Analgesic Efficacy of Intrathecal Bupivacaine with or without Morphine in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery. A Comparative Study

Background: Lower limb orthopaedic surgeries are commonly associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Adequate pain relief is essential for patients undergoing such procedures, as uncontrolled pain can lead to delayed recovery, prolonged hospitalization, and increased morbidity. Intrathecal administration of bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, has been shown to provide effective analgesia after lower limb orthopaedic surgery. However, the duration of analgesia with bupivacaine alone is limited, and the addition of an opioid, such as morphine, can prolong the duration of analgesia. Objective: The objective of this study was to document the comparative effect of adding morphine to intrathecal bupivacaine or only intrathecal bupivacaine for lower limb trauma orthopedic surgeries in terms of onset of action, duration of analgesia, pain severity, and side effects. Methods: This was a comparative longitudinal study design conducted at the Orthopaedic Unit of the Tamale Teaching Hospital. A simple random sampling technique was used to recruit 60 patients. A standard structured questionnaire was also used to collect data on the socio-demographics, and clinical features of patients, drug used,side effects and severity of pain at 24,48 and 72 hrs after surgery. Results: Co-administration of intrathecal bupivacaine with morphine produced good and long-lasting postoperative analgesia with a mean time of 1004.25 ± 310.43 minutes, whiles using only bupivacaine produced shorter postoperative analgesia with a mean time of 294.75 ± 195.53 minutes. The p-value p values of p = 0.635 and p = 0.689 respectively. Conclusion: The study revealed that co-administration of intrathecal bupivacaine with morphine emerged as a better option for postoperative pain management after lower limb orthopedic surgeries as compared to administering only bupivacaine regarding the duration of analgesia. Milder side effects like pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were seen in group B than in group A and were promptly well managed to the patient’s satisfaction.

Liposomal Bupivacaine in Erector Spinae Plane Block and Interscalene Block for Scapular and Proximal Humerus Resections

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block that was first described in 2016. It is considered an alternative for brachial plexus blocks in shoulder surgeries as the erector spinae muscle extends to the cervical level. Herein, we present a successful multilevel ESPB plus an interscalene block using liposomal bupivacaine in a 45-year-old female patient with metastatic sarcoma who presented for scapula and proximal humerus resection. The post-operative course was smooth, and the patient was discharged home on post-operative day 2 with minimal narcotic requirements.

Effects of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on rat myometrium

Objective： To study the effect of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on the contractility of isolated uterine muscle strips from pregnant and non-pregnant female rats. Methods： Full-thick myometrial strips were prepared from 18- to 2 l-day pregnant （n=8） and non-pregnant rats （n=7）. After contractions became regular, strips were exposed to cumulative concentrations of the two drugs from 10^-8 to 10^-4 mol/L, amplitude and frequency of the uterine contraction was recorded. Results： Two local anesthetics caused a concentration dependent inhibition on contractility of myometrial strips from pregnant and non-pregnant rats. In the myometrium from non-pregnant rats, -log/C50 of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine were 4.85 and 4.25 respectively. In the myometrium from pregnant rats, similar concentrations of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine were observed, -log/C50 were 2.7 and 2.9 respectively. Levobupivacaine produced an increase in amplitude of contractions, while bupivacaine showed an increased trend in frequency. Conclusion： These results demonstrate that levobupivacaine and bupivacaine may inhibit myometrium contractility. The inhibitory effect of levobupivacaine or bupivacaine is not enhanced by gestation in rat. Levobupivacaine may have more positive influence than bupivacaine in pregnant myometrium.

Comparison between intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy

AIM: To compare the effect of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on the quality of the block, patient satisfaction, and discharge time in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery under unilateral spinal anesthesia.METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for elective ambulatory knee arthroscopy were randomly assigned to four double-blind groups. To achieve a unilateral spinal block, Group BF received 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 20 μg of fentanyl intrathecally, Group LF received 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus 20 μg of fentanyl intrathecally, Group B received 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally, and Group L received 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine intrathecally. The level and duration of the sensory block, the intensity and duration of the motor block, the time to first analgesic requirement, and the time elapsed until the patient's discharge were recorded. Hemodynamic values and adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS: The duration of time needed to reach the T12 dermatome level was significantly longer in Group L [7(3-20) min] than in Group B [6(3-12) min](P = 0.006). The maximum sensory level reached on the side undergoing the operation was significantly higher in Group BF than in Group B(P < 0.05). The intensity of the motor blockade was greater in Group BF than in Group LF and L. Complete recovery from motor blockade occurred earlier in Groups LF [75(45-165) min] and L [63(35-120) min] than in Group BF [115(60-180) min](P < 0.05). The length of time needed for the sensory block to regress to the level of S2 was shorter in Group L(154 ± 50) than in Group BF(192 ± 66)(P < 0.05). The quality of the block was significantly lower in Group L than in Groups BF, LF and B(P = 0.012, P = 0.003, and P < 0.001, respectively). The time elapsed until Visual Analog Scale ≥ 4 was significantly shorter in Group L(110 ± 48) than in Groups BF(200 ± 60), LF(156 ± 61) and B(162 ± 52)(P < 0.05). The time elapsed until the patient's discharge was shorter in Groups B(244 ± 54) and L(229 ± 55) than in Group BF(288 ± 64)(P = 0.021 and P = 0.001, respectively). There were no differences among the groups regarding hemodynamic parameters and adverse events, except for pruritus. The occurrence of pruritus was significantly more frequent in Groups BF and LF than in other groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus 20 μg of fentanyl provided a better spinal anesthesia than 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine alone.

A Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia with Levobupivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Cesarean Sections:A Randomized Trial

Purpose: Levobupivacaine showed a lower risk of cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity than bupivacaine which is the most popular local anesthetic agent in obstetric practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of levobupivacaine compared with hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Methods: 60 pregnant women in ASA I - II group scheduled to have elective cesarean operation were allocated into the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The combinations 10 mg levobupivacaine (0.5%) + fentanyl (15 μcg) for Group LF (n = 30) patients, 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) + fentanyl (15 μcg) for BF (n = 30) patients were intrathecally administrated a total of 2.3 cc. Sensory and motor block characteristics of the groups were assessed with pinprick and Bromage scale;observed hemodynamic changes and side effects were recorded. Results: The time to reach maximum dermatome for the sensory block, time to regression by two dermatomes and time to regress to T12 dermatome was found to be significantly long in Group BF. It was observed that in Group BF, the evolution of the motor block was faster and lasted longer. Whereas hypotension, bradycardia and nausea were less in Group LF, the need for ephedrine was higher in Group BF (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Since motor block time is shorter, and side effects like hypotension, bradycardia and nausea are less, the combination of levobupivacaine + fentanyl can be a good alternative in cesarean sections.

Effects of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine on Rabbit Myocardial Energetic Metabolism and Mitochondria Oxidation

To compare the cardiotoxicity induced by ropivacaine and bupivacaine and to investigate the mechanism of cardiotoxicity, 24 mature New Zealand rabbits were divided randomly into control group (group C), ropivacaine group (group R) and bupivacaine group (group B). Hearts were drawn out rapidly from the anesthetized animals and cardiac perfu-sion was performed immediately. Ropivacaine 500 ng/ml (group R) or bupivacaine 500 ng/ml (group B) was added to the perfusion solution. Ventricular myocardial ATP, ADP and AMP were measured with high performance liquid chro-matogram. The ability of myocardial mitochondria oxidation to pyruvate or palmitoylcarnitine was detected with Clark electrode. Our results showed that myocardial ATP and ADP decreased significantly (P<0. 05) in group R and most significantly (P<0. 01) in group B as compared with group C. Myocardial ATP and ADP decreased most significantly (P<0. 01) in group B as compared with group R. The changes of myocardial AMP revealed significant difference among three groups. The changes of pyruvate oxidation exibited no significant difference among the three groups. Palmitoylcarnitine oxidation decreased markedly (P<0. 05) in group R and most significantly (P<0. 01) in group B as compared with group C. The present study indicated that the inhibition of lipid substrate oxidation may be responsible for the cardiotoxicity induced by bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The cardiotoxicity induced by ropivacaine is far more less than bupivacaine.

Extracts from rabbit skin inflamed by the vaccinia virus attenuate bupivacaine-induced spinal neurotoxicity in pregnant rats

Extracts from rabbit skin inflamed by the vaccinia virus can relieve pain and promote repair of nerve injury. The present study intraperitoneally injected extracts from rabbit skin inflamed by the vaccinia virus for 3 and 4 days prior to and following intrathecal injection of bupivacaine into pregnant rats. The pain threshold test after bupivacaine injection showed that the maximum possible effect of tail-flick latency peaked 1 day after intrathecal injection of bupivacaine in the extract-pretreatment group, and gradually decreased, while the maximum possible effect in the bupivacaine group continued to increase after intrathecal injection of bupivacaine. Histological observation showed that after 4 days of intrathecal injection of bupivacaine, the number of shrunken, vacuolated, apoptotic and caspase-9-positive cells in the dorsal root ganglion in the extract-pretreatment group was significantly reduced compared with the bupivacaine group. These findings indicate that extracts from rabbit skin inflamed by the vaccinia virus can attenuate neurotoxicity induced by intrathecal injection of bupivacaine in pregnant rats, possibly by inhibiting caspase-9 protein expression and suppressing nerve cell apoptosis.

Subrectal and Subcutaneous Wound Infiltration with Bupivacaine versus Pethidine for Post Cesarean Section Pain Relief: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Cesarean section (CS), one of the most common major operative procedures, performed all over the world. Incisional infiltration with local anesthetics is a simple, cheap and effective mean of providing good analgesia for surgical operations without any major side effects & allowing early patients’ mobilization & postoperative recovery, so the purpose of study is to compare between the effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine versus pethidine for post cesarean section pain relief. Patients and Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in Ain Shams University Maternity hospital in the period from August 2016 and January 2017. 100 full term pregnant females randomized into two groups: Group A (50 patients) Bupivacaine group: Subcutaneous and subrectal infiltration with 10 ml 0.25% Bupivacaine (2.5 mg/ml) diluted in 10 ml normal saline before closure of the wound was done;Group B (50 patients) Pethidine group: Subcutaneous and subrectal infiltration with 1 ml pethidine (50 mg/ml) diluted in 19 ml normal saline before closure of the wound was done. All patients had cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Study outcome measures post-operative pain scores using visual analogue scale, post-operative analgesia requirement time to first rescue analgesia, onset of mobilization, side effect of local anesthetic, wound infection (after one week). It was registered on clinical trials.gov with ID: NCT03652116. Results: Visual analogue scale values differ significantly between pethidine group and that of bupivacaine at rest and on coughing at 4, 8, 12, 24 hours & analgesic consumption (P value st time request analgesia per minute comparing group A to group B (P value 0.001). There is no significant difference between bupivacaine and pethidine regarding time of ambulation, side effects or complications. Conclusion: Infiltration of the wound of cesarean section with pethidine gives effective analgesia for several hours as compared to Bupivacaine.

Treatment of intractable chronic pelvic pain syndrome by injecting a compound of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl into sacral spinal space

Objective：To investigate the effect of injecting a compound of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl into sacral spinal space to treat chronic pelvic pain syndrome （CPPS）. Methods： A total of 36 men with recalcitrant （TPPS refractory to multiple prior therapies were treated with the injection of a compound of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl （10 ml of 0. 125% Bupivacaine, 0.05 mg Fentanyl, 5 mg Dexamethasone, 100 mg Vitamin B1 and 1 mg Vitamin B12） into sacral space once a week for 4 weeks. The National Institute of Heahh Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index （NIH-CPSI）, maximum and average flow rate were performed al the start and the end of 4 weeks＇ therapy. Results：Mean NIH-CPSI total score was decreased from 26. 5±1.6 to 13.4±2.0 （p〈0.001）. Significant improvement was seen in each subscore domain. A total of 32 patients （89%） had at least 25% improvement on NIH-CPSI and 22 （61%） had at least 50% improvement. Maximal and average flow rate were increased from 19. 5±3. 8 to 23. 6±4. 2 and 10. 9±2.6 to 14.3±2.4 respectively. Conclusion： Injection of this compound of Bupivacaine, Fentanyl and Dexamethasone into sacred spinal space is an effective and safe approach for recalcitrant CPPS. Further study of the mechanisms and prospective placebo controlled trials are warranted.

Comparing the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine When Used as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks under Ultrasound-Guided

Background: Ultrasound-guided for regional anesthesia offers many potential benefits in the emergency setting. Analgesia can be explicitly targeted to the region of pain and provide relief for many hours and decrease needing to the large volume of local anesthetic. The aim of the work: Comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine when used as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks on the onset of sensory, motor blockade and postoperative analgesia. Patients and methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical study conducted on 60 patients underwent upper limb surgery done by ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block;these patients allocated into two equal groups: Group I (control) received 20 ccs (19 cc bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 cc saline), Group II received 20 cc (19 cc bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 cc volume of Dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg). Results: Demographic data and surgical characteristics were comparable in both groups. The onset times for sensory and motor blocks were significantly shorter in Group II than Group I (P Conclusion: We recommend adding Dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks to take advantage of the prolonged time of both sensory and motor blocks and prolonged postoperative analgesia.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltrated into the Posterior Capsule for Postoperative Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

Achieving adequate control of postsurgical pain remains a challenge in patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this study was to assess if liposomal bupivacaine injected into the posterior capsule, in combination with a femoral nerve block and multimodal pain control regimen, would result in better pain control. The two groups were similar with regards to demographics and method of intraoperative anesthesia. Infiltration into the posterior capsule with liposomal bupivacaine had significantly lower resting pain scores compared to the saline group. Patients in the liposomal bupivacaine group also used slightly less breakthrough narcotic (5.75 to 4.31 mg of morphine equivalence). We recommend the use of infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine into the posterior capsule as an adjunct in multimodal analgesia in TKA patients to reduce pain and resultant narcotic use.

A Retrospective Comparison of Interscalene Continuous Catheter Verse Single-Injection with Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: One common method of pain control for total shoulder arthroplasty is long-duration delivery of local anesthetic via interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) with a continuous catheter. Alternatively, liposomal bupivacaine has also been administered as an ISB as a means to prolong the analgesic effect. This study was completed to measure the non-inferiority of single-injection ISB with liposomal bupivacaine compared with ISB continuous catheter for total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty using either an ISB continuous catheter or a single injection ISB with liposomal bupivacaine for post operative analgesia. The primary goal of this study was to determine if single-injection with liposomal bupivacaine conferred non-inferior pain scores compared to the continuous catheter. Secondary outcomes evaluated oxygen saturation as a measure of hemidiaphragmatic paresis, post operative opioid requirements, and difference in cost. Results: We identified 333 patients for the study: 126 received continuous catheter and 207 received single-injection with liposomal bupivacaine. The median length of stay was 1 day. Pain scores for those treated with single-injection with liposomal bupivacaine were non-inferior to pain scores of those treated with the continuous catheter on post-op days 0, 1 and 2. Pain scores were lower for single-injection with liposomal bupivacaine patients on days 3 and 4, however they did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in oxygen saturation between the two groups. Both groups had similar daily morphine milligram equivalent requirements. Liposomal bupivacaine ISB was also found to be less expensive. Conclusion: Single-injection ISB with liposomal bupivacaine provides non-inferior analgesia at a reduced cost compared with continuous catheter ISB for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Effects of labor analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcome by epidural low concentration of bupivacaine combined with anisodamine

Objective To observe the effects of labor analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcome by epidural application of 0.125% bupivacaine combined with anisodamine on the labor stage, and modes of delivery and neonatal Apgar’s score. Methods A total of 220 primiparaes with full-term pregnancy, monocyesis and fetal head presentation without any obstetrical or systematic complications were chosen and divided into analgesic group and control group (110 in each group). The mixture of bupivacaine and anisodamine was injected into the epidural space of the parturients in the analgesic group while those patients in the control group did not receive any analgesics. Results The analgesic effect was satisfactory (91.8%), and no side effects occurred in the second stage of labor. The instrument delivery rate was lower in the analgesic group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in neonatal Apgar’s score. Conclusion The method is feasible in clinic for labor pain relief without increasing the rate of dystocia and complications of delivery.

Comparison of impact of adjuvant treatment of midazolam, fentanyl, and magnesium sulfate with intrathecal bupivacaine on block characteristics and postoperative analgesia in knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial

Objective:To compare the efficacy of midazolam,fentanyl,and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to intrathecal bupivacaine on both block characteristics and postoperative analgesia in knee arthroplasty.Methods:This randomized double-blind clinical trial recruited spinal anesthesia patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists classⅠorⅡ,who needed knee arthroplasty.Patients were stratified into three intervention groups,including the midazolam group,the fentanyl group,and the magnesium sulfate group,and the patients were administered with midazolam,fentanyl,and magnesium sulfate,respectively.Hemodynamic parameters,sensory and motor block,and pain score(Visual Analogue Scale)were measured and compared among the three groups.Results:A total of 105 patients were included in this study with 35 patients in each group.There was no statistically significant difference in terms of oxygen saturation,mean blood pressure,duration of surgery,and postoperative complications,including nausea,vomiting,bradycardia,dizziness,and hypotension,as well as the time of opioid administration among the three groups(P>0.05).Statistically significant differences were found in terms of heart rate at 15,30,45,60,75,and 105 min after beginning of operation among the three groups,which was lower in the midazolam group(P<0.05).The midazolam group showed a shorter time to achieve sensory block after spinal anesthesia,sensory block to T8 or higher and sensory block to T12 and L1(P<0.05).Besides,the three groups showed significantly differences in terms of onset of motor block after spinal anesthesia and time to achieve motor block to T8 or higher or Bromage score 3(P=0.001).No significant difference was noted in pain scores among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Midazolam resulted in a shorter time to achieve sensory and motor block to T8 or higher,the onset of motor block and sensory block after spinal anesthesia,and time to achieve sensory block to T12 and L1,and the pain scores were not significantly different among the groups.Thus,midazolam can be highly underlined,if a shorter onset of sensory and motor blocks is targeted.[Funded by the research deputy of Arak University of Medical Sciences(No.99258);fa.irct.ir number,IRCT20141209020258N164].

Effects on newborns of applying bupivacaine combined with different doses of fentanyl for cesarean section

BACKGROUND The choice of anesthesia for cesarean section is very important.AIM To compare the effects of applying bupivacaine combined with different doses of fentanyl on newborns after cesarean section.METHODS We randomly divided one hundred and twenty patients undergoing cesarean section into the following 4 groups:group B(bupivacaine group),group BF10(bupivacaine combined with 10μg fentanyl),group BF30(bupivacaine combined with 30μg fentanyl)and group BF50(bupivacaine combined with 50μg fentanyl).The heart rate,mean arterial pressure,block plane fixation time and sensory block time were recorded.Umbilical artery blood was then collected immediately after fetal delivery for blood gas analysis and qualitative detection of fentanyl.Additionally,data on the neonatal 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores,results of umbilical artery blood gas analysis and qualitative detection of fentanyl in umbilical artery blood were recorded.RESULTS Although the mean arterial pressure decreased in all four groups at 3 min after anesthesia,the percentage of the decrease was less than 20%of the baseline.In addition,there were no significant differences in the 1-min or 5-min Apgar scores or the umbilical artery blood gas analysis among the four groups(P>0.05).Moreover,the concentration of fentanyl in umbilical artery blood was qualitatively detected using an ELISA kit,and the results in the four groups were negative.CONCLUSION Bupivacaine combined with fentanyl spinal anesthesia is effective in cesarean section.

NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHESIS INHIBITION ENHANCES BUPIVACAINE CARDIOTOXICITY

There is evidence that local anesthetic-induced seizures may be mediated by NMDA receptors which activate production of nitric oxide(NO).The objective of this study was to determine the effects,if any,of inhibition of NO synthesis on the responses of the central nervous and cardiovascular systems to bupivacaine.Sprague Dawley rats were assigned to two groups.The lightly anesthetized (0.5% halothane,70% N2O) and paralyzed (doxacurium) animals were given a NO synthase inhibitor[L-NAME,2 mg/(kg.min);n=6 ] of saline(n=5) i.v.for 30 min.Then bupivacaine was administered i.v. [2mg/(kg. min)]to both groups of animals until asystole.Arterial blood samples for bupivacaine concentration analysis (by HPLC)were taken during the stabilization period and during local anesthetic infusion. Student's t-test was used to determine significant differences(P< 0. 05) between groups. Average doses of bupivacaine that produced arrhythmias and asystole were remarkably lower in L-NAME vs. saline treated rats[arrhythmias (5.1±2.0)vs.(15.8±3. 8)mg/kg; asystole (15. 9±3. 2)vs.(27. 8±6.1)mg/kg; both P<0.05 ].The doses producing seizures and isoelectric EEG,and the duration of seizures did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups.However, EEG epileptiform activity was less intense (lower amplitude,shorter duration ietal activity) in the L-NAME treated animals.Arterial plasma concentrations of bupivacaine 5 min after the start of bupivacaine infusion were significantly higher in the L-NAME group.[(22, 3 ±2. 9)vs. (12. 8±1.5)mg/L, P<0. 05 ].These results suggest that NO synthase inhibition by L-NAME enhances the cardiac toxicity of bupivacaine probably by a pharmacokinetic action and reduces the central nervous system toxicity of bupivacaine probably by a pharmacodynamic action.

Comparative study of caudal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with tramadol for postoperative analgesia in paediatric cancer patients

Objective:Caudal epidural analgesia has become very common analgesic technique in paediatric surgery.Adding tramadol to bupivacaine for caudal injection prolongs duration of analgesia with minimal side effects.The aim of the study was to investigate the different effects of caudal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with thamadol for postoperative analgesia in paediatric cancer patients.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted over 40 paediatric cancer patients who were recruited from Children Cancer Hospital of Egypt(57357 Hospital).Patients were randomized into 2 groups:bupivacaine group(group B,20 patients) to receive single shot caudal block of 1 mL/kg 0.1875% bupivacaine;tramadol group(group T,20 patients) prepared as group B with the addition of 1 mg/kg caudal tramadol.Results:The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer among group T than group B [(24 ± 13.7) hours versus(7 ± 3.7) hours respectively with P = 0.001].Group T showed a significantly lower mean FLACC score than group B(2.2 ± 0.9 versus 3.6 ± 0.6 with P = 0.002).The difference in FLACC score was comparable on arrival,and after 2 and 4 hours.At 8 and 12 hours the group B recorded significantly higher scores(P = 0.002 and 0.0001 respectively).There were no significant differences between the groups as regards sedation score [the median in both groups was 1(0-1) with P value = o.8].No one developed facial flush or pruritis.Conclusion:Caudal injection of low dose tramadol 1 mg/kg with bupivacaine 0.1875% is proved to be effective,long standing technique for postoperative analgesia in major paediatric cancer surgery and almost devoid of side effect.

Comparison of Parasternal Intercostal Block Using Ropivacaine or bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for parasternal intercostal block for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Design: A randomized, controlled, prospective, double blind study. Setting: A tertiary care teaching hospital. Participants: One Hundred children scheduled for cardiac surgery through a median sternotomy were divided into 3 groups of at least 33 children each, receiving either ropivacaine, bupivacaine or saline (control). Interventions: A bilateral parasternal block performed either with 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.25% bupiacaine or 0.9% saline with 5 doses of 0.5 mL on each side in the 2nd to 6th parasternal intercostal spaces 1 to 1.5 cm lateral to the sternal edge, before sternal wound closure. Measurements and Main Results: The time to extubation was significantly less in children administered the parasternal blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine compared to the saline (control) group. The pain scores were lower and comparable in the ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups compared to the saline group. The cumulative fentanyl dose requirement over a 24-hour period was higher in the saline group than the ropivacaine (p < 0.001) and bupivacaine group. No side effects were observed in any of the children. Conclusions: Parasternal blocks either with ropivacaine or bupivacaine appear to be a simple, safe, and useful technique for supplementation of postoperative analgesia in children undergoing cardiac surgery with a median sternotomy.

A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Injection of Bupivacaine Alone or with Fentanyl, Clonidine, and Neostigmine in Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Background: Anesthesiologists are responsible for the development of pain services in the current era. Hence ideal adjuvants that can be used with bupivacaine for stable intraoperative conditions and prolonging the postoperative analgesia with fewer side effects are being investigated. Opioids, despite useful as adjuvants, are associated with undesirable side effects. Aim of the work: The study was done to compare analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic of intrathecal injection of bupivacaine alone or with fentanyl, clonidine, and neostigmine in lower abdominal surgeries, over the first 24 postoperative hours, in a randomized, double-blind, and clinical trial. Methods: 100 Patients were randomized into four equal groups, 25 patients in each group;Group B patients received 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 ml of normal saline. Group BF patients received 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with (25 mics) of fentanyl. Group BC patients received 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.5 ml (75 mics) of clonidine. Group BN patients received 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.1 ml of neostigmine (50 mics) and 0.4 ml of normal saline. Intrathecal anesthesia was done with a recording of parameters intraoperative and the post-operative period. Each patient was assessed for hemodynamic parameters and effective analgesia in operation, and presence of complications (nausea, vomiting, sedation and pruritus) visual analogue pain score (VAS) postoperatively by a blinded investigator in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 12, 18 and 24 h postoperatively. Results: The postoperative analgesia is more effective with group BC (the gold standard) than group B, group BF, and group BN. As regard complications during the study in all groups, complications as nausea, and vomiting were mainly with group BN;hypotension was primarily in group BC. Conclusion: Bupivacaine clonidine, bupivacaine neostigmine, and bupivacaine fentanyl intrathecal anesthesia produced a longer duration of postoperative analgesia after lower abdominal surgery in patients than bupivacaine alone. Bupivacaine clonidine mixture had the most extended period of analgesia, but with hypotension. So bupivacaine fentanyl mixture with moderate duration of analgesia and minimal side effects is most safe for a patient.

Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) for Reduction in the Use of Postoperative Narcotics in an Obese Patient Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy

Background: Obesity, particularly in the setting of comorbid disease, presents a unique challenge. Clinicians are pursuing areas of multimodal analgesia in an effort to minimize narcotic dosages. Post-operatively, their pain management can be even more challenging, which includes appropriate use of narcotics in a patient that has a high probably of sleep apnea. Aim: To show that the use of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) can provide effective post-operative pain relief and decrease the use of post-operative narcotics. Case: We report on a 62 years old female with a history of hypertension, obesity and a greater than a 40 pack year history of smoking who presented for a modified radical mastectomy with a lymph node dissection. At the end of the case, the patient’s wound was infiltrated with both free bupivacaine and Exparel that minimized her need for post-operative narcotics. Conclusion: We believe that the use of extended release local anesthetics should be considered when there is a need to reduce the use of post-operative narcotics.