vigorously

Clinical Efficacy and Incidence of Adverse Reactions of Entecavir Combined with Long-Acting Interferon in Treating Hepatitis B

Objective:To explore and analyze the clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions of entecavir combined with long-acting interferon in treating hepatitis B.Methods:The study was conducted from January 2020 to December 2022,and the research subjects were 69 hepatitis B patients admitted to our hospital.The patients were divided into a research group(n=35)and a control group(n=34).Patients in the control group were treated with entecavir,while patients in the study group were treated with entecavir combined with long-acting interferon.The antiviral efficacy,liver function indicators,clinical effectiveness,and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:The HBV-DNA negative conversion rate and HBeAg seroconversion rate of the patients in the study group were higher than those of the control group,and the virological breakthrough rate was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05);the alanine transaminase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),and total bilirubin(TBIL)levels of the patients in the study group were all lower after treatment.In the control group,the albumin(ALB)level was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The clinical effective rate of patients in the study group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The treatment effect of entecavir combined with long-acting interferon in patients with hepatitis B is significant.It can effectively antiviral and improve the liver function of patients.The incidence of adverse reactions is low and can be promoted and applied.

The Future of China-made Cellular Phones

IN1999,forthefirsttime,Chinesecompaniesbeganproducingtheirowncellularphones.Tohelpdevelopthenewindustry,theMinistryoftheInformationindustryhaspromulgatedaseriesofpreferentialpolicies.Beginningin1999,theministrydecidedtoearmark5percentoftheannualtelep...

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B exhibiting suboptimal response to entecavir

BACKGROUND Entecavir(ETV)is a potent and safe antiviral agent for patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB);however,some patients may exhibit suboptimal response or resistance to ETV.Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)is a novel tenofovir prodrug with improved pharmacokinetics and reduced renal and bone toxicity compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from ETV to TAF in patients with CHB exhibiting suboptimal response to ETV.METHODS A total of 60 patients with CHB who had been treated with ETV for at least 12 mo and had persistent or recurrent viremia[Hepatitis B virus(HBV)DNA≥20 IU/mL]or partial virologic response(HBV DNA<20 IU/mL,but detectable)were enrolled in the study.The patients were randomly assigned to either continue ETV(0.5 mg)daily or switch to TAF(25 mg)daily for 48 wk.The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response(HBV DNA level<20 IU/mL)at week 48.Secondary endpoints included changes in serum alanine aminotransferase(ALT),hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg),hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg),and anti-HBe levels,and renal and bone safety parameters.RESULTS At week 48,the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response was significantly higher in the TAF group than in the ETV group(93.3%vs 66.7%,P=0.012).The mean reduction in HBV DNA from baseline was also significantly greater in the TAF group than in the ETV group(-3.8 vs-2.4 Log10 IU/mL,P<0.001).The rates of ALT normalization,HBeAg loss,HBeAg seroconversion,and HBsAg loss were not found to significantly differ between the two groups.None of the patients developed genotypic resistance to ETV or TAF.Both drugs were well tolerated,with no serious adverse events or discontinuations caused by adverse events.No significant changes were observed in the estimated glomerular filtration rate,serum creatinine level,or urine protein-to-creatinine ratio in either group.The TAF group had a significantly lower decrease in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip than the ETV group(-0.8%vs-2.1%,P=0.004;-0.6%vs-1.8%,P=0.007,respectively).CONCLUSION Switching from ETV to TAF is effective and safe for patients with CHB exhibiting a suboptimal response to ETV and may prevent further viral resistance and reduce renal and bone toxicity.

Network meta-analysis of the compensatory effect of different Chinese herbal compounds combined with Entecavir in the treatment of hepatitis B cirrhosis

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different Chinese herbal compounds combined with Entecavir in the treatment of hepatitis B cirrhosis during the compensatory period by using mesh meta-analysis.Methods:PubMed,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP databases were searched by computer,and the retrieval time was from the establishment of each database to October 5,2022.According to inclusion and exclusion criteria,literature search was conducted independently by two researchers.RevMan5.4.1 software provided by Cochrane was used for evaluation,and Stata16.0 software was used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 34 RCTs were included,involving 16 TCM compounds and 1543 patients.The results of network meta-analysis showed that ALT indexes of liver function were listed as Yiqi Jiedu Tongluo Method>Luoshugan Tablet>Anluo Huaxian Wan>Qishenrugan Capsule>Qingganhuaji Decoction>Ganshuang Granules>Compound Biejia Rugan Tablet>Rougan Sanjie Decoction>Shugan Jianpi Decoction>Shenqi Fuzheng Huayu Decoction>Peituhua Decoction>Shugan Jianpi Huoxu prescription>Rhubarb Zhezhan Capsule combined with Entecavir treatment respectively;The order of HA index of liver fibrosis was Heluo Shugan Tablet>Shugan Jianpi Huoxui prescription>Anluo Huaxian Wan>Compound Biejia Ruangan Tablet>Rougan Sanjie Decoction>Ganshuang Granules>Danji Huoxui Decoction>Yiqi Jiedu Tongluo Method>Rhubarb Zhezhe Capsule>Fuzheng Huayu Table>Shugan Jianpi Decoction>Rougan Huayu Decoction>Peitu Huayu Decoction>Qingganhuaji Prescription>Shenqi Fuzheng Huayu prescription combined with Entecavir respectively;In order of adverse reactions from best to worst,Shuganjianpi Decoction,Qishenrugangan Capsule,Ganshuang Granules,Peituhuazhi Decoction,compound Biejiruganpian,and He Shugan Pian combined with entecavir,respectively;The effective rate of treatment was listed as Ganshuang Granules>Compound Biejia Ruangan Tablets>uoshugan Tablets>Rougansanjie Decoction>Rhubarb Zhezhe Capsules>Yiqi Jiedu Tongluo Method>Qingganhuaji prescription>Anluo Huaxia Wan>Shugan Jianpi Decoction>Fuzheng Huayu tablets>Peituhuazhi Decoction>Shenqi Fuzheng Huayu prescription combined with Entecavir respectively.Conclusion:Entecavir combined with supplementing qi and detoxifying and dredging collages is the best method to recover ALT index of liver function during the compensation period for hepatitis B cirrhosis;Entecavir combination and Luoshugan tablet were the best treatment for HA index of hepatic fibrosis;Entecavir combined with Shuganjianpi Decoction was the best treatment for adverse reactions;The best treatment efficiency was Entecavir combined with Ganshuang granules.

富马酸替诺福韦与恩替卡韦挽救治疗拉米夫定耐药的HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效分析

目的探讨应用富马酸替诺福韦(TDF)与恩替卡韦(ETV)挽救治疗拉米夫定耐药的血清HBeAg阴性的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的临床疗效,并分析影响临床疗效的因素。方法2017年1月~2021年12月我院收治的拉米夫定治疗耐药的血清HBeAg阴性的CHB患者50例,被随机分为TDF治疗组25例和ETV治疗组25例,前者常规剂量应用,后者加倍应用。两组均治疗48周,监测疗效。应用二分类变量的Logistic回归分析影响病毒学应答的因素。结果在治疗4周、12周、24周、36周和48周时,TDF治疗组血清HBV DNA累积转阴率分别为32%、60%、72%、80%和92%,显著高于ETV治疗组(分别为4%、24%、32%、40%和44%,均P<0.05);TDF治疗组血清ALT复常率分别为56%、68%、80%、84%和96%,与显著高于ETV治疗组(分别为16%、32%、52%、56%和72%,均P<0.05);在治疗48周时,TDF治疗组血清肌酐水平显著高于治疗前(85.4±13.9μmol/L对76.2±17.5μmol/L,P=0.0001),而ETV治疗组治疗前后血清肌酐水平无显著变化(76.6±12.9μmol/L对77.3±11.2μmol/L,P=0.769);Logistic回归分析显示,应用TDF治疗和血清HBV DNA载量为影响血清HBV DNA转阴的独立预测因素。结论TDF挽救治疗拉米夫定耐药的CHB患者可能获得更好的疗效,但需要密切监测肾功能的变化。

血府逐瘀汤联合恩替卡韦治疗瘀血阻络型乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者的临床效果

目的 探讨血府逐瘀汤联合恩替卡韦治疗瘀血阻络型乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者的临床效果。方法 选取80例瘀血阻络型乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。给予观察组血府逐瘀汤联合恩替卡韦治疗,给予对照组恩替卡韦治疗,疗程均为24周。比较两组患者治疗前后失代偿期肝硬化发生率,HBV-DNA载量、肝功能[ALT、AST、总胆红素(TBIL)]、血清炎症因子[肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-22]、肝脏超声相关指标(门静脉主干内径、脾静脉内径、脾脏厚度、脾脏长度)、中医证候积分和中医证候疗效的变化情况,以及治疗期间不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗后12周、治疗后24周,两组患者失代偿期肝硬化发生率及门静脉主干内径、脾静脉内径、脾脏厚度、脾脏长度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者的血清ALT、AST、TBIL、TNF-α、IL-6、IL-22水平,以及HBV-DNA载量、中医证候积分随治疗时间延长而降低,且治疗后12周、治疗后24周,观察组的上述指标均低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组的中医证候疗效的总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗期间两组患者的不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 血府逐瘀汤联合恩替卡韦治疗瘀血阻络型乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者的临床疗效优于单纯恩替卡韦治疗,可有效降低炎症细胞因子的表达水平,改善肝功能,且安全性较好。

富马酸丙酚替诺福韦与恩替卡韦治疗高血清病毒载量的代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者效果比较研究

目的分析比较富马酸丙酚替诺福韦与恩替卡韦治疗高血清病毒载量的代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效。方法2020年1月~2023年1月我院收治的64例高血清病毒载量(HBVDNA为1×106 IU/mL或以上)的代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者,被随机分为对照组32例和观察组32例,分别给予恩替卡韦和富马酸丙酚替诺福韦治疗,连续治疗观察12个月。使用高效液相色谱分析法检测尿液乳果糖/甘露醇(L/M)比值,采用比色法检测血清D-乳酸,采用紫外比色法检测血清二胺氧化酶(DAO),采用ELISA法检测血清内霉素和白细胞介素-7(IL-7),采用化学发光免疫分析法检测血清降钙素原(PCT),采用免疫荧光定量法检测肝素结合蛋白(HBP)。结果在观察治疗12个月末,两组均获得病毒学和生化学应答,两组血清TBIL、ALT和AST水平无显著性相差(P>0.05);观察组血清DAO、D-乳酸、内霉素和尿L/M比值分别为(2.8±0.6)U/mL、(7.9±1.8)μg/mL、(0.5±0.1)EU/mL和(7.3±1.6)%,与对照组【分别为(3.0±0.5)U/mL、(7.8±2.2)μg/mL、(0.6±0.1)EU/mL和(8.1±1.9)%,P>0.05】比,无显著性差异;观察组血清PCT、HBP和IL-7水平分别为(0.01±0.00)μg/L、(43.1±3.7)ng/mL和(768.9±20.3)pg/mL,与对照组【分别为(0.02±0.01)μg/L、(47.6±3.2)ng/mL和(743.4±21.5)pg/mL,P>0.05】比,无显著性差异。结论应用富马酸丙酚替诺福韦或恩替卡韦治疗高血清病毒载量的代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效肯定,对肠道屏障功能无明显的影响。

恩替卡韦治疗后慢性乙型肝炎低病毒血症患者序贯联合艾米替诺福韦治疗的效果研究

目的 探讨在恩替卡韦(ETV)治疗后出现低病毒血症(LLV)的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者,采取序贯联合艾米替诺福韦(TMF)治疗的临床效果。方法 选取2021年7月—2023年1月在贵港市人民医院感染科经ETV抗病毒治疗的CHB患者200例。根据治疗期间HBV DNA水平,将患者分为完全病毒学应答组(64例)和LLV组(136例),分析两组临床资料。根据LLV组抗病毒治疗方案,分为3组:续用ETV为对照组(40例)、换用TMF为序贯组(45例)、ETV联合TMF为联合组(51例),持续治疗48周。比较3组治疗48周时HBV DNA转阴率、乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)、E抗原(HBeAg)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、肌酐(Cr)和肝硬度测定值(LSM)及不良反应发生率。结果 完全病毒学应答组HBeAg阳性率、HBV DNA、PLT、LSM、ALT、AST均低于LLV组(P <0.05)。治疗24周后,完全病毒学应答组Cr、AST、HBeAg阳性率、HBV DNA、PLT均低于LLV组(P <0.05)。治疗48周后,联合组Cr低于对照组和序贯组(P <0.05),HBsAg高于对照组和序贯组(P <0.05);序贯组ALT、AST均低于对照组(P <0.05);序贯组和联合组HBeAg转阴率、HBV DNA转阴率、PLT均高于对照组(P <0.05),LSM低于对照组(P <0.05)。对照组、序贯组、联合组不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 序贯或联合TMF治疗能更有效地提高ETV治疗后LLV患者完全病毒学应答率,并改善患者肝肾功能,减轻肝纤维化程度。

恩替卡韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素-α2b治疗代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效研究

目的探讨应用恩替卡韦(ETV)联合聚乙二醇干扰素-α2b(Peg-IFN-α2b)治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化患者的近期疗效。方法2019年3月~2021年3月安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院诊治的代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者78例,被随机分为对照组40例和观察组38例,分别给予ETV或ETV联合Peg-IFN-α2b治疗24 w,然后两组均继续接受ETV治疗,随访至48 w。常规检测肝功能指标、血清肝纤维化指标、血清HBV标志物定量和HBV DNA载量。结果在随访24 w末,观察组血清白蛋白水平为(45.7±3.2)g/L,显著高于对照组【(38.5±4.3)g/L,P<0.05】;观察组血清IV-C、HA、PⅢP和LN水平分别为(154.3±11.7)μg/L、(130.9±17.5)μg/L、(110.6±16.2)μg/L和(152.7±14.3)μg/L,均显著低于对照组【分别为(200.7±12.4)μg/L、(161.8±18.7)μg/L、(157.4±17.3)μg/L和(200.9±16.3)μg/L,P<0.05】;观察组血清HBsAg水平为1363.8(623.1,2767.6)IU/ml,显著低于对照组【2119.6(1144.9,5094.3)IU/ml,P<0.05】,而血清HBsAg阴转率为15.8%,显著高于对照组的0.0%(P<0.05)。结论联合应用ETV和Peg-IFN-α2b治疗代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者可改善血清肝纤维化指标,提高血清HBsAg阴转率,可能有助于病情恢复。

恩替卡韦、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯及富马酸丙酚替诺福韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效及安全性分析

目的观察恩替卡韦(entecavir,ETV)、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,TDF)及富马酸丙酚替诺福韦(tenofovir alafenamide fumarate,TAF)抗病毒治疗慢性乙型病毒性肝炎(慢乙肝)的临床疗效及安全性。方法选择2021年3月—2023年6月我院收治的181例慢乙肝患者,依据抗病毒治疗用药不同分为3组,ETV组(n=66)、TDF组(n=64)及TAF组(n=51)。比较3组患者的血脂、肝功能、HBsAg、HBV DNA、血肌酐及估算的肾小球滤过率(estimated glomerular filtration rate,eGFR)等指标在治疗前后及组间的差异。结果ETV组有效率为86.36%(57/66),TDF组有效率为90.63%(58/64),TAF组有效率为90.20%(46/51),3组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,3组的HBsAg水平、HBV DNA载量均低于治疗前(P均<0.05),且3组间HBsAg水平、HBV DNA载量的变化幅度比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,3组的ALT、AST水平均低于治疗前(P均<0.05),且3组间ALT、AST水平的变化幅度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,ETV组的HDL-C、LDL-C均高于治疗前(P均<0.05),TC、TG较治疗前差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);TDF组的TC、HDL-C均低于治疗前(P均<0.05),TG、LDL-C较治疗前差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);TAF组的TC、TG、HDL-C、LDL-C较治疗前差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),但3组间TC、TG、HDL-C、LDL-C的变化幅度比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。治疗后,3组的血肌酐、eGFR较治疗前差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),但3组间血肌酐、eGFR的变化幅度比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论ETV、TDF、TAF治疗慢乙肝的临床疗效相近,服用TAF不会对血脂造成影响,但服用ETV会引起HDL-C、LDL-C水平升高,服用TDF可降低TC、HDL-C水平,并且均有较好的肾脏安全性。

苦菜膏联合恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的临床观察

目的探讨苦菜膏联合恩替卡韦治疗肝郁脾虚证慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的临床疗效。方法将陕西省榆林市中医医院肝病科门诊2019年1月—2022年12月治疗的60例肝郁脾虚证慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化患者按照随机数字表法分为2组,每组30例,对照组给予口服恩替卡韦胶囊治疗,每次0.5 mg,每日1次;观察组在对照组用药基础上给予口服中药膏剂苦菜膏治疗,每日2次,每次10 g,疗程均为48周。比较2组治疗前与治疗后血清学肝纤维化指标4项[透明质酸(HA)、IV型胶原(IV-C)、III型前胶原(PC-III)、层连黏连蛋白(LN)]、肝脏功能指标[AST、总胆红素(TBil)、ALT]、肝脏硬度值(LSM)、HBV DNA阴转率、HBeAg阴转率及2组中医症候疗效。结果观察组AST、ALT、TBil、PC-Ⅲ、LN、HA、IV-C水平和LSM值均明显低于对照组(P<0.05),观察组48周HBV DNA的转阴率比对照组高,(P<0.05),与对照组相比观察组HBeAg阴转率没有统计学意义(P>0.05),观察症候积分明显低于对照组(P<0.05),观察组总有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化患者用苦菜膏联合恩替卡韦治疗后的临床症状改善明显,肝脏功能、血清学肝纤维化指标及肝脏硬度值均有所降低,提高了临床疗效。

聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效研究

目的观察比较聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b(Peg-IFN-α)联合恩替卡韦治疗血清HBeAg阳性的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的疗效。方法2019年1月~2022年1月我院收治的279例血清HBeAg阳性的CHB患者,被分为3组,每组93例,分别给予恩替卡韦口服治疗、Peg-IFN-α皮下注射治疗或恩替卡韦联合Peg-IFN-α治疗,均持续治疗48 w,评估疗效。常规检测血清生化学、血清学和病毒学指标。结果在治疗48 w末,联合组HBeAg转阴率和HBeAg血清转换率分别为32.3%和21.5%,Peg-IFN-α治疗组分别为22.6%和15.1%,而恩替卡韦治疗组则无血清HBeAg转阴或HBeAg血清转换者,联合组尚有一些零星的病例发生HBsAg转阴(3.2%)或HBsAg血清转换(2.2%);联合组血清HBsAg和HBeAg水平分别为(1.9±0.3)lg s/co和(0.5±0.1)lg s/co,Peg-IFN-α治疗组分别为(2.2±0.2)lg s/co和(0.6±0.1)lg s/co,均显著低于恩替卡韦治疗组【分别为(3.6±0.2)lg s/co和(1.3±0.2)lg s/co,P<0.05】,而联合组和恩替卡韦治疗组血清HBV DNA载量均显著低于Peg-IFN-α治疗组(P<0.05);联合组血清ALT和AST水平分别为(30.9±4.5)U/L和(28.4±5.3)U/L,恩替卡韦治疗组分别为(31.5±3.6)U/L和(32.3±4.7)U/L,均显著低于Peg-IFN-α治疗组【分别为(48.1±4.2)U/L和(42.7±5.0)U/L,P<0.05】。结论联合应用恩替卡韦和Peg-IFN-α治疗血清HBeAg阳性的CHB患者可能获得更好的血清学转换率,在优势人群可能获得功能性治愈,值得深入研究。

康莱特注射液对乙肝相关性肝癌患者恩替卡韦抗病毒活性作用的影响

目的:探讨康莱特注射液对乙肝相关性肝癌患者恩替卡韦抗病毒活性作用的影响。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月—2022年3月新余钢铁集团有限公司中心医院119例乙肝相关性肝癌患者,根据治疗方法分为两组,分别为联合用药组(n=62)和恩替卡韦组(n=57)。恩替卡韦组给予0.5 mg恩替卡韦胶囊口服治疗,联合用药组在恩替卡韦组的基础上加用康莱特注射液(静脉滴注100 mL)。均治疗6个月。比较两组疗效、凝血功能指标、肝功能指标及不良反应。结果:联合用药组总有效率(87.10%)高于恩替卡韦组(71.93%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组凝血功能指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组凝血功能指标均有所改善,且联合用药组的活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、凝血酶时间(TT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)及血浆纤维蛋白原(FIB)均低于恩替卡韦组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组肝功能指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组肝功能指标均有所改善,且治疗后联合用药组的谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、总胆红素水平(TBIL)、乙肝病毒基因(HBV-DNA)及甲胎蛋白(AFP)均低于恩替卡韦组,而联合用药组的白蛋白(ALB)则高于恩替卡韦组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合用药组的不良反应总发生率(27.42%)高于恩替卡韦组(19.30%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:康莱特注射液联合恩替卡韦能够有效治疗乙肝相关性肝癌患者,有效抑制HBV-DNA,且其血液功能和肝功能指标均能得到有效改善。

肝穿刺活检术评估下不同病情慢性乙型肝炎患者经恩替卡韦治疗的临床疗效

目的 探讨肝穿刺活检术下不同炎症活动度及肝纤维化程度慢性乙型肝炎(Chronic hepatitis B,CHB)患者采用恩替卡韦治疗的临床疗效分析。方法 回顾性分析2015年6月—2020年6月我院收治的80例CHB患者临床资料,患者治疗前均进行肝穿刺活检术,随后接受恩替卡韦治疗48周,比较不同炎症活动度(G1~G4级)与肝纤维化程度(S0~S4期)患者治疗效果及治疗前后肝功能(ALT、AST、TBiL)水平情况。结果 根据病理结果显示,纤维化S0期46例、 S1期19例、S2期7例、S3期7例、S4期1例;炎症活动度患者中G1级45例、G2级24例、G3级11例、G4级0例。不同纤维化与炎症分化程度患者治疗48周时临床总有效率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。重复测量方差分析显示,不同肝组织纤维化患者,肝功能(ALT、AST、TBiL)在时点因素、时点交互因素、组别因素中均有统计学差异(P<0.05);与治疗前比较,治疗后不同肝组织纤维化分级患者肝功能得到显著下降(P<0.05)。不同炎症分化程度患者,ALT指标在时点因素、时点交互因素、组别因素中均有统计学差异(P<0.05);AST、TBiL指标仅在时点因素中有统计学差异(P<0.05);治疗后不同炎症分化程度患者肝功能指标与治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 肝穿刺活检术可了解CHB患者炎症分化程度与纤维化程度,炎症分化程度越高其纤维化程度越高,采用恩替卡韦治疗后炎症分化程度与纤维化程度分级越高患者预后相对较差,但可显著改善肝功能情况。

富马酸丙酚替诺福韦对恩替卡韦治疗后低病毒血症慢性乙型肝炎患者的效果

目的:探究富马酸丙酚替诺福韦对恩替卡韦治疗后低病毒血症慢性乙型肝炎患者的效果。方法:于2019年1月—2022年12月选取惠州市中心人民医院收治的106例低病毒血症慢性乙型肝炎患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为两组,各53例。所有患者均已接受恩替卡韦抗病毒治疗,对照组继续接受恩替卡韦治疗,观察组换用富马酸丙酚替诺福韦治疗,均持续治疗24周。对比两组血清乙型肝炎病毒DNA(hepatitis B virus DNA,HBV-DNA)转阴率、乙型肝炎e抗原(hepatitis B e antigen,HBeAg)阴转率、肝功能、HBV载量、不良反应发生率。结果:治疗24周后,观察组HBV-DNA转阴率为96.23%,HBeAg转阴率为33.96%,均高于对照组的16.98%、13.21%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗前天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)、总胆红素(total bilirubin,TBIL)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)、HBV载量对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组治疗后AST、TBIL、ALT、HBV载量均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为7.55%,与对照组的5.66%比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:富马酸丙酚替诺福韦替换恩替卡韦治疗低病毒血症慢性乙型肝炎患者可提高HBV-DNA、HBeAg阴转率,改善肝功能,降低HBV载量,安全性高。