Giant Brunner's gland hyperplasia of the duodenum successfully resected en bloc by endoscopic mucosal resection: A case report

BACKGROUND Duodenal Brunner's gland hyperplasia(BGH)is a therapeutic target when complications such as bleeding or gastrointestinal obstruction occur or when malignancy cannot be ruled out.Herein,we present a case of large BGH treated with endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR).CASE SUMMARY An 83-year-old woman presented at our hospital with dizziness.Blood tests revealed severe anemia,esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a 6.5 cm lesion protruding from the anterior wall of the duodenal bulb,and biopsy revealed the presence of glandular epithelium.Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)demonstr-ated relatively high echogenicity with a cystic component.The muscularis propria was slightly elevated at the base of the lesion.EMR was performed without complications.The formalin-fixed lesion size was 6 cm×3.5 cm×3 cm,showing nodular proliferation of non-dysplastic Brunner's glands compartmentalized by fibrous septa,confirming the diagnosis of BGH.Reports of EMR or hot snare polypectomy are rare for duodenal BGH>6 cm.In this case,the choice of EMR was made by obtaining information on the base of the lesion as well as on the internal characteristics through EUS.CONCLUSION Large duodenal lesions with good endoscopic maneuverability and no evident muscular layer involvement on EUS may be resectable via EMR.

Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in treatment of colorectal polyps:A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);however,it is still controversial whether there is a difference in the effectiveness between UEMR and EMR.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps.METHODS Clinical studies comparing the effectiveness or safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps were searched in medical databases,including Pub Med,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,and Wanfang Data,monographs,theses,and papers presented at conferences.Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software.RESULTS Seven non-randomized controlled trials and one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria.In total,1382 patients(1511 polyps)were included in the study,including 722 who received UEMR and 789 who received EMR.In the UEMR and EMR groups,the en bloc resection rates were 85.87%and 73.89%,respectively,with a relative risk(RR)value of 1.14(95%confidence interval[CI]:1.01-1.30;P<0.05).In the sub-group analysis,the en bloc resection rate showed no statistically significant difference between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps less than 20 mm in diameter.However,a statistically significant difference was found between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps equal to or greater than 20 mm in diameter.The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates at 3-6 mo of the UEMR and EMR groups were 3.26%and 15.17%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.27(95%CI:0.09-0.83;P<0.05).The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates of UEMR and EMR at 12 mo were 6.25%and 14.40%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.43(95%CI:0.20-0.92;P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of adverse events was 8.17%and 6.21%,respectively,with an RR value of 1.07(95%CI:0.50-2.30;P>0.05).CONCLUSION UEMR is an effective technique for colorectal polyps and appears to have some advantages over EMR,particularly with regard to some treatment outcomes.

Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm

BACKGROUND The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain.Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice,such as endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and cold or hot snare polypectomy.Recently,EMR with circumferential precutting(EMR-P)has emerged as an effective technique,but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR(CEMR)and EMR-P is limited.AIM To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.METHODS This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China.Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR.EMR-P was performed following submucosal injection,and a circumferential mucosa incision(precutting)was conducted using a snare tip.Primary outcomes included a comparison of the rates of en bloc and R0 resection,defined as one-piece resection and one-piece resection with histologically assessed clear margins,respectively.RESULTS A total of 110 patients in the EMR-P group and 110 patients in the CEMR group were finally evaluated.In the per-protocol analysis,the proportion of en bloc resections was 94.3%[95%confidence interval(CI):88.2%-97.4%]in the EMR-P group and 86%(95%CI:78.2%-91.3%)in the CEMR group(P=0.041),while subgroup analysis showed that for lesions>15 mm,EMR-P also resulted in a higher en bloc resection rate(92.0%vs 58.8%P=0.029).The proportion of R0 resections was 81.1%(95%CI:72.6%-87.4%)in the EMR-P group and 76.6%(95%CI:68.8%-84.4%)in the CEMR group(P=0.521).The EMR-P group showed a longer median procedure time(6.4 vs 3.0 min;P<0.001).No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients with adverse events(EMR-P:9.1%;CEMR:6.4%;P=0.449).CONCLUSION In this study,EMR-P served as an alternative to CEMR for removing nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm,particularly polyps>15 mm in diameter,with higher R0 and en bloc resection rates and without increasing adverse events.However,EMR-P required a relatively longer procedure time than CEMR.Considering its potential benefits for en bloc and R0 resection,EMR-P may be a promising technique in colorectal polyp resection.

Is endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting superior to conventional methods for removing sessile colorectal polyps?

We reviewed a study that reported a comparative analysis of the effects of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)precutting and conventional EMR for removing non-pedunculated,10-20 mm sized colorectal polyps.We identified some statistical deficiencies in this study.In addition,we believe that the differences between the treatments failed to achieve significance,and therefore,further analysis is required.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for the treatment of colorectal tumors.

Endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer: Experiences in Korea

Endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR） has been established as one of the treatment options for early gastric cancer （EGC）. However, there are many uncertain areas such as indications of EIR, best treatment methods, management of complications and follow-up methods after the procedure. Host studies on this topic have been carried out by researchers in Japan. In Korea, gastric cancer is the most common malignant disease, and the second leading cause of cancer death. In these days, EIR for EGC is widely performed in many centers in Korea. In this review, we will provide an overview of the bechniques and outcomes of EIR in Korea.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer

AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in treating superficial esophageal cancer (SEC).

Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection

AIM： To clarify the risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR）. METHODS： A total of 297 consecutive patients who underwent EMR were enrolled. Some of the patients had multiple lesions. Bleeding requiring endoscopic treatment was defined as bleeding after EMR. Odds ratios （OR） with 95% confidence intervals （CI）, calculated by logistic regression with multivariate adjustments for covariates, were the measures of association. RESULTS： Of the 297 patients, 57 （19.2%） patients with bleeding after EMR were confirmed. With multivariate adjustment, the cutting method of EMR, diameter, and endoscopic pattern of the tumor were associated with the risk of bleeding after EMR. The multivariate-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR using endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy was 3.07 （95%CI, 1.59-5.92） compared with strip biopsy. The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for the highest quartile （16-50 mm） of tumor diameter was 5.63 （95%CI, 1.84-17.23） compared with that for the lowest （4-7 mm）. The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for depressed type of tumor was 4.21 （95%CI, 1.75-10.10） compared with elevated type. CONCLUSION： It is important to take tumor charactedstics （tumor size and endoscopic pattern） and cutting method of EMR into consideration in predicting bleeding after EMR.

Ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric heterotopic pancreas

Heterotopic pancreas is a congenital anomaly characterized by ectopic pancreatic tissue.Treatment of heterotopic pancreas may include expectant observation,endoscopic resection or surgery.The aim of this report was to describe the technique of ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) for resection of heterotopic pancreas of the stomach.Two patients(both female,mean age 32 years) were referred for management of gastric subepithelial tumors.Endoscopic ultrasound in both disclosed small hypoechoic masses in the mucosa and submucosa.Band ligation-assisted EMR was performed in both cases without complications.Pathology from the resected tumors revealed heterotopic pancreas arising from the submucosa.Margins were free of pancreatic tissue.Ligation-assisted EMR is technically feasible and may be considered for the endoscopic management of heterotopic pancreas.

Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps in typical UK hospitals

AIM:To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) for colorectal polyps,with particular regard to procedural complications and recurrence rate,in typical United Kingdom(UK) hospitals that perform an average of about 25 colonic EMRs per year.METHODS:A total of 239 colorectal polyps(≥ 10 mm) resected from 199 patients referred to Rochdale Infirmary,Salford Royal Hospital and Royal Oldham Hospital for EMR between January 2003 and January 2009 were studied.RESULTS:The mean size of polyps resected was 19.6 ± 12.4 mm(range 10-80 mm).The overall major complication rate was 2.1%.Complications were less frequent with non-adenomas compared with the other groups(Pearson's χ 2 test,P < 0.0001).Resections of largersized polyps were more likely to result in complications(unpaired t-test,P = 0.021).Recurrence was associated with histology,with carcinoma-in-situ more likely to recur compared with low-grade dysplasia [hazard ratio(HR) 186.7,95% confidence interval(95% CI):8.81-3953.02,P = 0.001].Distal lesions were also more likely to recur compared with right-sided and transverse colon lesions(HR 5.93,95% CI:1.35-26.18,P = 0.019).CONCLUSION:EMR for colorectal polyps can be performed safely and effectively in typical UK hospitals.Stricter follow-up is required for histologically advanced lesions due to increased recurrence risk.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps:A meta-analysis and metaregression with single arm analysis

BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)has shown to be effective in management of colorectal neoplasm in the Asian countries,while its implementation in Western countries where endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is preferred is still debatable.AIM To compare the surgical,histological,and oncological outcomes between ESD and EMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps,with subgroup analysis comparing the efficacy of ESD and EMR between Japan and the rest of the world.METHODS Embase and Medline databases were searched from inception to October 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies comparing en bloc,complete resection,margin involvement,resection time,need for additional surgery,complications,and recurrence rate of ESD with EMR.RESULTS Of 281344 colorectal polyps from 21 studies were included.When compared to EMR,the pooled analysis revealed ESD was associated with higher en bloc and complete resection rate,and lower lateral margin involvement and recurrence.ESD led to increased procedural time,need for additional surgery,and perforation risk.No significant difference in bleeding risk was found between the two groups.Meta-regression analysis suggested only right colonic polyps correlated with an increased perforation risk in ESD.Confounders including polyp size and invasion depth did not significantly influence the en bloc and complete resection rate,bleeding risk and recurrence.In subgroup analysis,Japan performed better than the rest of the world in both ESD and EMR with perforation risk of 4%and 0.0002%,respectively,as compared to perforation risk of 8%and 1%,respectively,in reports coming from rest of the world.CONCLUSION ESD resulted in better resection outcomes and lower recurrence compared to EMR.With appropriate training,ESD is preferred over EMR as the first-line therapy for resection of colorectal polyps,without restricting to lesions greater than 20 mm and those with high suspicion of submucosal invasion.

Endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR） is a technique used to locally excise lesions confined to the mucosa. Its main role is the treatment of advanced dysplasia and early gastrointestinal cancers. EMR was originally described as a therapy for early gastric cancer. Recently its use has expanded as a therapeutic option for ampullary masses, colorectal cancer, and large colorectal polyps. In the Western world, the predominant indication for EMR in the upper gastrointestinal tract is the staging and treatment of advance dysplasia and early neoplasia in Barrett＇s esophagus. This review will describe the basis, indications, techniques, and complications of EMR, and its role in the management of Barrett＇s esophagus.

Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection

AIM:To evaluate the proportion of successful complete cure en-bloc resections of large colorectal polyps achieved by endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR). METHODS:Studies using the EMR technique to resect large colorectal polyps were selected.Successful complete cure en-bloc resection was defined as one piece margin-free polyp resection.Articles were searched for in Medline,Pubmed,and the Cochrane Control Trial Registry,among other sources. RESULTS:An initial search identified 2620 reference articles,from which 429 relevant articles were selected and reviewed.Data was extracted from 25 studies(n =5221)which met the inclusion criteria.All the studies used snares to perform EMR.Pooled proportion of en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 62.85%(95%CI:51.50-73.52).The pooled proportion for complete cure en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 58.66%(95%CI:47.14-69.71).With higher patient load(>200 patients),this complete cure en-bloc resection rate improves from 44.19%(95%CI: 24.31-65.09)to 69.17%(95%CI:51.11-84.61). CONCLUSION:EMR is an effective technique for the resection of large colorectal polyps and offers an alternative to surgery.

Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: An Italian experience

AIM： To evaluate endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR） in patients with high-grade dysplasia （HGD） and/or intramucosal cancer （IMC） in Barrett＇s esophagus （BE）. METHODS： Between June 2000 and December 2003, 39 consecutive patients with HGD （35） and/or IMC （4） underwent EMR. BE 〉30 mm was present in 27 patients. In three patients with short segment BE （25.0%）, HGD was detected in a normal appearing BE. Lesions had a mean diameter of 14.8＋10.3 ram. Mucosal resection was carried out using the cap method. RESULTS： The average size of resections was 19.7± 9.4×14.6＋8.2 mm. Histopathologic assessment postresection revealed 5 low-grade dysplasia （LGD） （12.8%）, 27 HGD （69.2%）, 2 IMC （5.1%）, and 5 SMC （-12.8%）. EMR changed the pre-treatment diagnosis in 10 patients （25.6%）. Three patients with SMC underwent surgery. Histology of the surgical specimen revealed 1 TON0 and 2 TIN0 lesions. The remaining two patients were cancer free at 32.5 and 45.6 mo, respectively. A metachronous lesion was detected after 25 mo in one patient with HGD. Intra-procedural bleeding, controlled at endoscopy, occurred in four patients （10.3%）. After a median follow-up of 34.9 mo, all patients remained in remission. CONCLUSION： In the medium term, EMR is effective and safe to treat HGD and/or IMC within BE and is a valuable staging method. It could become an alternative to surgery.

Large endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors exceeding 4 cm

AIM:To evaluate the feasibility and the outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)for large colorectal tumors exceeding 4 cm(LCRT)undergoing piecemeal resection. METHODS:From January 2005 to April 2008,146 digestive tumors larger than 2 cm were removed with the EMR technique in our department.Of these,34 tumors were larger than 4 cm and piecemeal resection was carried out on 26 colorectal tumors.The mean age of the patients was 71 years.The mean follow-up duration was 12 mo. RESULTS:LCRTs were located in the rectum,left colon,transverse colon and right colon in 58%,15%, 4%and 23%of cases,respectively.All were sessile tumors larger than 4 cm with a mean size of 4.9 cm (4-10 cm).According to the Paris classification,34%of the tumors were typeⅠs,58%typeⅡa,4%typeⅡb and 4%typeⅡc.Pathological examination showed tubulous adenoma in 31%,tubulo-villous adenoma in 27%,villous adenoma in 42%,high-grade dysplasia in38%,in situ carcinoma in 19%of the cases and mucosal carcinoma(m2)in 8%of the cases.The two cases(7.7%)of procedural bleeding that occurred were managed endoscopically and one small perforation was treated with clips.During follow-up,recurrence of the tumor occurred in three patients(12%),three of whom received endoscopic treatment. CONCLUSION:EMR for tumors larger than 4 cm is a safe and effective procedure that could compete with endoscopic submucosal dissection,despite providing incomplete histological assessment.

Analysis of 234 cases of colorectal polyps treated by endoscopic mucosal resection

BACKGROUND Colorectal polyps refer to all neoplasms that protrude into the intestinal cavity.Researchers believe that 50%-70%of colorectal cancers originate from adenomatous polyps.AIM To investigate the endoscopic morphologic features,pathologic types,and clinical situation;evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);and guide clinicians in their daily practice.METHODS Two hundred thirty-four patients who underwent EMR in our hospital from January 1,2018 to December 31,2019 were recruited.Data including sex,age,endoscopic morphology of the polyps,and pathological characteristics were analyzed among groups.RESULTS A total of 295 polyps were resected from the 234 subjects enrolled in the study,of which 4(1.36%)were Yamada type I.There were 75(25.42%)type II,101(34.24%)type III,and 115(38.98%)type IV adenomas.Among them,41 were nonadenomas,110 were low-risk adenomas,139 were high-risk adenomas,and 5 were carcinomas.The differences in distribution were not statistically significant,with P values greater than 0.05.The risk of cancer significantly increased for polyps≥1 cm in diameter(c2=199.825,P=0.00).Regarding the endoscopic morphological features,congestion,erosion,and lobulation were more common on the surface morphology of high-risk adenomas and cancerous polyps(c2=75.257,P=0.00),and most of them were Yamada types III and IV.In all,6 of the 295 polyps could not be removed completely,with a one-time resection rate of 97.97%.There were two cases of postoperative bleeding and no cases of perforation,with an overall complication rate of 0.09%.CONCLUSION Colorectal polyps ranging from non-adenomatous polyps,low-risk adenomas,and high-risk adenomas to adenocarcinomas each has their own endoscopic features,while EMR,as a mature intervention,has good safety and operability and should be promoted clinically,especially at the primary care level.

Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors

BACKGROUND The selection of endoscopic treatments for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors(SNADETs)is controversial.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)for SNADETs.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with SNADETs from a database of endoscopic treatment for SNADETs,which included eight hospitals in Fukuoka,Japan,between April 2001 and October 2017.A total of 142 patients with SNADETs treated with EMR or ESD were analyzed.Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the differences in the patient characteristics between the two groups.We analyzed the treatment outcomes,including the rates of en bloc/complete resection,procedure time,adverse event rate,hospital stay,and local or metastatic recurrence.RESULTS Twenty-eight pairs of patients were created.The characteristics of patients between the two groups were similar after matching.The EMR group had a significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay than those of the ESD group[median procedure time(interquartile range):6(3-10.75)min vs 87.5(68.5-136.5)min,P<0.001,hospital stay:8(6-10.75)d vs 11(8.25-14.75)d,P=0.006].Other outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups(en bloc resection rate:82.1%vs 92.9%,P=0.42;complete resection rate:71.4%vs 89.3%,P=0.18;and adverse event rate:3.6%vs 17.9%,P=0.19,local recurrence rate:3.6%vs 0%,P=1;metastatic recurrence rate:0%in both).Only one patient in the ESD group underwent emergency surgery owing to intraoperative perforation.CONCLUSION EMR has significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay than ESD,and provides acceptable curability and safety compared to ESD.Accordingly,EMR for SNADETs is associated with lower medical costs.

Colon mucosal neoplasia referred for endoscopic mucosal resection:Recurrence of adenomas and prediction of submucosal invasion

BACKGROUND Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to surgery for large polyps and laterally spreading lesions.Gross morphology and surface characteristics may help predict submucosal invasion of the lesion(SMIL)during endoscopic evaluation.This is one of the largest singlecenter studies reporting endoscopic mucosal resection for larger(≥20 mm)colorectal lesions in the United States.AIM To determine the recurrence rate of adenomas and endoscopic features that may predict submucosal invasion of colonic mucosal neoplasia.METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of all the patients referred for endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions≥20 mm,spanning a period from January 2013 to February 2017.The main outcome measure was identifying features that may predict submucosal invasion of mucosal lesions and predict recurrence of adenomas on follow-up surveillance colonoscopy performed at 4-6 mo.RESULTS A total of 480 patients with 500 lesions were included in the study.The median age was 68(Inter quantile range:14)with 52%males.The most common lesion location was ascending colon(161;32%).Paris classification 0-IIa(Flat elevation of mucosa-316;63.2%);Kudo Pit Pattern IIIs(192;38%)and Granular surface morphology(260;52%)were most prevalent.Submucosal invasion was present in 23(4.6%)out of 500 lesions.The independent risk factors for SMIL were Kudo Pit Pattern IIIL+IV and V(Odds ratio:4.5;P value<0.004)and Paris classification 0-IIc(Odds ratio:18.2;P value<0.01).Out of 500,354 post-endoscopic mucosal resection scars were examined at surveillance colonoscopy.Recurrence was noted in 21.8%(77 cases).CONCLUSION There was overall low prevalence of SMIL in our study.Kudo pit pattern(IIIL+IV and V)and Paris classification 0-IIc were the only factors identified as an independent risk factor for submucosal invasion.The independent risk factor for recurrence was adenoma size(>40 mm).Almost all recurrences(98.8%)were treated endoscopically.

Gastric intramural hematoma accompanied by severe epigastric pain and hematemesis after endoscopic mucosal resection

Gastric intramural hematoma is a rare injury of the stomach,and is most often seen in patients with underlying disease.Such injury following endoscopic therapy is even rarer,and there are no universally accepted guidelines for its treatment.In this case report,we describe a gastric intramural hematoma which occurred within 6 h of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR).Past medical history of this patient was negative,and laboratory examinations revealed normal coagulation profiles and platelet count.Following EMR,the patient experienced severe epigastric pain and vomited 150 mL of gastric contents which were bright red in color.Subsequent emergency endoscopy showed a 4 cm × 5 cm diverticulum-like defect in the anterior gastric antrum wall and a 4 cm × 8 cm intramural hematoma adjacent to the endoscopic submucosal dissection lesion.Following unsatisfactory temporary conservative management,the patient was treated surgically and made a complete recovery.Retrospectively,one possible reason for the patient's condition is that the arterioles in the submucosa or muscularis may have been damaged during deep and massive submucosal injection.Thus,endoscopists should be aware of this potential complication and improve the level of surgery,especially the skills required for submucosal injection.

Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection

A review of the development of the key performance metrics of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),learning from the experience of the establishment of widespread colonoscopy quality measurements.Potential future performance markers for both colonoscopy and EMR are also evaluated to ensure continued high quality performance is maintained with a focus service framework and predictors of patient outcome.