Previous studies demonstrated that coronary revascularization,especially percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),does not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with...Previous studies demonstrated that coronary revascularization,especially percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),does not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Many studies using myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) showed that,for patients with moderate to severe ischemia,revascularization is the preferred therapy for survival benefit,whereas for patients with no to mild ischemia,medical therapy is the main choice,and revascularization is associated with increased mortality.There is some evidence that revascularization in patients with no or mild ischemia is likely to result in worsened ischemia,which is associated with increased mortality.Studies using fractional flow reserve(FFR) demonstrate that ischemia-guided PCI is superior to angiography-guided PCI,and the presence of ischemia is the key to decisionmaking for PCI.Complementary use of noninvasive MPI and invasive FFR would be important to compensate for each method's limitations.Recent studies of appropriateness criteria showed that,although PCI in the acute setting and coronary bypass surgery are properly performed in most patients,PCI in the non-acute set-ting is often inappropriate,and stress testing to identify myocardial ischemia is performed in less than half of patients.Also,some studies suggested that revascularization in an inappropriate setting is not associated with improved prognosis.Taken together,the presence and the extent of myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease,and coronary revascularization in the absence of myocardial ischemia is associated with worsened prognosis.展开更多
We present a case of a 71-year-old male who hadchest symptoms at rest and during effort. He had felt chest oppression during effort for 1 year,and his chest symptoms had recently worsened. One month before admission h...We present a case of a 71-year-old male who hadchest symptoms at rest and during effort. He had felt chest oppression during effort for 1 year,and his chest symptoms had recently worsened. One month before admission he felt chest squeezing at rest in the early morning. He presented at our institution to evaluate his chest symptoms. Electrocardiography and echocardiography failed to show any specific changes. Because of the possibility that his chest symptoms were due to myocardial ischemia,he was admitted to our institution for coronary angiography(CAG). An initial CAG showed mild atherosclerotic changes in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery(LAD) and mid-segment of the left circumflex coronary artery. Subsequent spasm provocation testing using acetylcholine revealed a bilateral coronary vasospasm,which was relieved after the intracoronary infusion of nitroglycerin. Finally,a CAG showed myocardial bridging(MB) of the mid-distal segments of the LAD. Fractional flow reserve using the intravenous administration of adenosine triphosphate was positive at 0.77,which jumped up to 0.90 through the myocardial bridging segments when the pressure wire was pulled back. Thus,coronary vasospasm and MB might have contributed to his chest symptoms at rest and during effort. Interventional cardiologists should consider the presence of MB as a potential cause of myocardial ischemia.展开更多
Multidetector-row computed tomography(MDCT) has become one of the major tools in diagnosing and evaluating patients with coronary artery disease in recent years.In selected patients,MDCT has been shown to provide more...Multidetector-row computed tomography(MDCT) has become one of the major tools in diagnosing and evaluating patients with coronary artery disease in recent years.In selected patients,MDCT has been shown to provide more reliable accuracy in detection of stent patency than invasive coronary angiography.Chiou et al reported a delicate infarcted myocardium at-risk score.According to their results,the MDCT-based myocardium at-risk score had a good correlation with the thallium 201 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-based summed difference score(r = 0.841,P < 0.001).They claimed that dual-phase MDCT is useful in detecting different patterns of obstructive lesions and the extent of myocardium at risk.In this commentary,we discuss the current status of the clinical application of MDCT in patients with myocardial infarction in relation to evaluating the myocardial perfusion defect,detecting reversible myocardial ischemia,assessing myocardial viability,estimating target lesion restenosis,and calculating of fractional flow reserve from MDCT.展开更多
文摘Previous studies demonstrated that coronary revascularization,especially percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),does not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Many studies using myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) showed that,for patients with moderate to severe ischemia,revascularization is the preferred therapy for survival benefit,whereas for patients with no to mild ischemia,medical therapy is the main choice,and revascularization is associated with increased mortality.There is some evidence that revascularization in patients with no or mild ischemia is likely to result in worsened ischemia,which is associated with increased mortality.Studies using fractional flow reserve(FFR) demonstrate that ischemia-guided PCI is superior to angiography-guided PCI,and the presence of ischemia is the key to decisionmaking for PCI.Complementary use of noninvasive MPI and invasive FFR would be important to compensate for each method's limitations.Recent studies of appropriateness criteria showed that,although PCI in the acute setting and coronary bypass surgery are properly performed in most patients,PCI in the non-acute set-ting is often inappropriate,and stress testing to identify myocardial ischemia is performed in less than half of patients.Also,some studies suggested that revascularization in an inappropriate setting is not associated with improved prognosis.Taken together,the presence and the extent of myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease,and coronary revascularization in the absence of myocardial ischemia is associated with worsened prognosis.
文摘We present a case of a 71-year-old male who hadchest symptoms at rest and during effort. He had felt chest oppression during effort for 1 year,and his chest symptoms had recently worsened. One month before admission he felt chest squeezing at rest in the early morning. He presented at our institution to evaluate his chest symptoms. Electrocardiography and echocardiography failed to show any specific changes. Because of the possibility that his chest symptoms were due to myocardial ischemia,he was admitted to our institution for coronary angiography(CAG). An initial CAG showed mild atherosclerotic changes in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery(LAD) and mid-segment of the left circumflex coronary artery. Subsequent spasm provocation testing using acetylcholine revealed a bilateral coronary vasospasm,which was relieved after the intracoronary infusion of nitroglycerin. Finally,a CAG showed myocardial bridging(MB) of the mid-distal segments of the LAD. Fractional flow reserve using the intravenous administration of adenosine triphosphate was positive at 0.77,which jumped up to 0.90 through the myocardial bridging segments when the pressure wire was pulled back. Thus,coronary vasospasm and MB might have contributed to his chest symptoms at rest and during effort. Interventional cardiologists should consider the presence of MB as a potential cause of myocardial ischemia.
文摘Multidetector-row computed tomography(MDCT) has become one of the major tools in diagnosing and evaluating patients with coronary artery disease in recent years.In selected patients,MDCT has been shown to provide more reliable accuracy in detection of stent patency than invasive coronary angiography.Chiou et al reported a delicate infarcted myocardium at-risk score.According to their results,the MDCT-based myocardium at-risk score had a good correlation with the thallium 201 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-based summed difference score(r = 0.841,P < 0.001).They claimed that dual-phase MDCT is useful in detecting different patterns of obstructive lesions and the extent of myocardium at risk.In this commentary,we discuss the current status of the clinical application of MDCT in patients with myocardial infarction in relation to evaluating the myocardial perfusion defect,detecting reversible myocardial ischemia,assessing myocardial viability,estimating target lesion restenosis,and calculating of fractional flow reserve from MDCT.
