BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic impacted in a still undefined way pregnant women’s mental health.There are reports of mood and affect changes in the general population and the suggestion tha...BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic impacted in a still undefined way pregnant women’s mental health.There are reports of mood and affect changes in the general population and the suggestion that similar changes occur also in the pregnant population.The greater vulnerability of women during the COVID-19 restriction period may translate into a greater risk for mental disorders in the gestational period.We hypothesised that pregnant women in the prepandemic period would have less psychopathology and more psychological support than pregnant women during the pandemic restriction period.AIM To compare pregnant women for anxiety,prenatal depression,psychopathology,and social support before and after the awareness of the pandemic.METHODSWe administered to women willing to participate in their 2nd-3rd trimesters of pregnancy theEdinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS),the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y(STAI-Y),and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised(SCL-90R);we further collected sociodemographicvariables and explored women’s social support.The comparison was cross-sectional.The firstsample was termed nonCOVID-19 because data were gathered before the COVID-19 outbreak(January 2020-February 2020)was declared,and the second sample termed COVID-19 becauseparticipants were already subjected to the COVID-19-related restrictive measures(January 2021-February 2021).Since normal distribution was not met(Shapiro-Wilk test applied),we appliednonparametric Mann-Whitney’s U-test to compare psychometric tests.Ethical standards were met.RESULTSThe nonCOVID-19 group reported higher support from partners only,while the COVID-19 groupreported multiple support(χ^(2)=9.7181;P=0.021);the nonCOVID-19 group scored higher than theCOVID-19 group only on state anxiety among psychometric scales[STAI-Y1,nonCOVID-19median=39(95%CI:39.19-51.10)vs COVID-19 median=32(95%CI:30.83-38.90);Mann-Whitney’sU=117.5,P=0.00596].Other measures did not differ meaningfully between the two groups.Scoreson the EPDS,the state and trait subscales of the STAI-Y,and most SCL-90R subscales intercorrelatedwith one another.The anxiety component of the EPDS,EPDS-3A,correlated poorlywith other measures,while it was the Global Symptom Index of the SCL-90-R that correlated moststrongly with most measures.Our results are at odds with most literature and do not confirmincreased depression and anxiety rates in pregnant women during the pandemic.CONCLUSIONThe ability of pregnant women to deal with novel generalised threats involves mobilization ofinner resources.Increasing sources of social support may have produced anxiolysis in the COVID-19 sample.展开更多
BACKGROUND The advent of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)unveiled the worst national blood crisis that the United States had witnessed in over a decade.With the pandemic influencing the different stages of the acqui...BACKGROUND The advent of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)unveiled the worst national blood crisis that the United States had witnessed in over a decade.With the pandemic influencing the different stages of the acquisition of blood products outside the hospital setting,we aimed to explore the possible barriers contributing to the shortage of blood products within the medical community.the COVID era and pre-COVID era.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on hospitalized patients distinguishing the pattern of blood transfusion during the COVID and pre-COVID era in a community hospital.Data was tabulated to include the number of red blood cell(RBC)transfusions and if transfusions met restrictive blood transfusion criteria as per institutional guidelines.Chi-square was applied to test the statistical association between qualitative variables.Unpaired t test and Mann Whitney U test were applied respectively to test the mean difference of quantitative variables.RESULTS A total of 208 patients were included in the study,of which 108 were during COVID era and 100 were during pre-COVID era.The leading reason for admission in both the COVID era and pre-COVID era transfused patients was shortness of breath(53.7%and 36%P=0.001),followed by gastrointestinal bleeding(25.9%and 21%P=0.001).There was a higher percentage of RBC transfusions in the intensive care unit in the COVID-era group than in the pre-COVID era group(38.9%vs 22%,P=0.008).The restrictive transfusion criteria were met in 62%vs 79%in the COVID and pre-COVID eras,respectively(P=0.008).CONCLUSION The COVID-era group received RBC transfusions with less stringent adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices in comparison to pre-COVID era group.展开更多
目的:分析新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)相关心律失常的文献,探索该领域的研究现状、热点并预测未来的趋势,为后来的研究者提供借鉴。方法:选择Web of Science的核心合集数据库,每项研究都进行了文献计量和视觉分析,使用CiteSpace和VOSvie...目的:分析新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)相关心律失常的文献,探索该领域的研究现状、热点并预测未来的趋势,为后来的研究者提供借鉴。方法:选择Web of Science的核心合集数据库,每项研究都进行了文献计量和视觉分析,使用CiteSpace和VOSviewer软件生成知识图谱。结果:共鉴定出768篇文章,发文涉及美国、意大利和中国为首的319个国家/地区和4 366个机构,领先的研究机构是梅奥诊所和哈佛医学院。New England Journal of Medicine是该领域最常被引用的期刊。在6 687位作者中,Arbelo Elena撰写的研究最多,Guo T被共同引用的次数最多,心房纤颤是最常见的关键词。结论:随着COVID-19的暴发,对COVID-19所致新发/进行性心律失常事件的研究蓬勃发展,未来的研究者可能会对COVID-19感染后新发或遗留的快速性心律失常/缓慢性心律失常的发生机制进行进一步的探索。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic impacted in a still undefined way pregnant women’s mental health.There are reports of mood and affect changes in the general population and the suggestion that similar changes occur also in the pregnant population.The greater vulnerability of women during the COVID-19 restriction period may translate into a greater risk for mental disorders in the gestational period.We hypothesised that pregnant women in the prepandemic period would have less psychopathology and more psychological support than pregnant women during the pandemic restriction period.AIM To compare pregnant women for anxiety,prenatal depression,psychopathology,and social support before and after the awareness of the pandemic.METHODSWe administered to women willing to participate in their 2nd-3rd trimesters of pregnancy theEdinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS),the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y(STAI-Y),and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised(SCL-90R);we further collected sociodemographicvariables and explored women’s social support.The comparison was cross-sectional.The firstsample was termed nonCOVID-19 because data were gathered before the COVID-19 outbreak(January 2020-February 2020)was declared,and the second sample termed COVID-19 becauseparticipants were already subjected to the COVID-19-related restrictive measures(January 2021-February 2021).Since normal distribution was not met(Shapiro-Wilk test applied),we appliednonparametric Mann-Whitney’s U-test to compare psychometric tests.Ethical standards were met.RESULTSThe nonCOVID-19 group reported higher support from partners only,while the COVID-19 groupreported multiple support(χ^(2)=9.7181;P=0.021);the nonCOVID-19 group scored higher than theCOVID-19 group only on state anxiety among psychometric scales[STAI-Y1,nonCOVID-19median=39(95%CI:39.19-51.10)vs COVID-19 median=32(95%CI:30.83-38.90);Mann-Whitney’sU=117.5,P=0.00596].Other measures did not differ meaningfully between the two groups.Scoreson the EPDS,the state and trait subscales of the STAI-Y,and most SCL-90R subscales intercorrelatedwith one another.The anxiety component of the EPDS,EPDS-3A,correlated poorlywith other measures,while it was the Global Symptom Index of the SCL-90-R that correlated moststrongly with most measures.Our results are at odds with most literature and do not confirmincreased depression and anxiety rates in pregnant women during the pandemic.CONCLUSIONThe ability of pregnant women to deal with novel generalised threats involves mobilization ofinner resources.Increasing sources of social support may have produced anxiolysis in the COVID-19 sample.
文摘BACKGROUND The advent of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)unveiled the worst national blood crisis that the United States had witnessed in over a decade.With the pandemic influencing the different stages of the acquisition of blood products outside the hospital setting,we aimed to explore the possible barriers contributing to the shortage of blood products within the medical community.the COVID era and pre-COVID era.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on hospitalized patients distinguishing the pattern of blood transfusion during the COVID and pre-COVID era in a community hospital.Data was tabulated to include the number of red blood cell(RBC)transfusions and if transfusions met restrictive blood transfusion criteria as per institutional guidelines.Chi-square was applied to test the statistical association between qualitative variables.Unpaired t test and Mann Whitney U test were applied respectively to test the mean difference of quantitative variables.RESULTS A total of 208 patients were included in the study,of which 108 were during COVID era and 100 were during pre-COVID era.The leading reason for admission in both the COVID era and pre-COVID era transfused patients was shortness of breath(53.7%and 36%P=0.001),followed by gastrointestinal bleeding(25.9%and 21%P=0.001).There was a higher percentage of RBC transfusions in the intensive care unit in the COVID-era group than in the pre-COVID era group(38.9%vs 22%,P=0.008).The restrictive transfusion criteria were met in 62%vs 79%in the COVID and pre-COVID eras,respectively(P=0.008).CONCLUSION The COVID-era group received RBC transfusions with less stringent adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices in comparison to pre-COVID era group.
文摘目的:分析新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)相关心律失常的文献,探索该领域的研究现状、热点并预测未来的趋势,为后来的研究者提供借鉴。方法:选择Web of Science的核心合集数据库,每项研究都进行了文献计量和视觉分析,使用CiteSpace和VOSviewer软件生成知识图谱。结果:共鉴定出768篇文章,发文涉及美国、意大利和中国为首的319个国家/地区和4 366个机构,领先的研究机构是梅奥诊所和哈佛医学院。New England Journal of Medicine是该领域最常被引用的期刊。在6 687位作者中,Arbelo Elena撰写的研究最多,Guo T被共同引用的次数最多,心房纤颤是最常见的关键词。结论:随着COVID-19的暴发,对COVID-19所致新发/进行性心律失常事件的研究蓬勃发展,未来的研究者可能会对COVID-19感染后新发或遗留的快速性心律失常/缓慢性心律失常的发生机制进行进一步的探索。
