Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect and mechanism of warming needling technique for the treatment of depression. Methods A total of 60 patients with depression were randomly divided into treatment group and co...Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect and mechanism of warming needling technique for the treatment of depression. Methods A total of 60 patients with depression were randomly divided into treatment group and control group with 30 cases each. The treatment group was treated with warming needle technique on the Jiaji points of the heart, lung, liver, spleen and kidney, control group with Amitriptyline, HAMD scale and the qualitative change of EEG-α wave were observed before and after the treatment. Results The total effective rate of treatment group was 100%, much better than that of the control group with 80% (P<0.05); the HAMD scale of treatment group was better than that of control group (P<0.05); the comparison of the improvement of somatic symptoms between treatment group and control group was significant (P<0.05); the comparison of frequency and amplitude of EEG-α wave was significant (P<0.05), there was no toxic and side effect in the treatment group. Conclusion Warming needling technique for depression has better effect than Amitriptyline, and there was no toxic and side effect in the treatment group. Warming needle technique can effectively regulate the frequency and amplitude EEG-α wave, and acts to improve depressive condition.展开更多
目的通过对女性围绝经健康人群和情绪障碍人群的临床对比研究,以期探索生活事件、人格特征、应付方式等社会心理因素在女性围绝经期情绪障碍中的作用.方法研究对象为在中山大学附属第三医院心理科住院的抑郁为主伴或不伴焦虑的围绝经期...目的通过对女性围绝经健康人群和情绪障碍人群的临床对比研究,以期探索生活事件、人格特征、应付方式等社会心理因素在女性围绝经期情绪障碍中的作用.方法研究对象为在中山大学附属第三医院心理科住院的抑郁为主伴或不伴焦虑的围绝经期女性患者57例,以及来自到广州市海珠区妇幼保健医院参加体检的、经焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)筛选后无抑郁焦虑症状群的健康女性37例,2组年龄均介于40～60岁;主要评定工具为生活事件量表(LES)、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)、应付方式问卷、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、SAS、SDS.结果 1.负性生活事件在女性围绝经期情绪障碍组(58.99±15.32)和健康对照组之间(17.28±8.03)存在着显著差异(P＜0.01);2.神经质(52.22±10.07vs 33.23±4.92)、精神质(57.39±1.26 vs 47.45±14.56)、内外倾性(45.77±12.79 vs 36.33±1.19)在女性围绝经期情绪障碍组和健康对照组之间存在着显著差异(P＜0.001);3.自责的应付方式在女性围绝经期情绪障碍组(0.53±0.28)和健康对照组之间(0.17±0.20)存在着显著差异(P＜0.001);结论生活事件、人格特征、应付方式等社会心理因素影响着女性围绝经期情绪障碍的发生、发展.展开更多
文摘Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect and mechanism of warming needling technique for the treatment of depression. Methods A total of 60 patients with depression were randomly divided into treatment group and control group with 30 cases each. The treatment group was treated with warming needle technique on the Jiaji points of the heart, lung, liver, spleen and kidney, control group with Amitriptyline, HAMD scale and the qualitative change of EEG-α wave were observed before and after the treatment. Results The total effective rate of treatment group was 100%, much better than that of the control group with 80% (P<0.05); the HAMD scale of treatment group was better than that of control group (P<0.05); the comparison of the improvement of somatic symptoms between treatment group and control group was significant (P<0.05); the comparison of frequency and amplitude of EEG-α wave was significant (P<0.05), there was no toxic and side effect in the treatment group. Conclusion Warming needling technique for depression has better effect than Amitriptyline, and there was no toxic and side effect in the treatment group. Warming needle technique can effectively regulate the frequency and amplitude EEG-α wave, and acts to improve depressive condition.
文摘目的通过对女性围绝经健康人群和情绪障碍人群的临床对比研究,以期探索生活事件、人格特征、应付方式等社会心理因素在女性围绝经期情绪障碍中的作用.方法研究对象为在中山大学附属第三医院心理科住院的抑郁为主伴或不伴焦虑的围绝经期女性患者57例,以及来自到广州市海珠区妇幼保健医院参加体检的、经焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)筛选后无抑郁焦虑症状群的健康女性37例,2组年龄均介于40～60岁;主要评定工具为生活事件量表(LES)、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)、应付方式问卷、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、SAS、SDS.结果 1.负性生活事件在女性围绝经期情绪障碍组(58.99±15.32)和健康对照组之间(17.28±8.03)存在着显著差异(P＜0.01);2.神经质(52.22±10.07vs 33.23±4.92)、精神质(57.39±1.26 vs 47.45±14.56)、内外倾性(45.77±12.79 vs 36.33±1.19)在女性围绝经期情绪障碍组和健康对照组之间存在着显著差异(P＜0.001);3.自责的应付方式在女性围绝经期情绪障碍组(0.53±0.28)和健康对照组之间(0.17±0.20)存在着显著差异(P＜0.001);结论生活事件、人格特征、应付方式等社会心理因素影响着女性围绝经期情绪障碍的发生、发展.
