Background: As a promising biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-Ⅱ(PIVKA-Ⅱ) has been studied extensively. However, its diagnostic capability varies across HCC...Background: As a promising biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-Ⅱ(PIVKA-Ⅱ) has been studied extensively. However, its diagnostic capability varies across HCC studies. This study aimed to compare the performance of PIVKA-Ⅱ with alpha-fetoprotein(AFP) in the diagnosis of HCC. Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify the studies from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library Databases, which were published up to December 20, 2017 to compare the diagnostic capability of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP for HCC. The data were pooled using random effects model. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) was employed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each marker. Results: Thirty-one studies were included. The pooled sensitivity(95% CI) of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP was 0.66(0.65–0.68) and 0.66(0.65–0.67), respectively in diagnosis of HCC; and the corresponding pooled specificity(95% CI) was 0.89(0.88–0.90) and 0.84(0.83–0.85), respectively. The area under the ROC curve(AUC) of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP was 0.856(0.817–0.895) and 0.770(0.728–0.811), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that PIVKA-Ⅱ was superior to AFP in terms of the AUC for both small HCC( < 3 cm) [0.863(0.825–0.901) vs 0.717(0.658–0.776)] and large HCC( ≥ 3 cm) [0.854(0.811–0.897) vs 0.729(0.682–0.776)]; for American [0.926(0.897–0.955) vs 0.698(0.594–0.662)], European [0.772(0.743–0.801) vs 0.628(0.594–0.662)], Asian [0.838(0.812–0.864) vs 0.785(0.764–0.806)] and African [0.812(0.794–0.840) vs 0.721(0.675–0.767)] HCC patients; and for HBV-related [0.909(0.866–0.951) vs 0.714(0.673–0.755)] and mixed-etiology [0.847(0.821–0.873) vs 0.794(0.772–0.816)] HCC. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that PIVKA-Ⅱ is better than AFP in terms of the accuracy for diagnosing HCC, regardless of tumor size, patient ethnic group, or HCC etiology.展开更多
Background: Iopromide (Ultravist®) has been shown to be a very safe CM agent in previous post-marketing surveillance studies on Western and Asian populations. Our study aimed to analyse data pertaining to the s...Background: Iopromide (Ultravist®) has been shown to be a very safe CM agent in previous post-marketing surveillance studies on Western and Asian populations. Our study aimed to analyse data pertaining to the safety, tolerability and diagnostic image quality of Iopromide in an unselected sub-set of the Chinese population. Methods: we analysed data for Chinese ambulatory and in-patients who received Iopromide for an imaging procedure (in accordance with the local package insert and routine clinical practice), as part of an international post-marketing surveillance study. Use of premedication was at the discretion of the attending physician. Patient demographics, clinical history, type of examination, contrast quality and tolerability, including pre-specified adverse drug reactions, were recorded. All statistical analyses were descriptive. Results: case report forms for 20,000 Chinese patients (61.3% men) were analysed, of whom 153 patients (0.77%) had risk factors for idiosyncratic contrast media reactions (at-risk group). Use of premedication, most commonly corticosteroids, was recorded for 5658 patients (28.3%) and 86 at-risk patients (56.2% of the at-risk group), respectively. The mean (±standard deviation) dose of iodine administered was 29 ± 5.5 g. During the physician’s evaluation of image parameters, contrast quality was considered to be “good” (64.7%) or “excellent” (29.3%) in the majority of patients. 571 patients (2.9%) experienced at least one adverse drug reaction [most frequently nausea (0.70%) and dysgeusia (0.62%)], which were typically transient and of mild intensity. Two serious adverse drug reactions were reported [edema (n = 1), decreased blood pressure and dyspnea (n = 1)]. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was increased in the at-risk group versus the overall patient population, and tended to reduce with premedication (mainly corticosteroids). Conclusions: Iopromide was well tolerated and proved to be an efficient contrast agent in a large, non-selected sub-set of Chinese patients undergoing different types of diagnostic imaging procedures.展开更多
基金supported in part by the National Natural Sci-ence Foundation of China(81472284 and 81672699)Shanghai Pujiang Program(16PJD004)
文摘Background: As a promising biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-Ⅱ(PIVKA-Ⅱ) has been studied extensively. However, its diagnostic capability varies across HCC studies. This study aimed to compare the performance of PIVKA-Ⅱ with alpha-fetoprotein(AFP) in the diagnosis of HCC. Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify the studies from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library Databases, which were published up to December 20, 2017 to compare the diagnostic capability of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP for HCC. The data were pooled using random effects model. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) was employed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each marker. Results: Thirty-one studies were included. The pooled sensitivity(95% CI) of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP was 0.66(0.65–0.68) and 0.66(0.65–0.67), respectively in diagnosis of HCC; and the corresponding pooled specificity(95% CI) was 0.89(0.88–0.90) and 0.84(0.83–0.85), respectively. The area under the ROC curve(AUC) of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP was 0.856(0.817–0.895) and 0.770(0.728–0.811), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that PIVKA-Ⅱ was superior to AFP in terms of the AUC for both small HCC( < 3 cm) [0.863(0.825–0.901) vs 0.717(0.658–0.776)] and large HCC( ≥ 3 cm) [0.854(0.811–0.897) vs 0.729(0.682–0.776)]; for American [0.926(0.897–0.955) vs 0.698(0.594–0.662)], European [0.772(0.743–0.801) vs 0.628(0.594–0.662)], Asian [0.838(0.812–0.864) vs 0.785(0.764–0.806)] and African [0.812(0.794–0.840) vs 0.721(0.675–0.767)] HCC patients; and for HBV-related [0.909(0.866–0.951) vs 0.714(0.673–0.755)] and mixed-etiology [0.847(0.821–0.873) vs 0.794(0.772–0.816)] HCC. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that PIVKA-Ⅱ is better than AFP in terms of the accuracy for diagnosing HCC, regardless of tumor size, patient ethnic group, or HCC etiology.
文摘Background: Iopromide (Ultravist®) has been shown to be a very safe CM agent in previous post-marketing surveillance studies on Western and Asian populations. Our study aimed to analyse data pertaining to the safety, tolerability and diagnostic image quality of Iopromide in an unselected sub-set of the Chinese population. Methods: we analysed data for Chinese ambulatory and in-patients who received Iopromide for an imaging procedure (in accordance with the local package insert and routine clinical practice), as part of an international post-marketing surveillance study. Use of premedication was at the discretion of the attending physician. Patient demographics, clinical history, type of examination, contrast quality and tolerability, including pre-specified adverse drug reactions, were recorded. All statistical analyses were descriptive. Results: case report forms for 20,000 Chinese patients (61.3% men) were analysed, of whom 153 patients (0.77%) had risk factors for idiosyncratic contrast media reactions (at-risk group). Use of premedication, most commonly corticosteroids, was recorded for 5658 patients (28.3%) and 86 at-risk patients (56.2% of the at-risk group), respectively. The mean (±standard deviation) dose of iodine administered was 29 ± 5.5 g. During the physician’s evaluation of image parameters, contrast quality was considered to be “good” (64.7%) or “excellent” (29.3%) in the majority of patients. 571 patients (2.9%) experienced at least one adverse drug reaction [most frequently nausea (0.70%) and dysgeusia (0.62%)], which were typically transient and of mild intensity. Two serious adverse drug reactions were reported [edema (n = 1), decreased blood pressure and dyspnea (n = 1)]. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was increased in the at-risk group versus the overall patient population, and tended to reduce with premedication (mainly corticosteroids). Conclusions: Iopromide was well tolerated and proved to be an efficient contrast agent in a large, non-selected sub-set of Chinese patients undergoing different types of diagnostic imaging procedures.
