This systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of the disposable circumcision suture device （DCSD） and conventional circumcision （CC） in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis. Two independent re...This systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of the disposable circumcision suture device （DCSD） and conventional circumcision （CC） in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis. Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search for randomized controlled trials （RCTs） using the DCSD and CC for the treatment of redundant prepuce or phimosis in China and abroad. Nine RCTs （1898 cases） were included. Compared with the CC group, the DCSD group had a shorter operative time （standardized mean difference [SMD] = -21.44; 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs] [-25.08, -17.79]; P 〈 0.00001）, shorter wound healing time （SMD = -3.66; 95% CI [-5.46, -1.85]; P 〈 0.0001）, less intraoperative blood loss （SMD = -9.64; 95% CI [-11.37, -7.90]; P 〈 0.00001）, better cosmetic penile appearance （odds ratio [OR] =8.77; 95% CI [5.90, 13.02]; P 〈 0.00001）, lower intraoperative pain score, lower 24-h postoperative pain score, lower incidence of infection, less incision edema, and fewer adverse events. There were no differences between the CC and DCSD groups in the incidences of dehiscence, or hematoma. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that the DCSD appears to be safer and more effective than CC. However, additional high-quality RCTs with larger study populations are needed.展开更多
This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-cent...This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-centered, prospective study was conducted at the West China Hospital, where patients were circumcised using the no-flip SR （n = 408） or the DS （n = 94） procedure. The adverse events （AEs） and satisfaction were recorded for both groups, and ring-removal time and percentage of delayed removals were recorded for the SR group. Finally, complete follow-up data were collected for 76.1% of patients （SR： n = 306; DS： n = 76）. The average ring-removal time for the SR group was 17.62 ± 6.30 days. The operation time （P 〈 0.001）, pain scores during the procedure （P 〈 0.001） and at 24 h postoperatively （P 〈 0.001）, bleeding （P = 0.001）, infection （P = 0.034）, and satisfaction with penile appearance （P 〈 0.001） in the SR group were superior to those in the DS group. After two postoperative weeks, the percentage of patients with edema in the SR group （P = 0.029） was higher but no differences were found at 4 weeks （P = 0, 185） between the two groups. In conclusions, the no-flip SR method was found to be superior to the DS method for its short operation time （〈5 min）, involving less pain, bleeding, infection, and resulting in a satisfactory appearance. However, the time for recovery from edema took longer, and patients may wear device for 2-3 weeks after the procedure.展开更多
文摘This systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of the disposable circumcision suture device （DCSD） and conventional circumcision （CC） in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis. Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search for randomized controlled trials （RCTs） using the DCSD and CC for the treatment of redundant prepuce or phimosis in China and abroad. Nine RCTs （1898 cases） were included. Compared with the CC group, the DCSD group had a shorter operative time （standardized mean difference [SMD] = -21.44; 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs] [-25.08, -17.79]; P 〈 0.00001）, shorter wound healing time （SMD = -3.66; 95% CI [-5.46, -1.85]; P 〈 0.0001）, less intraoperative blood loss （SMD = -9.64; 95% CI [-11.37, -7.90]; P 〈 0.00001）, better cosmetic penile appearance （odds ratio [OR] =8.77; 95% CI [5.90, 13.02]; P 〈 0.00001）, lower intraoperative pain score, lower 24-h postoperative pain score, lower incidence of infection, less incision edema, and fewer adverse events. There were no differences between the CC and DCSD groups in the incidences of dehiscence, or hematoma. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that the DCSD appears to be safer and more effective than CC. However, additional high-quality RCTs with larger study populations are needed.
文摘This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-centered, prospective study was conducted at the West China Hospital, where patients were circumcised using the no-flip SR （n = 408） or the DS （n = 94） procedure. The adverse events （AEs） and satisfaction were recorded for both groups, and ring-removal time and percentage of delayed removals were recorded for the SR group. Finally, complete follow-up data were collected for 76.1% of patients （SR： n = 306; DS： n = 76）. The average ring-removal time for the SR group was 17.62 ± 6.30 days. The operation time （P 〈 0.001）, pain scores during the procedure （P 〈 0.001） and at 24 h postoperatively （P 〈 0.001）, bleeding （P = 0.001）, infection （P = 0.034）, and satisfaction with penile appearance （P 〈 0.001） in the SR group were superior to those in the DS group. After two postoperative weeks, the percentage of patients with edema in the SR group （P = 0.029） was higher but no differences were found at 4 weeks （P = 0, 185） between the two groups. In conclusions, the no-flip SR method was found to be superior to the DS method for its short operation time （〈5 min）, involving less pain, bleeding, infection, and resulting in a satisfactory appearance. However, the time for recovery from edema took longer, and patients may wear device for 2-3 weeks after the procedure.
