Objective:To validate a better scoring system between CURB-65 and the pneumonia severity index(PSI)to predict the need for intensive care unit admission and 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Methods...Objective:To validate a better scoring system between CURB-65 and the pneumonia severity index(PSI)to predict the need for intensive care unit admission and 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients in a tertiary care hospital in Kota,Rajasthan.Relevant data about history,and general and systemic examination with laboratory investigations was collected.Patients were categorized into different risk groups for ICU admission and 30-day mortality according to CURB-65 and PSI.Sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,and area under the curve were calculated.Continuous variables,means and percentages were compared using the t-test for numerical data and the Chi-square test for nominal data.Results:100 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR were included;67 were male and 33 were female.58 patients had severe disease(SpO2≤90%)and 30 patients died.CURB-65 had an area under the curve(AUC)of 0.81 for predicting ICU admission,with a sensitivity of 92%and a specificity of 54%for high risk patients.Meanwhile,PSI had an AUC of 0.88,with a sensitivity of 83%and a specificity of 73%in high risk patients.In addition,CURB-65 had an AUC of 0.79 for predicting 30-day mortality,with a sensitivity of 60%and a specificity of 89%in high risk patients.PSI had an AUC of 0.71 for predicting 30-day mortality,with a sensitivity of 90%and a specificity of 46%in high risk patients.Conclusions:This single-centre retrospective study involving a cohort of COVID-19 patients demonstrates that CURB-65 and PSI are powerful tools for predicting mortality.However,PSI appears to be slightly better at predicting the need for intensive care unit admission in high-risk patients.展开更多
Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains one of the leading causes ot death from infectious diseases around the world.Most severe CAP patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU),and receive...Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains one of the leading causes ot death from infectious diseases around the world.Most severe CAP patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU),and receive intense treatment.The present study aimed to evaluate the role of the pneumonia severity index (PSI),CURB-65,and sepsis score in the management of hospitalized CAP patients and explore the effect of ICU treatment on prognosis of severe cases.Methods A total of 675 CAP patients hospitalized in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were retrospectively investigated.The ability of different pneumonia severity scores to predict mortality was compared for effectiveness,while the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality rates and hospital length of stay (LOS) were evaluated.The effect of ICU treatment on the outcomes of severe CAP patients was also investigated.Results All three scoring systems revealed that the mortality associated with the low-risk or intermediate-risk group was significantly lower than with the high-risk group.As the risk level increased,the frequency of ICU admission rose in tandem and LOS in the hospital was prolonged.The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the prediction of mortality were 0.94,0.91 and 0.89 for the PSI,CURB-65 and sepsis score,respectively.Compared with the corresponding control groups,the mortality was markedly increased in patients with a history of smoking,prior admission to ICU,respiratory failure,or co-morbidity of heart disease.The differences were also identified in LOS between control groups and patients with ICU treatment,heart,or cerebrovascular disease.Logistic regression analysis showed that age over 65 years,a history of smoking,and respiratory failure were closely related to mortality in the overall CAP cohort,whereas age,ICU admission,respiratory failure,and LOS at home between disease attack and hospital admission were identified as independent risk factors for mortality in the high-risk CAP sub-group.The 30-day mortality of patients who underwent ICU treatment on admission was also higher than for non-ICU treatment,but much lower than for those patients who took ICU treatment subsequent to the failure of non-ICU treatment.Conclusions Each severity score system,CURB-65,sepsis severity score and especially PSI,was capable of effectively predicting CAP mortality.Delayed ICU admission was related to higher mortality rates in severe CAP patients.展开更多
文摘Objective:To validate a better scoring system between CURB-65 and the pneumonia severity index(PSI)to predict the need for intensive care unit admission and 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients in a tertiary care hospital in Kota,Rajasthan.Relevant data about history,and general and systemic examination with laboratory investigations was collected.Patients were categorized into different risk groups for ICU admission and 30-day mortality according to CURB-65 and PSI.Sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,and area under the curve were calculated.Continuous variables,means and percentages were compared using the t-test for numerical data and the Chi-square test for nominal data.Results:100 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR were included;67 were male and 33 were female.58 patients had severe disease(SpO2≤90%)and 30 patients died.CURB-65 had an area under the curve(AUC)of 0.81 for predicting ICU admission,with a sensitivity of 92%and a specificity of 54%for high risk patients.Meanwhile,PSI had an AUC of 0.88,with a sensitivity of 83%and a specificity of 73%in high risk patients.In addition,CURB-65 had an AUC of 0.79 for predicting 30-day mortality,with a sensitivity of 60%and a specificity of 89%in high risk patients.PSI had an AUC of 0.71 for predicting 30-day mortality,with a sensitivity of 90%and a specificity of 46%in high risk patients.Conclusions:This single-centre retrospective study involving a cohort of COVID-19 patients demonstrates that CURB-65 and PSI are powerful tools for predicting mortality.However,PSI appears to be slightly better at predicting the need for intensive care unit admission in high-risk patients.
基金This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30871130 and 30500229),the Qianjiang Talent Project of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (No.2010R10080),and the Youth Talent Fund of Health Bureau of Zhejiang Province,China (No.2008QN016).
文摘Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains one of the leading causes ot death from infectious diseases around the world.Most severe CAP patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU),and receive intense treatment.The present study aimed to evaluate the role of the pneumonia severity index (PSI),CURB-65,and sepsis score in the management of hospitalized CAP patients and explore the effect of ICU treatment on prognosis of severe cases.Methods A total of 675 CAP patients hospitalized in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were retrospectively investigated.The ability of different pneumonia severity scores to predict mortality was compared for effectiveness,while the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality rates and hospital length of stay (LOS) were evaluated.The effect of ICU treatment on the outcomes of severe CAP patients was also investigated.Results All three scoring systems revealed that the mortality associated with the low-risk or intermediate-risk group was significantly lower than with the high-risk group.As the risk level increased,the frequency of ICU admission rose in tandem and LOS in the hospital was prolonged.The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the prediction of mortality were 0.94,0.91 and 0.89 for the PSI,CURB-65 and sepsis score,respectively.Compared with the corresponding control groups,the mortality was markedly increased in patients with a history of smoking,prior admission to ICU,respiratory failure,or co-morbidity of heart disease.The differences were also identified in LOS between control groups and patients with ICU treatment,heart,or cerebrovascular disease.Logistic regression analysis showed that age over 65 years,a history of smoking,and respiratory failure were closely related to mortality in the overall CAP cohort,whereas age,ICU admission,respiratory failure,and LOS at home between disease attack and hospital admission were identified as independent risk factors for mortality in the high-risk CAP sub-group.The 30-day mortality of patients who underwent ICU treatment on admission was also higher than for non-ICU treatment,but much lower than for those patients who took ICU treatment subsequent to the failure of non-ICU treatment.Conclusions Each severity score system,CURB-65,sepsis severity score and especially PSI,was capable of effectively predicting CAP mortality.Delayed ICU admission was related to higher mortality rates in severe CAP patients.