Neuroendocrine prostate cancer(NEPC)shows an aggressive behavior compared to prostate cancer(PCa),also known as prostate adenocarcinoma.Scanty foci in PCa can harbor genetic alternation that can arise in a heterogenei...Neuroendocrine prostate cancer(NEPC)shows an aggressive behavior compared to prostate cancer(PCa),also known as prostate adenocarcinoma.Scanty foci in PCa can harbor genetic alternation that can arise in a heterogeneity of prostate cancer.NEPC may arise de novo or develop following androgen deprivation therapy(ADT).NEPC that arise following ADT has the nomenclature“treatmentemerging/induced NEPC(t-NEPC)”.t-NEPC would be anticipated in castration resistant prostate cancer(CRPC)and metastatic PCa.t-NEPC is characterized by low or absent androgen receptor(AR)expression,independence of AR signaling,and gain of neuroendocrine phenotype.t-NEPC is an aggressive metastatic tumor,develops from PCa in response to drug induced ADT,and shows very short response to conventional therapy.t-NEPC occurs in 10%-17%of patients with CRPC.De novo NEPC is rare and is accounting for less than 2%of all PCa.The molecular mechanisms underlying the trans-differentiation from CRPC to t-NEPC are not fully elucidated.Sphingosine kinase 1 plays a significant role in t-NEPC development.Although neuroendocrine markers:Synaptophysin,chromogranin A,and insulinoma associated protein 1(INSM1)are expressed in t-NEPC,they are non-specific for diagnosis,prognosis,and follow-up of therapy.t-NEPC shows enriched genomic alteration in tumor protein P53(TP53)and retinoblastoma 1(RB1).There are evidences suggest that t-NEPC might develop through epigenetic evolution.There are genomic,epigenetic,and transcriptional alterations that are reported to be involved in development of t-NEPC.Knock-outs of TP53 and RB1 were found to contribute in development of t-NEPC.PCa is resistant to immunotherapy,and at present there are running trials to approach immunotherapy for PCa,CRPC,and t-NEPC.展开更多
Brassica napus(cv.Madrigal)seedlings pre-treated with ascospores of Leptosphaeria biglobosa or foliar sprays of either acibenzolar-S-methyl(ASM)or menadione sodium bisulphite(MSB)were chal- lenge inoculated with L.mac...Brassica napus(cv.Madrigal)seedlings pre-treated with ascospores of Leptosphaeria biglobosa or foliar sprays of either acibenzolar-S-methyl(ASM)or menadione sodium bisulphite(MSB)were chal- lenge inoculated with L.maculans ascospores and assessed for phoma leaf spot development and tissue morphology and gene expression responses to infection.Rates of increase in phoma leaf spot area 8―21 d after challenge inoculation were significantly greater on water pre-treated plants than on plants pre-treated with L.biglobosa,ASM or MSB on both pre-treated leaves(local effect)and younger leaves without pre-treatment(systemic effect).Ninety-six h after challenge inoculation,the invasive hyphae of L.maculans were encircled by rings of necrotic mesophyll cells on leaves pre-treated with L. biglobosa,ASM or MSB but not those pre-treated with water.Quantification of transcript levels of genes commonly used as markers of the major defence signalling pathways(PDF1.2,PR-1,NPR1,APX, CHB4)0–96 h after L.maculans challenge inoculation showed expression patterns indicating prefer- ential activation of the jasmonate/ethylene pathway and involved induction of NPR1 locally and sys- temically in leaves of plants pre-treated with L.biglobosa ascospores.展开更多
目的探讨药物性肝损伤(DILI)患者临床转归的影响因素,构建列线图模型并进行内部验证。方法回顾性分析哈尔滨工业大学附属黑龙江省医院2017年1月—2022年12月收治的188例DILI患者的一般资料和实验室数据,根据患者临床转归分为结局良好组(...目的探讨药物性肝损伤(DILI)患者临床转归的影响因素,构建列线图模型并进行内部验证。方法回顾性分析哈尔滨工业大学附属黑龙江省医院2017年1月—2022年12月收治的188例DILI患者的一般资料和实验室数据,根据患者临床转归分为结局良好组(n=146)和不良结局组(n=42)。正态分布计量资料两组间比较采用成组t检验;非正态分布计量资料两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。计数资料两组间比较采用χ^(2)检验。通过单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析筛选DILI患者临床转归相关的独立影响因素。R Studio 4.1.2软件构建列线图模型,通过校准曲线、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型进行内部验证。结果单因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,肝活检诊断DILI、PLT、ChE、Alb、PTA、IgM和IgG与DILI患者不良结局相关(P值均<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,肝活检诊断DILI(OR=0.072,95%CI:0.022~0.213,P<0.001)、临床分型(OR=0.463,95%CI:0.213~0.926,P=0.039)、ALT(OR=0.999,95%CI:0.998~1.000,P=0.025)、PTA(OR=0.973,95%CI:0.952~0.993,P=0.011)和Ig M(OR=1.456,95%CI:1.082~2.021,P=0.015)是DILI患者临床转归的独立影响因素。构建列线图,经验证校准曲线接近参考曲线,ROC曲线下面积为0.829,决策曲线分析显示该模型具有良好的临床净收益。结论构建的列线图模型对评估DILI患者的临床转归具有较好的临床校准度、鉴别能力和应用价值。展开更多
文摘Neuroendocrine prostate cancer(NEPC)shows an aggressive behavior compared to prostate cancer(PCa),also known as prostate adenocarcinoma.Scanty foci in PCa can harbor genetic alternation that can arise in a heterogeneity of prostate cancer.NEPC may arise de novo or develop following androgen deprivation therapy(ADT).NEPC that arise following ADT has the nomenclature“treatmentemerging/induced NEPC(t-NEPC)”.t-NEPC would be anticipated in castration resistant prostate cancer(CRPC)and metastatic PCa.t-NEPC is characterized by low or absent androgen receptor(AR)expression,independence of AR signaling,and gain of neuroendocrine phenotype.t-NEPC is an aggressive metastatic tumor,develops from PCa in response to drug induced ADT,and shows very short response to conventional therapy.t-NEPC occurs in 10%-17%of patients with CRPC.De novo NEPC is rare and is accounting for less than 2%of all PCa.The molecular mechanisms underlying the trans-differentiation from CRPC to t-NEPC are not fully elucidated.Sphingosine kinase 1 plays a significant role in t-NEPC development.Although neuroendocrine markers:Synaptophysin,chromogranin A,and insulinoma associated protein 1(INSM1)are expressed in t-NEPC,they are non-specific for diagnosis,prognosis,and follow-up of therapy.t-NEPC shows enriched genomic alteration in tumor protein P53(TP53)and retinoblastoma 1(RB1).There are evidences suggest that t-NEPC might develop through epigenetic evolution.There are genomic,epigenetic,and transcriptional alterations that are reported to be involved in development of t-NEPC.Knock-outs of TP53 and RB1 were found to contribute in development of t-NEPC.PCa is resistant to immunotherapy,and at present there are running trials to approach immunotherapy for PCa,CRPC,and t-NEPC.
基金Supported by a Rothamsted International Fellowship to LIU ShengYi,a Royal Society China Fellowship to LIU RenHu,the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council(BBSRC),Department for Environment,Food and Rural Affairs(Defra),the Chadacre Trust,UK and the Ministry of Agriculture,P.R.China
文摘Brassica napus(cv.Madrigal)seedlings pre-treated with ascospores of Leptosphaeria biglobosa or foliar sprays of either acibenzolar-S-methyl(ASM)or menadione sodium bisulphite(MSB)were chal- lenge inoculated with L.maculans ascospores and assessed for phoma leaf spot development and tissue morphology and gene expression responses to infection.Rates of increase in phoma leaf spot area 8―21 d after challenge inoculation were significantly greater on water pre-treated plants than on plants pre-treated with L.biglobosa,ASM or MSB on both pre-treated leaves(local effect)and younger leaves without pre-treatment(systemic effect).Ninety-six h after challenge inoculation,the invasive hyphae of L.maculans were encircled by rings of necrotic mesophyll cells on leaves pre-treated with L. biglobosa,ASM or MSB but not those pre-treated with water.Quantification of transcript levels of genes commonly used as markers of the major defence signalling pathways(PDF1.2,PR-1,NPR1,APX, CHB4)0–96 h after L.maculans challenge inoculation showed expression patterns indicating prefer- ential activation of the jasmonate/ethylene pathway and involved induction of NPR1 locally and sys- temically in leaves of plants pre-treated with L.biglobosa ascospores.
文摘目的探讨药物性肝损伤(DILI)患者临床转归的影响因素,构建列线图模型并进行内部验证。方法回顾性分析哈尔滨工业大学附属黑龙江省医院2017年1月—2022年12月收治的188例DILI患者的一般资料和实验室数据,根据患者临床转归分为结局良好组(n=146)和不良结局组(n=42)。正态分布计量资料两组间比较采用成组t检验;非正态分布计量资料两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。计数资料两组间比较采用χ^(2)检验。通过单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析筛选DILI患者临床转归相关的独立影响因素。R Studio 4.1.2软件构建列线图模型,通过校准曲线、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型进行内部验证。结果单因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,肝活检诊断DILI、PLT、ChE、Alb、PTA、IgM和IgG与DILI患者不良结局相关(P值均<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,肝活检诊断DILI(OR=0.072,95%CI:0.022~0.213,P<0.001)、临床分型(OR=0.463,95%CI:0.213~0.926,P=0.039)、ALT(OR=0.999,95%CI:0.998~1.000,P=0.025)、PTA(OR=0.973,95%CI:0.952~0.993,P=0.011)和Ig M(OR=1.456,95%CI:1.082~2.021,P=0.015)是DILI患者临床转归的独立影响因素。构建列线图,经验证校准曲线接近参考曲线,ROC曲线下面积为0.829,决策曲线分析显示该模型具有良好的临床净收益。结论构建的列线图模型对评估DILI患者的临床转归具有较好的临床校准度、鉴别能力和应用价值。