The model test result of earth force in the side of anti-slide pile of anchor bars was introduced.There are three groups of the tests.The loads were on the back side of the slope in two groups.The other one was loaded...The model test result of earth force in the side of anti-slide pile of anchor bars was introduced.There are three groups of the tests.The loads were on the back side of the slope in two groups.The other one was loaded just behind the pile by the jack.In order to get the force of the soil,some earth-pressure boxes were used to get the earth pressure on the side of the piles.The part of the max pressure and the earth pressure was mainly focused under the slip line展开更多
Large-scale shaking table tests were conducted to study the dynamic response of a slope reinforced by double-row anti-sliding piles and prestressed anchor cables. The test results show that the reinforcement suppresse...Large-scale shaking table tests were conducted to study the dynamic response of a slope reinforced by double-row anti-sliding piles and prestressed anchor cables. The test results show that the reinforcement suppressed the acceleration amplification effectively. The axial force time histories are decomposed into a baseline part and a vibration part in this study. The baseline part of axial force well revealed the seismic slope stability, the peak vibration values of axial force of the anchor cables changed significantly in different area of the slope under seismic excitations. The peak lateral earth pressure acting on the back of the anti-sliding pile located at the slope toe was much larger than that acting on the back of the anti-sliding pile located at the slope waist. The test results indicate an obvious load sharing ratio difference between these two anti-slide piles, the load sharing ratio between the two anti-sliding piles located at the slope toe and the slope waist varied mainly in a range of 2-5. The anti-slide pile at the slope waist suppressed the horizontal displacement of the slope surface.展开更多
云南红河特大桥建水侧采用浅埋重力式锚碇基础,锚碇后趾区和前趾区分别坐落在中风化板岩和强风化板岩上。该工程在前趾区域采用非等长刚性桩复合地基方案解决土岩组合地基、偏心受荷等因素引起的不均匀沉降和水平变位问题。为保证方案...云南红河特大桥建水侧采用浅埋重力式锚碇基础,锚碇后趾区和前趾区分别坐落在中风化板岩和强风化板岩上。该工程在前趾区域采用非等长刚性桩复合地基方案解决土岩组合地基、偏心受荷等因素引起的不均匀沉降和水平变位问题。为保证方案可靠性,项目在中风化和强风化板岩区域分别进行了3组直剪试验、3组载荷试验,针对刚性桩开展了2组单桩载荷试验。试验得到了中风化、强风化板岩的地基承载力分别不小于1200 kPa、800 k Pa,与基础的摩阻系数分别为0.60、0.55;单桩承载力特征值不小于3500 kN。展开更多
文摘The model test result of earth force in the side of anti-slide pile of anchor bars was introduced.There are three groups of the tests.The loads were on the back side of the slope in two groups.The other one was loaded just behind the pile by the jack.In order to get the force of the soil,some earth-pressure boxes were used to get the earth pressure on the side of the piles.The part of the max pressure and the earth pressure was mainly focused under the slip line
基金financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(No.2018YFC1508601)the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University(20822041B4038)
文摘Large-scale shaking table tests were conducted to study the dynamic response of a slope reinforced by double-row anti-sliding piles and prestressed anchor cables. The test results show that the reinforcement suppressed the acceleration amplification effectively. The axial force time histories are decomposed into a baseline part and a vibration part in this study. The baseline part of axial force well revealed the seismic slope stability, the peak vibration values of axial force of the anchor cables changed significantly in different area of the slope under seismic excitations. The peak lateral earth pressure acting on the back of the anti-sliding pile located at the slope toe was much larger than that acting on the back of the anti-sliding pile located at the slope waist. The test results indicate an obvious load sharing ratio difference between these two anti-slide piles, the load sharing ratio between the two anti-sliding piles located at the slope toe and the slope waist varied mainly in a range of 2-5. The anti-slide pile at the slope waist suppressed the horizontal displacement of the slope surface.
文摘云南红河特大桥建水侧采用浅埋重力式锚碇基础,锚碇后趾区和前趾区分别坐落在中风化板岩和强风化板岩上。该工程在前趾区域采用非等长刚性桩复合地基方案解决土岩组合地基、偏心受荷等因素引起的不均匀沉降和水平变位问题。为保证方案可靠性,项目在中风化和强风化板岩区域分别进行了3组直剪试验、3组载荷试验,针对刚性桩开展了2组单桩载荷试验。试验得到了中风化、强风化板岩的地基承载力分别不小于1200 kPa、800 k Pa,与基础的摩阻系数分别为0.60、0.55;单桩承载力特征值不小于3500 kN。
