Diagnostic Accuracy of Computerized Bowel Sound Analysis with Non-Invasive Devices for Irritable Bowel Syndrome:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for irritable bowel syndrome(IBS)with a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods We searched MEDLINE,Embase,the Cochrane Library,Web of Science,and IEEE Xplore databases until September 2023.Cross-sectional and case-control studies on diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for IBS were identified.We estimated the pooled sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio,negative likeli-hood ratio,and diagnostic odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval(CI),and plotted a summary receiver operat-ing characteristic curve and evaluated the area under the curve.Results Four studies were included.The pooled diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio,nega-tive likelihood ratio,and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.94(95%CI,0.87‒0.97),0.89(95%CI,0.81‒0.94),8.43(95%CI,4.81‒14.78),0.07(95%CI,0.03‒0.15),and 118.86(95%CI,44.18‒319.75),respectively,with an area under the curve of 0.97(95%CI,0.95‒0.98).Conclusions Computerized bowel sound analysis is a promising tool for IBS.However,limited high-quality data make the results'validity and applicability questionable.There is a need for more diagnostic test accuracy studies and better wearable devices for monitoring and analysis of IBS.

Advancing the precision management of inflammatory bowel disease in the era of omics approaches and new technology

There is great heterogeneity among inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)patients in terms of pathogenesis,clinical manifestation,response to treatment,and prognosis,which requires the individualized and precision management of patients.Many studies have focused on prediction biomarkers and models for assessing IBD disease type,activity,severity,and prognosis.During the era of biologics,how to predict the response and side effects of patients to different treatments and how to quickly recognize the loss of response have also become important topics.Multiomics is a promising area for investigating the complex network of IBD pathogenesis.Integrating numerous amounts of data requires the use of artificial intelligence.

Withered branch-like changes of intrahepatic bile ducts:a rare complication of acute severe biliary pancreatitis

Secondary sclerosing cholangitis(SSC)is a chronic biliary disease characterized by inflammatory responses,fibrous occlusion,strictures,and progressive destruction of intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts,which may lead to cholestasis and cirrhosis(1).Well-described causes of SSC include infectious,ischemic,toxic,immunologic,congenital disorders and so on(2,3).Here,we presented a rare case of sclerosing cholangitis secondary to acute severe biliary pancreatitis.

Indications,strategies,and development on prostate targeted biopsy:Report of the Panjiayuan Consensus Conference 2022

Prostate biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer(PCa).Prostate targeted biopsy(TB)having a higher rate of detecting clinically significant PCa(csPCa)than traditional systematic biopsy(SB)is supported by high-quality evidence.However,the TB indications and strategies are controversial.The National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,invited a panel of recognized urology experts in PCa to address these topics at the Panjiayuan Consensus Conference 2022.The conference results on prostate TB are presented herein.The National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences identified 10 key areas of prostate biopsy:(1)selection of imaging examination;(2)indications of TB;(3)transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy;(4)TB pathways;(5)TB and SB;(6)three techniques of TB;(7)the number of TB cores needed for one lesion;(8)core number for SB;(9)free-hand TB;(10)future development of TB/prostate diagnosis.Thus,a panel of 25 recognized urologists and 2 radiologists from China were invited to attend this conference.The panel voted anonymously on 14 predetermined questions.Voting was based on the panelists'clinical practice and opinion,rather than high-level evidence.The voting outcomes were supported by the panel unequally,and details of the voting results were reported.The voting results can help clinicians to decide on biopsy timing and proper strategies,for which guidelines are sparse.We also focused on the future development of TB and SB,such as the combined pathway of TB and SB,techniques of TB,biopsy cores,free-hand TB,and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography.