本文对28例多发梗塞性痴呆(MID)患者和25例阿尔采默氏痴呆(DAT)患者的脑CT 改变及认知障碍特点进行了对比研究。结果发现,MID 患者脑室周围低密度改变的比率(82%)显著高于 DAT 组患者(36%)。而 DAT 组患者的脑沟较 MID 组的显著增宽。M...本文对28例多发梗塞性痴呆(MID)患者和25例阿尔采默氏痴呆(DAT)患者的脑CT 改变及认知障碍特点进行了对比研究。结果发现,MID 患者脑室周围低密度改变的比率(82%)显著高于 DAT 组患者(36%)。而 DAT 组患者的脑沟较 MID 组的显著增宽。MID 组患者第三脑室扩大与智能损害严重程度呈显著正相关。MID 患者的智能损害不完全,可保留某方面的能力致疾病严重阶段。展开更多
Objective To investigate clinical first selected method on the differential diagnosis at early stage between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis(ALS) and cervical spondylosis.Methods The clinical features and EMG in 53 pati...Objective To investigate clinical first selected method on the differential diagnosis at early stage between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis(ALS) and cervical spondylosis.Methods The clinical features and EMG in 53 patients with ALS,14 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM) and 23 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy(CSR) were analysed.And then the value of ratio of every probability was calculated.According to the value of ratio, the clinical features and EMG were compared in differential dia gnosis.Results A multiprogram that consisted of high multiple clinical features was used in differential diagnosis, true positive rate is 98%, and true negative rate is 86.5%,EMG still couldn’t be used in the differential diagnosis.Conclusion The program is the first selected method, which can be used in the differential diagnosis between ALS and CSM/CSR.展开更多
文摘Objective To investigate clinical first selected method on the differential diagnosis at early stage between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis(ALS) and cervical spondylosis.Methods The clinical features and EMG in 53 patients with ALS,14 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM) and 23 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy(CSR) were analysed.And then the value of ratio of every probability was calculated.According to the value of ratio, the clinical features and EMG were compared in differential dia gnosis.Results A multiprogram that consisted of high multiple clinical features was used in differential diagnosis, true positive rate is 98%, and true negative rate is 86.5%,EMG still couldn’t be used in the differential diagnosis.Conclusion The program is the first selected method, which can be used in the differential diagnosis between ALS and CSM/CSR.
