Second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma:Time for more individualized treatment options?

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is the most frequently diagnosed primary tumor of the liver and is usually detected as advanced disease.It is an aggressive disease that often progresses rapidly when it fails to respond to treatment.As such,patients have limited opportunities to try different subsequent-line treatment regimens.In the last 5 years,the number of agents and/or regimens available for the treatment of advanced HCC has significantly increased,which has made treatment choices for this patient population increasingly complex.In the secondline setting,several phase III trials of regorafenib(RESORCE),ramucirumab(REACH/REACH-2),and cabozantinib(CELESTIAL)have demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits in patients with the disease.However,the median overall survival of patients with advanced HCC remains unchanged at approximately 12 mo from the start of systemic second-line therapy,with a limited duration of response.Evidence from the REACH/REACH-2 trials demonstrated for the first time that baseline alpha-fetoprotein(AFP)levels can be used as an identification factor to select those who are likely to benefit the most from ramucirumab treatment.Ramucirumab is both well tolerated and efficacious and has a clinically acceptable safety profile.Therefore,it should be considered an option for patients with AFP levels≥400 ng/mL.

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer

Objective： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan （CPT-11） plus cisplatin （DDP） in patients with small cell lung cancer （SCLC） as second-line chemotherapy. Methods： Patients received irinotecan 60 mg/m^2 on days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 25 mg/m^2 on days 1-3, every 28 days one cycle. Response was evaluated every two cycles and patients were follow-up for two years or until death. Results： Among the 28 evaluable patients, there were 1 CR, 7 PR, 8 SD and 12 PD. The response rate was 28.6% （8/28）. Median time to progression （TTP） was 3.2 （0.8-5.6） months. Median survival after second-line treatment was 7.5 （1.5-31） months and overall survival was 15 （2.3-43.5） months. The most common adverse effect was hematological toxicity with 36.7% （11/30）, grades Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutroperia. Hepatic toxicity was another major side effect. Only one patient developed grade Ⅲ diarrhea. Conclusion： The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin is feasible, effective, and safe for SCLC as second-line treatment.

Oral chemotherapy for second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND There is no standard therapy for second-line treatment of gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer patients with poor performance status.A combination of chemotherapy drugs 5-fluorouracil(5-FU),leucovorin,irinotecan,and oxaliplatin(FOLFIRINOX)or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus nanoliposomal irinotecan can be considered as second-line treatment for such patients;however,due to toxicity,none of the regimens are recommended for patients with poor performance.Capecitabine or S-1 has relatively low toxicity and can be considered a treatment option for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.AIM To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of oral chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer.METHODS Patients who had progressive disease after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed between January 2011 and December 2018.They were treated with capecitabine or S-1 as the second-line treatment.Capecitabine was administered as a 2500 mg/m2 divided dose on days 1-14,followed by a 1-wk rest.S-1 was taken orally based on the patient’s body surface area for 28 d,followed by 2-wk of rest.Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to compare efficacy of capecitabine and S-1.RESULTS Of the 81 patients,41 were treated with capecitabine and 40 with S-1.The median time to treatment failure in both groups was 1.5 mo(P=0.425).The objective response rate was similar in the two groups:9.8%with capecitabine and 2.5%with S-1(P=0.359).Median progression-free survival was longer in the S-1 group than in the capecitabine group(S-12.7 mo,capecitabine 2.0 mo,P=0.003).There was no significant difference in the median overall survival between the capecitabine and S-1 groups(4.3 mo vs 5.0 mo,P=0.092).Grade 3 or 4 hand-foot syndrome was significantly more common in the capecitabine group than in the S-1 group(14.6%vs 0%,P=0.026).CONCLUSION Capecitabine or S-1 can be used as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with poor performance status after progression to a gemcitabine-based regimen.

Second-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer:Current options and future directions

Gastric cancer remains one among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths, regardless of its decreasing incidence and newly available treatment options. Most patients present at an advanced stage and are treated with upfront systemic chemotherapy. Those patients receiving first-line therapy may initially respond to treatment, but many of them relapse over time. In such condition, second-line treatment for disease progression remains the only available option. Although there exists no standard approach in the second-line setting, several phase Ⅲ trials have shown modest survival benefit in patients receiving irinotecan, taxane and ramucirumab over the best supportive care or active agents. This review analyzes the currently available treatment regimens and future directions of research in the second-line setting for metastatic gastric cancer with the best available evidence. Additionally, the prognostic factors that influence patient survival in those receiving second-line therapy are discussed.

Efficacy and Safety of Generic Dasatinib as a Second-line Treatment for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia:a Multicenter Retrospective Study in Hubei Province,China

Dasatinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)and it could be used as a second-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).Yinishu,a generic dasatinib made in China,was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration in 2013 and it costs much less than the patented dasatinib SPRYCEL.The present study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of Yinishu as a second-line treatment for CML by comparing the baseline clinical characteristics,rates of adverse events and efficacy between Yinishu and SPRYCEL groups. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the rates of optimal response between Yinishu and SPRYCEL for patients who started second-line treatment because of treatment failure.For patients who started second-line treatment because of intolerance of first-line treatment, their levels of BCR-ABL1/ABL1 on the international scale (BCR-ABL^IS)was maintained very low throughout the course of Yinishu treatment.Drug-related adverse events occurred with the same frequency in these two groups.It was confirmed that Yinishu was effective and safe as a second- line treatment for CML patients.Yinishu may be more suitable for patients who are economically unable to pay for the patented dasatinib SPRYCEL.

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as second-line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis:Is the evidence of sufficient quality to develop recommendations?

BACKGROUND The standard management of autoimmune hepatitis(AIH)is based on corticosteroids,alone or in combination with azathioprine.Second-line treatments are needed for patients who have refractory disease.However,high-quality data on the alternative management of AIH are scarce.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)and the quality of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation approach(GRADE).METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data were performed.We calculated pooled event rates for three outcome measures:Biochemical remission,adverse events,and mortality,with their corresponding 95%confidence intervals(CI).RESULTS The pooled biochemical remission rate was 68.9%(95%CI:60.4-76.2)for tacrolimus,and 59.6%(95%CI:54.8-64.2)for MMF,and rates of adverse events were 25.5%(95%CI:12.4-45.3)for tacrolimus and 24.1%(95%CI:15.4-35.7)for MMF.The pooled mortality rate was estimated at 11.5%(95%CI:7.1-18.1)for tacrolimus and 9.01%(95%CI:6.2-12.8)for MMF.Pooled biochemical remission rates for tacrolimus and MMF in patients with intolerance to standard therapy were 56.6%(CI:43.4-56.6)vs 73.5%(CI:58.1-84.7),and among non-responders were 59.1%(CI:48.7-68.8)vs 40.8%(CI:32.3-50.0),respectively.Moreover,the overall quality assessments using GRADE proved to be very low for all our outcomes in both treatment groups.CONCLUSION Tacrolimus and MMF are in practice considered effective for patients with AIH who are non-responders or intolerant to first-line treatment,but we found no high-quality evidence to support this statement.

Targeted agents for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Over the past ten years,sorafenib,a multikinase inhibitor,has been the standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)and wellpreserved liver function.Recently,lenvatinib,a different multikinase inhibitor,was shown to be non-inferior to sorafenib,in terms of survival,while all other agents previously tested failed to prove non-inferiority(or superiority)when compared to sorafenib.Similarly,in the second-line setting,most investigational drugs failed to provide better survival outcomes than placebo.However,in the last 2 years three positive phase III trials have been published in this setting.The RESORCE trial,a phase III study evaluating regorafenib in HCC patients who experienced disease progression after first-line treatment with sorafenib,showed better outcomes with regorafenib compared to placebo.More recently,the phase III CELESTIAL trial demonstrated the superiority of cabozantinib,a multikinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor,MET,and AXL,vs placebo in the second-and third-line setting in patients progressing on or intolerant to sorafenib.The survival benefits of a sustained anti-angiogenic inhibition were demonstrated also with ramucirumab in the phase III REACH-2 trial in patients previously treated with sorafenib and who had high baseline alpha-fetoprotein levels.Overall,the adverse events reported in these trials were in line with the known safety profiles of the tested agents.After nearly a decade of a certain degree of stagnation,we are now witnessing a period of novel therapeutic advances with multikinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies that will likely change the treatment scenario of HCC.

Topotecan Use for Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer at Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA)

Objective: Cervical cancer represents the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and is an important cause of death for women suffering with malignancies. Patients who are refractory or progressed after first-line palliative treatment have a dismal prognosis and no second-line chemotherapy is considered standard so far. Several agents have been investigated in this setting and topotecan is one of the most characterized. The objective of this study was to evaluate response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of topotecan in second palliative line for cervical cancer. Methods: An analysis was performed of all patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer treated with topotecan in second palliative line at Brazilian National Cancer Institute, between 2008 and 2010. Results: A total of 73 courses of topotecan were given in the current study (median: 3.5 cycles;range 1 - 6). Anemia was the most frequent adverse event (grade 2:35%;grade 3:30%). Of the 20 patients evaluable, there were 2 partial responders to the treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) was 10%;3 patients (15%) had stable disease as maximum response. The median PFS for the entire group was 2.93 months (95% CI 2.41 - 3.45) and OS was 4.66 months (95% CI 1.21 - 8.11). Conclusion: The limited activity of topotecan schemas in second-line treatment of cervical cancer and the associated overall toxicity may not justify their use in this setting. Patients who progress after first-line treatment may be offered participation in clinical trials, other second-line agents or best supportive care measures.

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy as second-line treatment in previously EGFR-TKI treated patients with EGFR-mutant-advanced NSCLC:a multicenter phase-II trial

This multicenter phase-II trial aimed to investigate the efficacy,safety,and predictive biomarkers of toripalimab plus chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant-advanced NSCLC.Patients who failed from first-line EGFR-TKIs and did not harbor T790M mutation were enrolled.Toripalimab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed were administrated every three weeks for up to six cycles,followed by the maintenance of toripalimab and pemetrexed.The primary endpoint was objective-response rate(ORR).Integrated biomarker analysis of PD-L1 expression,tumor mutational burden(TMB),CD8+tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte(TIL)density,whole-exome,and transcriptome sequencing on tumor biopsies were also conducted.Forty patients were enrolled with an overall ORR of 50.0%and disease-control rate(DCR)of 87.5%.The median progression free survival(PFS)and overall survival were 7.0 and 23.5 months,respectively.The most common treatment-related adverse effects were leukopenia,neutropenia,anemia,ALT/AST elevation,and nausea.Biomarker analysis showed that none of PD-L1 expression,TMB level,and CD8+TIL density could serve as a predictive biomarker.Integrated analysis of whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing data revealed that patients with DSPP mutation had a decreased M2 macrophage infiltration and associated with longer PFS than those of wild type.Toripalimab plus chemotherapy showed a promising anti-tumor activity with acceptable safety profiles as the second-line setting in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.DSPP mutation might serve as a potential biomarker for this combination.A phase-III trial to compare toripalimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy in this setting is ongoing(NCT03924050).

Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma:a real-world study

Objective:Little progress has been made in recent years using first-line chemotherapy,including gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel,FOLFIRINOX,and NALIRIFOX,for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma(APC).In addition,the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen has not been determined.This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of second-line chemotherapy for APC.Methods:Patients with APC who received first-line treatment from January 2008 to January 2021 were considered eligible for this retrospective analysis.The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS),respectively.Results:Four hundred and thirty-seven and 617 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil-and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment,respectively.Demographic and clinical features,except age and liver metastasis,were comparable between the two groups(P<0.05).The median OS was 8.8 and 7.8 months in patients who received a 5-fluorouracil-and gemcitabine-based combined regimen for first-line therapy,respectively(HR=1.244,95%CI=1.090–1.419;P<0.001).The median OS was 5.6 and 1.9 months in patients who received second-line chemotherapy and supportive care,respectively(HR=0.766,95%CI=0.677–0.867;P<0.001).The median PFS was not significantly differently between gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy and combination therapy.Conclusions:A 5-fluorouracil-or gemcitabine-based combined regimen was shown to be as effective as a single 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine regimen as second-line therapy for patients with APC.

Second-line rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Where are we now?

At present, the best rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection following failure of firstline eradication remains unclear. The Maastricht Ⅴ/Florence Consensus Report recommends bismuth quadruple therapy, or fluoroquinolone-amoxicillin triple/quadruple therapy as the second-line therapy for H. pylori infection. Meta-analyses have shown that bismuth quadruple therapy and levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy have comparable eradication rates, while the former has more adverse effects than the latter. There are no significant differences between the eradication rates of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple and quadruple therapies. However, the eradication rates of both levofloxacin-containing treatments are suboptimal. An important caveat of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple or quadruple therapy is poor eradication efficacy in the presence of fluoroquinolone resistance. High-dose dual therapy is an emerging second-line therapy and has an eradication efficacy comparable with levofloxacinamoxicillin triple therapy. Recently, a 10-d tetracyclinelevofloxacin(TL) quadruple therapy comprised of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline and levofloxacin has been developed, which achieves a markedly higher eradication rate compared with levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy(98% vs 69%) in patients with failure of standard triple, bismuth quadruple or non-bismuth quadruple therapy. The present article reviews current second-line anti-H. pylori regimens and treatment algorisms. In conclusion, bismuth quadruple therapy, levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple/quadruple therapy, high-dose dual therapy and TL quadruple therapy can be used as second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. Current evidence suggests that 10-d TL quadruple therapy is a simple and effective regimen, and has the potential to become a universal rescue treatment following eradication failure by all firstline eradication regimens for H. pylori infection.

Effectiveness of second-line anti-HER2 treatment in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with trastuzumab:A real-world study

Objective:Several studies have demonstrated different benefits for patients whose disease progressed despite previous trastuzumab treatment.Due to limited real-world data,we evaluate the effectiveness of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)therapy(lapatinib or trastuzumab)plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients who were previously treated with trastuzumab-containing regimens and investigate factors associated with effectiveness.And we further show the effectiveness of the two anti-HER2 therapy groups.Methods:A total of 342 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer(MBC)patients whose disease progressed during prior anti-HER2(trastuzumab)and standard chemotherapy therapy from Department of Breast Oncology,the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,from August 2010 to December 2016 were included.Seventy-eight patients received standard chemotherapy only,148 patients continued to receive trastuzumab and switched to other chemotherapy drugs,and 116 patients received tyrosine-kinase inhibitors(TKIs;lapatinib)and chemotherapy.The main outcome measures were progression-free survival(PFS),overall response rate(ORR),and clinical benefit rate(CBR).Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify patient characteristics associated with the greatest clinical benefit.Results:After a median follow-up of 26.2(range,2.0-56.0)months,PFS significantly improved with anti-HER2 therapy compared with chemotherapy alone:median 6.0 months with lapatinib[95%confidence interval(95%CI),4.53-7.47],4.5 months with trastuzumab(95%CI,3.99-5.01)vs.3.0 months with chemotherapy alone(95%CI,2.42-3.58);stratified hazard ratio(HR)=0.70,95%CI,0.60-0.81;P<0.0001.The ORR values were 33.6%,25.0%and 12.8%,respectively,the CBR values were 60.3%,48.6%and 26.9%,respectively.The effectiveness of lapatinib group and trastuzumab group were further analyzed.In multivariate analysis,lapatinib group was associated with a longer PFS,after controlling other potential confounders(HR=0.68,95%CI,0.52-0.90;P=0.006).Conclusions:The combination of TKIs and chemotherapy was effective in this cohort previously treated with trastuzumab treatment.Therefore,TKIs combined with chemotherapy is an option for Chinese HER2-positive MBC patients previously treated with trastuzumab treatment.

CMAB009 plus irinotecan versus irinotecan-only as second-line treatment after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients:promising findings from a prospective,open-label,randomized,phase III trial

Background:The 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin(FOLFOX)regimen is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC),however,the optimal second-line regimen for KRAS wild-type mCRC patients is still investigational.In this study,we aimed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of CMAB009 plus irinotecan compared to irinotecan-only as a second-line regimen for treating KRAS wild-type mCRC patients.Methods:Patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who had previously failed to respond to FOLFOX treatment were ran-domly assigned in a 2:1 ratio,to receive CMAB009 plus irinotecan or irinotecan-only.Patients receiving irinotecan-only were permitted to switch to CMAB009 therapy on disease progression and were grouped as the sequential-CMAB009 arm.The primary endpoints were overall response rate(ORR)and median progression-free survival(PFS).The second-ary endpoints were median overall survival(OS),disease control rate(DCR),clinical benefit rate(CBR),and duration of response(DOR).Results:The CMAB009 plus irinotecan arm demonstrated significantly improved ORR(33.2%vs.12.8%;P<0.001)and longer median PFS(169 days vs.95 days;P<0.001)as compared to the irinotecan-only arm.Patients receiv-ing CMAB009 plus irinotecan also demonstrated improved DCR(80.1%vs.65.2%,P<0.001),CBR(30.0%vs.14.6%,P<0.001),and DOR(210 days vs.109 days;P<0.001)as compared to irinotecan-only.However,patients treated with CMAB009 had an increased risk of skin rash(66.9%vs.5.5%,P<0.001)and paronychia(9.8%vs.0.0%,P<0.001).Anti-drug antibodies(ADA)were detected in 3.6%of patients,and only 0.9%of patients who received CMAB009 experienced hypersensitivity reactions.In patients receiving sequential-CMAB009 therapy after failure with irinotecan,their median PFS was 84 days (95% CI 65 to 113 days). The median OS was 425 days for patients receiving CMAB009 plus irinotecan and 401 days for those with sequential-CMAB009 (P = 0.940). Conclusions: Treatment with CMAB009 plus irinotecan was found to be a superior second-line regimen in com-parison to irinotecan-only in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients. Further, switching to CMAB009 can be considered as an efficient third-line of treatment after treatment failure with second-line irinotecan-only. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01550055, retrospectively registered on March 9, 2012.

Clinical outcomes of second-line treatment following first-line VEGFR-TKI failure in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma:a comparison of axitinib alone and axitinib plus anti-PD-1 antibody

Dear editor,The prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma(mRCC)has been significantly improvedwith the development and widespread use of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)pathway inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin(mTOR)pathway inhibitors[1].For the past decade,the standard of care utilized in the first-line setting was VEGF-targeted therapies.Recently,the mRCC treatment landscape has rapidly changed with the exploration of combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)and anti-VEGF agents[2,3].

Ramucirumab as a second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: reaching out further to patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)occurs at a rate of 3-5%per year in patients with compensated cirrhosis,and itoften represents the first disease complication and themain cause of death in these patients(1).Surveillance forHCC is recommended by all liver disease associations,as it increases patient survival mainly as a result of earlydiagnosis of the tumour,allowing most patients to conveyto curative treatments(2,3).

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan vs irinotecan as second-line treatment in pancreatic cancer patients:a randomized–controlled open-label Phase II study

Background:Limited second-line therapeutic options are available for metastasis pancreatic cancer(mPC).We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan(IROX)in mPC patients.Methods:This is an open-label,Phase 2,randomized study of mPC patients(aged 18–75 years)who failed when using gemcitabine plus S-1 as first-line therapy.Block randomization with a block size of four was used to randomly assign patients(1:1)between October 2015 and December 2017 to receive either IROX(oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 and irinotecan 160mg/m2)or irinotecan monotherapy(irinotecan 180mg/m^(2))until disease progression,unacceptable adverse events,or consent withdrawal.The primary end point was overall survival,and the secondary end points were progression-free survival,overall response rate,and adverse event rate.Results:A total of 74 patients were enrolled in this study,including 44 males and 30 females,with an average age of 61 years.The median overall survival was 10.2 and 6.7 months(adjusted hazard ratio[HR],0.7;95%confidence interval[CI],0.4–1.2;P=0.20)and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 and 2.3 months(adjusted HR,0.4;95%CI,0.2–0.6;P<0.01)in the IROX group and irinotecan group,respectively.The overall response rates were 18.4%(7/38)in the IROX group and 5.5%(2/36)in the irinotecan group(P=0.06).Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 34%(13/38)of patients in the IROX group and 19%(7/36)of patients in the irinotecan group(P=0.15).Conclusions:IROX had no significant survival benefit over irinotecan monotherapy in our study.However,IROX reduced the risk of disease progression by 60%,with acceptable toxicity.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of epilepsy: electromagnetic stimulation-mediated neuromodulation therapy and new technologies

Epilepsy is a severe,relapsing,and multifactorial neurological disorder.Studies regarding the accurate diagnosis,prognosis,and in-depth pathogenesis are crucial for the precise and effective treatment of epilepsy.The pathogenesis of epilepsy is complex and involves alterations in variables such as gene expression,protein expression,ion channel activity,energy metabolites,and gut microbiota composition.Satisfactory results are lacking for conventional treatments for epilepsy.Surgical resection of lesions,drug therapy,and non-drug interventions are mainly used in clinical practice to treat pain associated with epilepsy.Non-pharmacological treatments,such as a ketogenic diet,gene therapy for nerve regeneration,and neural regulation,are currently areas of research focus.This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathogenesis,diagnostic methods,and treatments of epilepsy.It also elaborates on the theoretical basis,treatment modes,and effects of invasive nerve stimulation in neurotherapy,including percutaneous vagus nerve stimulation,deep brain electrical stimulation,repetitive nerve electrical stimulation,in addition to non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation.Numerous studies have shown that electromagnetic stimulation-mediated neuromodulation therapy can markedly improve neurological function and reduce the frequency of epileptic seizures.Additionally,many new technologies for the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy are being explored.However,current research is mainly focused on analyzing patients’clinical manifestations and exploring relevant diagnostic and treatment methods to study the pathogenesis at a molecular level,which has led to a lack of consensus regarding the mechanisms related to the disease.

The emerging role of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles to ameliorate hippocampal NLRP3 inflammation induced by binge-like ethanol treatment in adolescence

Our previous studies have reported that activation of the NLRP3(NOD-,LRR-and pyrin domain-containing protein 3)-inflammasome complex in ethanol-treated astrocytes and chronic alcohol-fed mice could be associated with neuroinflammation and brain damage.Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles(MSC-EVs)have been shown to restore the neuroinflammatory response,along with myelin and synaptic structural alterations in the prefrontal cortex,and alleviate cognitive and memory dysfunctions induced by binge-like ethanol treatment in adolescent mice.Considering the therapeutic role of the molecules contained in mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles,the present study analyzed whether the administration of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles isolated from adipose tissue,which inhibited the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome,was capable of reducing hippocampal neuroinflammation in adolescent mice treated with binge drinking.We demonstrated that the administration of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorated the activation of the hippocampal NLRP3 inflammasome complex and other NLRs inflammasomes(e.g.,pyrin domain-containing 1,caspase recruitment domain-containing 4,and absent in melanoma 2,as well as the alterations in inflammatory genes(interleukin-1β,interleukin-18,inducible nitric oxide synthase,nuclear factor-kappa B,monocyte chemoattractant protein-1,and C–X3–C motif chemokine ligand 1)and miRNAs(miR-21a-5p,miR-146a-5p,and miR-141-5p)induced by binge-like ethanol treatment in adolescent mice.Bioinformatic analysis further revealed the involvement of miR-21a-5p and miR-146a-5p with inflammatory target genes and NOD-like receptor signaling pathways.Taken together,these findings provide novel evidence of the therapeutic potential of MSC-derived EVs to ameliorate the hippocampal neuroinflammatory response associated with NLRP3 inflammasome activation induced by binge drinking in adolescence.

Efficacy and safety of domestic dasatinib as second-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia patients in the chronic phase

Objective To investigate the efficiency and safety of domestic tyrosine kinase inhibitor(TKI)dasatinib(Yinishu)as second-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase(CML-CP).Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data of CML-CP patients who received domestic dasatinib as second-line treatment in the CML collaborative group hospitals of Hubei province from March 2016 to July 2018 was performed.The optimal response rate,the cumulative complete cytogenetic response(CCyR),the cumulative major molecular responses(MMR),progression free survival(PFS),event free survival(EFS)and adverse effects(AEs)of the patients were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months of treatment.Results A total of 83 CML-CP patients were enrolled in this study.The median followup time was 23 months.The optimal response rates at 3,6 and 12 months in 83 CML-CP patients treated with dasatinib were 77.5%(54/71),72.6%(61/75)and 60.7%(51/69),respectively.By the end of followup,the cumulative CCyR and MMR rates were 65.5%(55/80)and 57.1%(48/73),respectively.The median time to achieve CCyR and MMR was 3 months.During follow-up time,the PFS rate was 94.0%(79/83)and the EFS rate was 77.4%(65/83).The most common non-hematological AEs of dasatinib were edema(32.5%),rash itching(18.1%)and fatigue(13.3%).The common hematological AEs of dasatinib were thrombocytopenia(31.3%),leukopenia(19.3%)and anemia(6.0%).Conclusion Domestic dasatinib was effective and safe as the second-line treatment of CML-CP patients and it can be used as an option for CML-CP patients.

Levofloxacin/amoxicillin-based schemes vs quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in second-line

Worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection is approximately 50%,with the highest being in developing countries.We compared cure rates and tolerability(SE) of second-line anti-H.pylori levofloxacin/amoxicillin(LA)-based triple regimens vs standard quadruple therapy(QT).An English language literature search was performed up to October 2010.A meta-analysis was performed including randomized clinical trials comparing 7-or 10-d LA with 7-d QT.In total,10 articles and four abstracts were identified.Overall eradication rate in LA was 76.5%(95% CI:64.4%-97.6%).When only 7-d regimens were included,cure rate was 70.6%(95% CI:40.2%-99.1%),whereas for 10-d combinations,cure rate was significantly higher(88.7%;95% CI:56.1%-109.9%;P < 0.05).Main eradication rate for QT was 67.4%(95% CI:49.7%-67.9%).The 7-d LA and QT showed comparable efficacy [odds ratio(OR):1.09;95% CI:0.63-1.87],whereas the 10-d LA regimen was significantly more effective than QT(OR:5.05;95% CI:2.74-9.31;P < 0.001;I 2 = 75%).No differences were reported in QT eradication rates among Asian and European studies,whereas LA regimens were more effective in European populations(78.3% vs 67.7%;P = 0.05).Incidence of SE was lower in LA therapy than QT(OR:0.39;95% CI:0.18-0.85;P = 0.02).A higher rate of side effects was reported in Asian patients who received QT.Our findings support the use of 10-d LA as a simple second-line treatment for H.pylori eradication with an excellent eradication rate and tolerability.The optimal second-line alternative scheme might differ among countries depending on quinolone resistance.