Molecular insights into clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer:Unravelling challenges and future directions

Colorectal cancer(CRC)is a complex disease with diverse etiologies and clinical outcomes.Despite considerable progress in development of CRC therapeutics,challenges remain regarding the diagnosis and management of advanced stage metastatic CRC(mCRC).In particular,the five-year survival rate is very low since mCRC is currently rarely curable.Over the past decade,cancer treatment has significantly improved with the introduction of cancer immunotherapies,specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors.Therapies aimed at blocking immune checkpoints such as PD-1,PD-L1,and CTLA-4 target inhibitory pathways of the immune system,and thereby enhance anti-tumor immunity.These therapies thus have shown promising results in many clinical trials alone or in combination.The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy,either alone or in combination with CRC,have been investigated in several clinical trials.Clinical trials,including KEYNOTE-164 and CheckMate 142,have led to Food and Drug Administration approval of the PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab,respectively,for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair CRC.Unfortunately,these drugs benefit only a small percentage of patients,with the benefits of immunotherapy remaining elusive for the vast majority of CRC patients.To this end,primary and secondary resistance to immunotherapy remains a significant issue,and further research is necessary to optimize the use of immunotherapy in CRC and identify biomarkers to predict the response.This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in CRC.The underlying rationale,challenges faced,and potential future steps to improve the prognosis and enhance the likelihood of successful trials in this field are discussed.

DNA damage response-related immune activation signature predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: from gastrointestinal cancer analysis to pan-cancer validation

Objective: DNA damage response(DDR) deficiency has emerged as a prominent determinant of tumor immunogenicity. This study aimed to construct a DDR-related immune activation(DRIA) signature and evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DRIA signature for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) therapy in gastrointestinal(GI) cancer.Methods: A DRIA signature was established based on two previously reported DNA damage immune response assays. Clinical and gene expression data from two published GI cancer cohorts were used to assess and validate the association between the DRIA score and response to ICI therapy. The predictive accuracy of the DRIA score was validated based on one ICI-treated melanoma and three pan-cancer published cohorts.Results: The DRIA signature includes three genes(CXCL10, IDO1, and IFI44L). In the discovery cancer cohort, DRIA-high patients with gastric cancer achieved a higher response rate to ICI therapy than DRIA-low patients(81.8% vs. 8.8%;P < 0.001), and the predictive accuracy of the DRIA score [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC) = 0.845] was superior to the predictive accuracy of PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and Epstein–Barr virus status. The validation cohort demonstrated that the DRIA score identified responders with microsatellite-stable colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade with radiation therapy. Furthermore, the predictive performance of the DRIA score was shown to be robust through an extended validation in melanoma, urothelial cancer, and pan-cancer.Conclusions: The DRIA signature has superior and robust predictive accuracy for the efficacy of ICI therapy in GI cancer and pancancer, indicating that the DRIA signature may serve as a powerful biomarker for guiding ICI therapy decisions.

Machine learning algorithms able to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND Although immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)have demonstrated significant survival benefits in some patients diagnosed with gastric cancer(GC),existing prognostic markers are not universally applicable to all patients with advanced GC.AIM To investigate biomarkers that predict prognosis in GC patients treated with ICIs and develop accurate predictive models.METHODS Data from 273 patients diagnosed with GC and distant metastasis,who un-derwent≥1 cycle(s)of ICIs therapy were included in this study.Patients were randomly divided into training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3.Training set data were used to develop the machine learning models,and the test set was used to validate their predictive ability.Shapley additive explanations were used to provide insights into the best model.RESULTS Among the 273 patients with GC treated with ICIs in this study,112 died within 1 year,and 129 progressed within the same timeframe.Five features related to overall survival and 4 related to progression-free survival were identified and used to construct eXtreme Gradient Boosting(XGBoost),logistic regression,and decision tree.After comprehensive evaluation,XGBoost demonstrated good accuracy in predicting overall survival and progression-free survival.CONCLUSION The XGBoost model aided in identifying patients with GC who were more likely to benefit from ICIs therapy.Patient nutritional status may,to some extent,reflect prognosis.

Evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy in gastric cancer:Insights from immune checkpoint inhibitors

The emergence of immunotherapy,particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs),represents a groundbreaking approach to treating gastric cancer(GC).However,the prognosis of GC patients receiving ICI treatment is influenced by various factors.This manuscript identified sarcopenia and myosteatosis as independent prognostic factors impacting the outcomes of GC patients treated with ICIs.Additionally,this study introduced a visual predictive model to estimate the prognosis of GC patients.If confirmed by further studies,this observation could provide valuable insights to propel the advancement of personalized clinical medicine and the integration of precision medicine practices.

Application of immune checkpoint inhibitors and microsatellite instability in gastric cancer

In this editorial we comment on the article by Li published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology.We focus specifically on the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)and microsatellite instability(MSI)in gastric cancer(GC).The four pillars of GC management have long been considered,including surgery,chemotherapy,radiotherapy and targeted therapy.However,immunotherapy has recently emerged as a“fifth pillar”,and its use is rapidly expanding.There are four principal strategies for tumor immunotherapy:ICIs,tumor vaccines,adoptive immunotherapy and nonspecific immunomodulators.Of them,ICIs are the most advanced and widespread type of cancer immunotherapy for GC.Recent breakthrough results for ICIs have paved the way to a new era of cancer immunotherapy.In particular,inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis with ICIs,including nivolumab and pembrolizumab,has emerged as a novel treatment strategy for advanced GC.Unfortunately,these therapies are sometimes associated with often subtle,potentially fatal immune-related adverse events(irAEs),including dermatitis,diarrhea,colitis,endocrinopathy,hepatotoxicity,neuropathy and pneumonitis.We must be aware of these irAEs and improve the detection of these processes to prevent inappropriate discharges,emergency department revisits,and downstream complications.Recent studies have revealed that MSI-high or mismatch-repair-deficient tumors,regardless of their primary site,have a promising response to ICIs.So,it is important to detect MSI before applying ICIs for treatment of GC.

Efficacy evaluation and survival analysis of the combination of oxaliplatin plus Teysuno (SOX) with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the conversion therapy of locally advanced gastric cancer

Background:The efficacy of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer has been explored.However,limited research exists on its effectiveness in conversion therapy,and its superiority over standalone chemotherapy remains to be elucidated.This study aims to investigate the efficacy and survival outcomes of patients treated with ICIs in combination with conversion therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.Methods:Retrospective data from patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with either oxaliplatin+S-1(SOX)alone or in combination with ICIs in conversion therapywere collected.Clinical andpathological characteristics,disease-free survival,andefficacy assessments in nonoperable patients were compared between the 2 treatment groups.Efficacy was further evaluated through dynamic changes in serum markers,and patients’quality of life was assessed using the QLQ-STO22(Gastric Cancer–Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)quality-of-life measurement scale.Results:A total of 140 patients underwent conversion therapy:80 in the SOX alone group and 60 in the SOX combined with the ICIs group.There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups.Compared with the SOX alone group,the SOX combined with ICIs group exhibited a higher conversion rate(83.3%vs 75%,P=0.23),R0 resection rate(90.0%vs 83.3%,P=0.31),pathological complete response(pCR)rate(18%vs 5%,P=0.02),median disease-free survival(21.4 vs 16.9 months,P=0.007),the objective response rate in nonoperable patients(60%vs 40%,P=0.301),and median progression-free survival time(7.9 vs 5.7 months,P=0.009).The QLQ-STO22 quality-of-life assessment revealed statistically significant improvements in pain,swallowing difficulties,and dietary restrictions in the combination therapy group compared with those in the monotherapy group.The enhanced efficacy of immune combination with SOX is evident,as demonstrated by the significantly prolonged surgical duration in operated patients(206.6±26.6 min vs 197.8±19.8 min,P=0.35)and intraoperative blood loss(158.9±21.2 mL vs 148.9±25.1 mL,P=0.59).No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications.Conclusions:Compared with the SOX conversion therapy regimen,SOX combined with ICIs demonstrated higher conversion rates,R0 resection rates,pathological response rates,and disease-free survival without increasing surgical difficulty or complications.Nonoperable patients also experienced longer progression-free survival and objective response rates.

Biomarkers associated with immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)constitute a pivotal class of immunotherapeutic drugs in cancer treatment.However,their widespread clinical application has led to a notable surge in immune-related adverse events(irAEs),significantly affecting the efficacy and survival rates of patients undergoing ICI therapy.While conventional hematological and imaging tests are adept at detecting organ-specific toxicities,distinguishing adverse reactions from those induced by viruses,bacteria,or immune diseases remains a formidable challenge.Consequently,there exists an urgent imperative for reliable biomarkers capable of accurately predicting or diagnosing irAEs.Thus,a thorough review of existing studies on irAEs biomarkers is indispensable.Our review commences by providing a succinct over-view of major irAEs,followed by a comprehensive summary of irAEs biomarkers across various dimensions.Furthermore,we delve into innovative methodologies such as machine learning,single-cell RNA sequencing,multiomics analysis,and gut microbiota profiling to identify novel,robust biomarkers that can facilitate precise irAEs diagnosis or prediction.Lastly,this review furnishes a concise exposition of irAEs mechanisms to augment understanding of irAEs prediction,diagnosis,and treatment strategies.

Downstaging of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma followed by liver transplantation using immune checkpoint inhibitors:Where do we stand?

Liver transplantation(LT)in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)and chronic liver disease(CLD)is limited by factors such as tumor size,number,portal venous or hepatic venous invasion and extrahepatic disease.Although previously established criteria,such as Milan or UCSF,have been relaxed globally to accommodate more potential recipients with comparable 5-year outcomes,there is still a subset of the population that has advanced HCC with or without portal vein tumor thrombosis without detectable extrahepatic spread who do not qualify or are unable to be downstaged by conventional methods and do not qualify for liver transplantation.Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICI)such as atezolizumab,pembrolizumab,or nivolumab have given hope to this group of patients.We completed a comprehensive literature review using PubMed,Google Scholar,reference citation analysis,and CrossRef.The search utilized keywords such as'liver transplant','HCC','hepatocellular carcinoma','immune checkpoint inhibitors','ICI','atezolizumab',and'nivolumab'.Several case reports have documented successful downstaging of HCC using the atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination prior to LT,with acceptable early outcomes comparable to other criteria.Adverse effects of ICI have also been reported during the perioperative period.In such cases,a 1.5-month interval between ICI therapy and LT has been suggested.Overall,the results of downstaging using combination immunotherapy were encouraging and promising.Early reports suggested a potential ray of hope for patients with CLD and advanced HCC,especially those with multifocal HCC or branch portal venous tumor thrombosis.However,prospective studies and further experience will reveal the optimal dosage,duration,and timing prior to LT and evaluate both short-and long-term outcomes in terms of rejection,infection,recurrence rates,and survival.

Development and Application of Procedures for the Management of Skin Toxicity Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Lung Cancer

Objective: To establish the procedures for the management of skin toxicity related to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with lung cancer and explore the effect of application. Methods: A total of 24 evidence-based evidences were collected from 7 aspects, including risk factors, baseline screening, ICIs monitoring, daily skin care, multidisciplinary management, symptom management and health education. A total of 157 lung cancer patients and 94 nurses from 8 wards of the Oncology department of our hospital from November 2022 to May 2023 were selected by convenience sampling. A total of 77 patients and 46 nurses from ward 1 - 4 were divided into the baseline group. There were 80 patients and 48 nurses in Ward 5 - 8 as the evidence-based practice group. In the baseline group, patients were treated with routine methods such as assessing skin symptoms, taking medication according to symptoms, guiding to keep skin clean and moist, eating a light diet, and avoiding scratching. The evidence-based practice group adopts an evidence-based continuous improvement model for nursing. The differences in the severity of symptoms of skin toxicity in the second cycle of medication and the knowledge and practice of self-care of skin toxicity were compared between the two groups before and after the use of the syndrome, as well as the differences in the implementation rate of review indicators, evidence-based ability and knowledge and practice of skin toxicity care before and after the use of the syndrome. Results: The incidence and severity of cutaneous toxicity were significantly lower after treatment than before treatment (P P < 0.05). Conclusion: The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related skin toxicity management procedures can effectively reduce the incidence and severity of skin toxicity symptoms, optimize the clinical pathway, and improve the quality of care.

The role of radiotherapy in patients with refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma after treatment with brentuximab vedotin and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background:Approximately 10%–30%of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma(HL)experience relapse or refractory(R/R)disease after first-line standard therapy.Brentuximab vedotin(BV)and immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)have important roles in the salvage treatment of R/R HL.However,subsequent treatment for HL refractory to BV and/or ICI treatment is challenging.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed patients in two institutions who had R/R HL,experienced BV or ICI treatment failure,and received radiotherapy(RT)thereafter.The overall response rate(ORR),duration of response(DOR),progression-free survival(PFS),and overall survival(OS)were analyzed.Results:Overall,19 patients were enrolled.First-line systemic therapy comprised doxorubicin,bleomycin,vinblastine,and dacarbazine(ABVD,84.2%);AVD plus ICIs(10.5%);and bleomycin,etoposide,doxorubicin,cyclophosphamide,vincristine,procarbazine,and prednisone(BEACOPP,5.3%).After first-line therapy,15(78.9%)and four patients(21.1%)had refractory disease and relapsed,respectively.After R/R HL diagnosis,six(31.6%),two(10.5%),and 11(57.9%)patients received BV and ICIs concurrently,BV monotherapy,and ICI monotherapy,respectively.All patients received intensity-modulated RT(n=12,63.2%)or volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT;n=7,36.8%).The ORR as well as the complete response(CR)rate was 100%;the median DOR to RT was 17.2 months(range,7.9–46.7 months).Two patients showed progression outside the radiation field;one patient had extensive in-field,out-of-field,nodal,and extranodal relapse.With a median follow-up time of 16.2 months(range,9.2–23.2 months),the 1-year PFS and OS were 84.4%and 100%,respectively.PFS was associated with extranodal involvement(P=0.019)and gross tumor volume(P=0.044).All patients tolerated RT well without adverse events of grade≥3.Conclusion:RT is effective and safe for treating HL refractory to BV or ICIs and has the potential to be part of a comprehensive strategy for HL.

Cytokine release syndrome induced by anti-programmed death-1 treatment in a psoriasis patient:A dark side of immune checkpoint inhibitors

In recent years,cancer immunotherapy has introduced novel treatments,such as monoclonal antibodies,which have facilitated targeted therapies against tumor cells.Programmed death-1(PD-1)is an immune checkpoint expressed in T cells that regulates the immune system’s activity to prevent over-activation and tissue damage caused by inflammation.However,PD-1 is also expressed in tumor cells and functions as an immune evasion mechanism,making it a therapeutic target to enhance the immune response and eliminate tumor cells.Consequently,immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)have emerged as an option for certain tumor types.Nevertheless,blocking immune checkpoints can lead to immune-related adverse events(irAEs),such as psoriasis and cytokine release syndrome(CRS),as exemp-lified in the clinical case presented by Zhou et al involving a patient with adva-nced gastric cancer who received sintilimab,a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1.Subsequently,the patient experienced exacerbation of psoriasis and CRS.The objective of this editorial article is to elucidate potential immunologic mechanisms that may contribute to the development of CRS and psoriasis in patients receiving ICIs.It is crucial to acknowledge that while ICIs offer superior safety and efficacy compared to conventional therapies,they can also manifest irAEs affecting the skin,gastrointestinal tract,or respiratory system.In severe cases,these irAEs can lead to life-threatening complications such as circulatory shock or multiorgan failure.Consequently,it is recommended that patients receiving ICIs undergo regular monitoring to identify and manage these adverse events effectively.

Research Progress of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma cells are relatively prone to metastasis and have a high degree of heterogeneity, making a successful cure rather difficult. In recent years, an increasing number of immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for listing. Due to their strong targeting and relatively low toxic and side effects, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma has become more widespread. Currently, the research on immune checkpoint inhibitors mainly concentrates on PD-1/PDL1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, and TIGIT. Although they have certain advantages, the occurrence of drug resistance has also been frequently observed in clinical practice, presenting certain limitations. This study examined the structural features of key immune checkpoints, and explored the clinical implementation of their inhibitors and drug resistance mechanisms, aiming to offer insights for improved use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical settings.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer:Current evidence and future perspectives

Despite the application of conventional therapies,the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer(GC)or gastroesophageal junction cancer(GEJC)is still poor.In recent years,immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)have reshaped the paradigm of cancer therapy.Emerging evidence support the feasibility of programmed cell death-1(PD-1)and its ligand(PD-L1)inhibition in chemo-refractory GC/GEJC.Nivolumab and pembrolizumab have initially been approved in Japan and United States,respectively for the third-line treatment of progressive GC or GEJC.In March 2020,nivolumab has also been licensed in China for treating advanced GC/GEJC who received≥2 lines of systemic therapies.Current studies are moving forward to the first-line application or focusing on combination strategies,though data are insufficient and disputable.In this review,we summarize the recently reported and ongoing clinical trials in ICIs for advanced GC/GEJC.Molecular characteristics and clinical implications of different tumor subtypes are also reviewed.We further discuss the safety profile and biomarkers for predicting the response of ICIs,which has guiding values in clinical practice.

Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer:A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)have shown promising efficacy in treatment and clinical management of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.However,the inhibitors also cause immune-related adverse events(irAEs).The current systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to investigate the incidence and nature of irAEs caused by ICIs.AIM To investigate the incidence and nature of irAEs in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.METHODS This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO(Reg.number:CRD42020152291).Data included in this study were collected from patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer and treated with ICIs.A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed,EMBASE,and Cochrane Library databases.Meta-analysis was carried out using the single sample rate method.Synthesis and analysis of the data was conducted using Stata/SE and Review Manager Software.RESULTS The patients enrolled in the present study included 14 patients from 14 case reports,326 patients from 6 case series,and 1249 patients from 8 clinical trials.It was found that the overall incidence of irAEs was 16%[95%confidence interval(CI):11-20]for all grades and 3%(95%CI:2-4)for the severe grade.It was evident that the incidence of irAEs varied with the type of inhibitor and organs.A comparative study of the anti-programmed cell death receptor-1(PD-1)and antiprogrammed death receptor-ligand 1(PD-L1)treatments showed that the antiPD-1 group had a higher overall incidence of irAEs(20%)as compared with that of the anti-PD-L1 group(13%).Results of this study showed that the endocrine system experienced the highest incidence of organ-specific irAEs(7.4%),including hypothyroidism,hyperthyroidism,thyroiditis,diabetes,and adrenal insufficiency,followed by gastroenterology(2.2%),pulmonology(1.8%),neurology(1.4%),dermatology(1.4%),hematology(0.8%),and hepatology(0.7%).In clinical trials,it was found that the incidence of death related to irAEs was 1%(95%CI:0-2.0),whereby colitis and interstitial lung diseases were the leading causes of death.CONCLUSION It was evident that the incidence and nature of irAEs are both organ-and inhibitor-specific.The anti-PD-1 group had the highest incidence of all irAEs grades including the severe grades of irAEs.Early identification and management of irAEs allows clinical oncologists to effectively consider the pros and cons and hence enables them to strike a balance.

Effect of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Diverse Organ Lesions in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Objective The combination of stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)and immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)is actively being explored in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC)patients.However,little is known about the optimal fractionation and radiotherapy target lesions in this scenario.This study investigated the effect of SBRT on diverse organ lesions and radiotherapy dose fractionation regimens on the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs.Methods The medical records of advanced NSCLC patients consecutively treated with ICIs and SBRT were retrospectively reviewed at our institution from Dec.2015 to Sep.2021.Patients were grouped according to radiation sites.Progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)were recorded using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between different treatment groups using the log-rank(Mantel-Cox)test.Results A total of 124 advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs combined with SBRT were identified in this study.Radiation sites included lung lesions(lung group,n=43),bone metastases(bone group,n=24),and brain metastases(brain group,n=57).Compared with the brain group,the mean PFS(mPFS)in the lung group was significantly prolonged by 13.3 months(8.5 months vs.21.8 months,HR=0.51,95%CI:0.28–0.92,P=0.0195),and that in the bone group prolonged by 9.5 months with a 43%reduction in the risk of disease progression(8.5 months vs.18.0 months,HR=0.57,95%CI:0.29–1.13,P=0.1095).The mPFS in the lung group was prolonged by 3.8 months as compared with that in the bone group.The mean OS(mOS)in the lung and bone groups was longer than that of the brain group,and the risk of death decreased by up to 60%in the lung and bone groups as compared with that of the brain group.When SBRT was concurrently given with ICIs,the mPFS in the lung and brain groups were significantly longer than that of the bone group(29.6 months vs.16.5 months vs.12.1 months).When SBRT with 8–12 Gy per fraction was combined with ICIs,the mPFS in the lung group was significantly prolonged as compared with that of the bone and brain groups(25.4 months vs.15.2 months vs.12.0 months).Among patients receiving SBRT on lung lesions and brain metastases,the mPFS in the concurrent group was longer than that of the SBRT→ICIs group(29.6 months vs.11.4 months,P=0.0003 and 12.1 months vs.8.9 months,P=0.2559).Among patients receiving SBRT with<8 Gy and 8–12 Gy per fraction,the mPFS in the concurrent group was also longer than that of the SBRT→ICIs group(20.1 months vs.5.3 months,P=0.0033 and 24.0 months vs.13.4 months,P=0.1311).The disease control rates of the lung,bone,and brain groups were 90.7%,83.3%,and 70.1%,respectively.Conclusion The study demonstrated that the addition of SBRT on lung lesions versus bone and brain metastases to ICIs improved the prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients.This improvement was related to the sequence of radiotherapy combined with ICIs and the radiotherapy fractionation regimens.Dose fractionation regimens of 8–12 Gy per fraction and lung lesions as radiotherapy targets might be the appropriate choice for advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs combined with SBRT.

Faecal microbiota transplantation enhances efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy against cancer

Even though immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)are effective on multiple cancer types,there are still many non-responding patients.A possible factor put forward that may influence the efficacy of ICIs is the gut microbiota.Additionally,faecal microbiota transplantation may enhance efficacy of ICIs.Nevertheless,the data available in this field are insufficient,and relevant scientific work has just commenced.As a result,the current work reviewed the latest research on the association of gut microbiota with ICI treatments based on anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody and explored the therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation in combination with ICI therapy in the future.

Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their association with survival

BACKGROUND Despite the popularity of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)in the treatment of advanced cancer,patients often develop gastrointestinal(GI)and non-GI immune-related adverse events(irAEs).The clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of GI-irAEs have not been fully elucidated in previous reports.This necessitates the evaluation of the impact of GI-irAEs on patients receiving ICI treatment.AIM To evaluate the clinical characteristics of GI-irAEs and their impact on survival in patients treated with ICIs.METHODS In this single-center,retrospective,observational study,we reviewed the records of 661 patients who received ICIs for various cancers at Nagoya University Hospital from September 2014 to August 2020.We analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients who received ICI treatment.We also evaluated the correlation between GI-irAE development and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer(LC)and malignant melanoma(MM).Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the median overall survival(OS).Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors.A P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTS GI-irAEs occurred in 34 of 605 patients(5.6%)treated with an anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1(anti-PD-1/PD-L1)antibody alone and in nine of 56 patients(16.1%)treated with an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4(CTLA-4)antibody alone or a combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.The cumulative incidence and median daily diarrhea frequency were significantly higher in patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies(P<0.05).In 130 patients with MM,OS was significantly prolonged in the group that continued ICI treatment despite the development of GI-irAEs compared to the group that did not experience GI-irAEs(P=0.035).In contrast,in 209 patients with non-small cell LC,there was no significant difference in OS between the groups.The multivariate analyses showed that a performance status of 2-3(hazard ratio:2.406;95%confidence interval:1.125–5.147;P=0.024)was an independent predictive factor for OS in patients with MM.CONCLUSION Patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies develop GI-irAEs more frequently and with higher severity than those receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.Continuing ICI treatment in patients with MM with GI-irAEs have better OS.

Evaluation of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: Is there a role for positron emission tomography?

Strategies targeting intracellular negative regulators such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have demonstrated significant antitumor activity across a wide range of solid tumors. In the clinical practice, the radiological effect of immunotherapeutic agents has raised several more relevant and complex challenges for the determination of their imaging-based response at single patient level. Accordingly, it has been suggested that the conventional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors assessment alone, based on dimensional evaluation provided by computed tomography (CT), tends to underestimate the benefit of ICPIs at least in a subset of patients, supporting the need of immune-related response criteria. Different from CT, very few data are available for the evaluation of immunotherapy by means of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Moreover, since the antineoplastic activity of ICPIs is highly related to the activation of T cells against cancer cells, FDG accumulation might cause false-positive findings. Yet, discrimination between benign and malignant processes represents a huge challenge for FDG-PET in this clinical setting. Consequently, it might be of high interest to test the complex and variegated response to ICPIs by means of PET and thus it is worthwhile to ask if a similar introduction of immune-related PET-based criteria could be proposed in the future. Finally, PET might offer a new insight into the biology and pathophysiology of ICPIs thanks to a growing number of non-invasive immune-diagnostic approaches based on non-FDG tracers.

Disease exacerbation is common in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for malignancy

BACKGROUND Colitis is a known potential toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs).Studies evaluating the risk of disease exacerbation following ICI treatment in patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)are limited.AIM To assess the clinical characteristics of IBD patients treated with ICIs and determine prevalence of subsequent IBD exacerbations.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients in the Stanford Research Repository database with pre-existing IBD who were exposed to ICIs.RESULTS The prevalence of IBD exacerbation following ICI was 36.8% amongst 19 patients meeting inclusion criteria.Patients with exacerbations had more gastrointestinalrelated hospitalizations(4 of 7)than patients without exacerbations(0 of 12;P=0.0090).CONCLUSION The prevalence of IBD exacerbations following ICI was higher than reported rates of ICI-induced colitis and diarrhea in the general population and was associated with hospitalization.

The progress of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in breast cancer

Immunotherapy targets the dysfunctional immune system to induce cancer cell killing by CD8-positive T cells.Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs),specifically anti-PD-1 antibodies,anti-PD-L1 antibodies,and anti-CTLA4 antibodies,have revolutionized the management of many malignancies due to their significant role in generating a durable clinical response.However,clinical data suggest that response rates to ICI monotherapy are low due to the immunologically silent characteristics of breast cancer(BC).Chemotherapy,surgery,radiotherapy,and targeted therapy were recently reported to alter the tumor microenvironment and enhance the ICI response.Some clinical studies supported that ICIs,in combination with other treatment strategies,show superior efficacy in BC control,especially triple-negative breast cancer.Therefore,seeking a reasonable combination therapy is a promising way to improve ICI response.The present review highlights the clinical efficacy of ICIs treatment options in combination with standard-of-care therapies,such as chemotherapy and targeted therapy。