期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
How completely are randomized controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions following concussion reported? A systematic review
1
作者 Jacqueline Josee van Ierssel Olivia Galea +8 位作者 Kirsten Holte Caroline Luszawski Elizabeth Jenkins Jennifer O’Neil Carolyn A Emery Rebekah Mannix Kathryn Schneider Keith Owen Yeates Roger Zemek 《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2024年第4期537-547,共11页
Purpose:The study aimed to examine the reporting completeness of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of non-pharmacological interventions following concussion.Methods:We searched MEDLINE,Embase,PsycInfo,CINAHL,and Web o... Purpose:The study aimed to examine the reporting completeness of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of non-pharmacological interventions following concussion.Methods:We searched MEDLINE,Embase,PsycInfo,CINAHL,and Web of Science up to May 2022.Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed reporting completeness using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication(TIDieR),Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template(CERT),and international Consensus on Therapeutic Exercise aNd Training(i-CONTENT)checklists.Additional information was sought my study authors where reporting was incomplete.Risk of bias(ROB)was assessed with the Cochrane ROB-2 Tool.RCTs examining non-pharmacological interventions following concussion.Results:We included 89 RCTs(n=53 high ROB)examining 11 different interventions for concussion:sub-symptom threshold aerobic exercise,cervicovestibular therapy,physical/cognitive rest,vision therapy,education,psychotherapy,hyperbaric oxygen therapy,transcranial magnetic stimulation,blue light therapy,osteopathic manipulation,and head/neck cooling.Median scores were:TIDieR 9/12(75%;interquartile range(IQR)=5;range:5-12),CERT 17/19(89%;IQR=2;range:10-19),and i-CONTENT 6/7(86%;IQR=1;range:5-7).Percentage of studies completely reporting all items was TIDieR 35%(31/89),CERT 24%(5/21),and i-CONTENT 10%(2/21).Studies were more completely reported after publication of TIDieR(t_(87)=2.08;p=0.04)and CERT(t_(19)=2.72;p=0.01).Reporting completeness was not strongly associated with journal impact factor(TIDieR:rs=0.27;p=0.01;CERT:r_(s)=-0.44;p=0.06;i-CONTENT:r_(s)=-0.17;p=0.48)or ROB(TIDieR:rs=0.11;p=0.31;CERT:rs=0.04;p=0.86;i-CONTENT:rs=0.12;p=0.60).Conclusion:RCTs of non-pharmacological interventions following concussion demonstrate moderate to good reporting completeness,but are often missing key components,particularly modifications,motivational strategies,and qualified supervisor.Reporting completeness improved after TIDieR and CERT publication,but publication in highly cited journals and low ROB do not guarantee reporting completeness. 展开更多
关键词 CONCUSSION INTERVENTION Randomized controlled trial Systematic review
下载PDF
CONSORT-公平性2017扩展版及解释:在随机对照试验中更好地报告健康公平性
2
作者 Vivian A Welch Ole F Norheim +9 位作者 Janet Jull Richard Cookson HaIvor Sommerfelt Peter Tugwell 王小琴(译) 杨楠(译) 周奇(译) 张静怡(译) 陈耀龙(校) 杨克虎(校) 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2018年第12期712-724,共13页
临床试验报告的统一规范(CONSORT)扩展版之CONSORT-公平性(Equity)2017,旨在改善与健康公平性相关的随机对照试验中干预效果的报告质量。健康不公平性是指通过恰当干预可避免的不公平健康差异。健康公平性相关的随机对照试验主要评估对... 临床试验报告的统一规范(CONSORT)扩展版之CONSORT-公平性(Equity)2017,旨在改善与健康公平性相关的随机对照试验中干预效果的报告质量。健康不公平性是指通过恰当干预可避免的不公平健康差异。健康公平性相关的随机对照试验主要评估对健康公平性的影响,包括评价针对社会弱势群体的干预措施,探索2个(或2个以上有梯度特征的)处于不同水平的社会弱势群体间干预效果的差异,或两者皆有。我们与来自高、中、低收入国家的多种类型的相关人员进行了共识会议,其中包括知识用户(如患者)和方法学家等。我们围绕各条目讨论了来自实证研究、系统评价、方法学研究、关键人物访谈以及在线调查的证据,在提高报告清晰度的同时尽量避免给作者增加不必要的负担。CONSORT-公平性2017对CONSORT 2010声明中的16个条目进行了扩展,补充了1个有关伦理报告的条目,同时就每个条目提供了报告质量好的实例和简要的解释。广泛应用CONSORT-公平性2017来报告健康公平性相关试验,可促进决策者发现有关的随机对照试验证据并加以应用,从而减少健康不公平性。 展开更多
关键词 随机对照试验 健康公平性 CONSORT 临床试验报告 报告质量 干预效果 弱势群体 低收入国家
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部