Two 2D layer complexes {[La（TBTA）1.5（phen）2H2O].3H2O}n （1） and {[Ce（TBTA）l.5（phen）2H2O]-3H2O}n （2） （H2TBTA = 2,3,5,6-tetrabromoterephthalic acid, phen = 1.10-phenanthroline） have been synthesized and cha...Two 2D layer complexes {[La（TBTA）1.5（phen）2H2O].3H2O}n （1） and {[Ce（TBTA）l.5（phen）2H2O]-3H2O}n （2） （H2TBTA = 2,3,5,6-tetrabromoterephthalic acid, phen = 1.10-phenanthroline） have been synthesized and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analyses, IR spectra and thermogravimetric analyses. Both crystals belong to monoclinic, space group P21/n. Crystal data for 1： a = 8.7097（11）, b = 34.276（4）, c = 13.7281（17） A, β = 95.397（2）°, V= 4080.1（9） A3, Z = 4, LaC36H24Br6N4O10, Mr= 1290.96, Dc = 2.102 g/cm3,μ（MoKa） = 6.983 mm-1, F（000） = 2460.0, T = 296（2） K, the final R （I 〉 2σ（I）） = 0.0478 and wR （all data） = 0.0985 for 10127 independent （Rint = 0.0775） and 7137 observed reflections with I 〉 2σ（I）. Crystal data for 2： a = 8.709（2）, b = 34.202（9）, c = 13.685（4） A, β = 95.714（4）, V= 4055.9（19） A3, Z = 4, CeBr6C36H24O10N4, Mr = 1292.17, Dc = 2.116 g/cm3, μ（MoKa） = 7.094 mm-1, F（000） = 2464.0, T= 296（2） K, the final R（I 〉 2σ（I）） = 0.0590 and wR（all data） = 0.1453 for 10014 independent （Rint = 0.1253） and 6081 observed reflections with I 〉 2σ（I）. Both complexes are allomerism with the general molecular formula of {[M（TBTA）1.5（phen）2H2O].3H2O}n. In the structures, the H2TBTA ligands adopt a monodentate coordination mode. Both the 2D layer frameworks are further extended to be 3D layers via H-bonding interactions.展开更多
基金Supported by the International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Projects of Shanxi Province (2011081022)International S&T Cooperation Program of China (No. 2011DFA51980)the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 2009021024)
文摘Two 2D layer complexes {[La（TBTA）1.5（phen）2H2O].3H2O}n （1） and {[Ce（TBTA）l.5（phen）2H2O]-3H2O}n （2） （H2TBTA = 2,3,5,6-tetrabromoterephthalic acid, phen = 1.10-phenanthroline） have been synthesized and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analyses, IR spectra and thermogravimetric analyses. Both crystals belong to monoclinic, space group P21/n. Crystal data for 1： a = 8.7097（11）, b = 34.276（4）, c = 13.7281（17） A, β = 95.397（2）°, V= 4080.1（9） A3, Z = 4, LaC36H24Br6N4O10, Mr= 1290.96, Dc = 2.102 g/cm3,μ（MoKa） = 6.983 mm-1, F（000） = 2460.0, T = 296（2） K, the final R （I 〉 2σ（I）） = 0.0478 and wR （all data） = 0.0985 for 10127 independent （Rint = 0.0775） and 7137 observed reflections with I 〉 2σ（I）. Crystal data for 2： a = 8.709（2）, b = 34.202（9）, c = 13.685（4） A, β = 95.714（4）, V= 4055.9（19） A3, Z = 4, CeBr6C36H24O10N4, Mr = 1292.17, Dc = 2.116 g/cm3, μ（MoKa） = 7.094 mm-1, F（000） = 2464.0, T= 296（2） K, the final R（I 〉 2σ（I）） = 0.0590 and wR（all data） = 0.1453 for 10014 independent （Rint = 0.1253） and 6081 observed reflections with I 〉 2σ（I）. Both complexes are allomerism with the general molecular formula of {[M（TBTA）1.5（phen）2H2O].3H2O}n. In the structures, the H2TBTA ligands adopt a monodentate coordination mode. Both the 2D layer frameworks are further extended to be 3D layers via H-bonding interactions.
