以企业稀土专利视角出发,建立一个较为合理的企业层面专利质量评价,构造技术质量、经济质量和法律质量三个维度建立对企业稀土专利评价指标体系。基于熵权TOPSIS主客观赋权构建评价模型,对中国企业稀土专利质量进行实证评价,结果表明:...以企业稀土专利视角出发,建立一个较为合理的企业层面专利质量评价,构造技术质量、经济质量和法律质量三个维度建立对企业稀土专利评价指标体系。基于熵权TOPSIS主客观赋权构建评价模型,对中国企业稀土专利质量进行实证评价,结果表明:一些企业专利数量排名与专利质量排名不相符,出现较大差异;石油化工企业整体表现出色,多个企业位居前列,相比之下,制造业和稀土新材料行业的企业则表现相对较弱。许多此类企业的排名较为靠后,这可能反映了这些行业在技术升级、产业链整合以及国际市场竞争中的挑战;专利质量中经济层面指标占比最高,建议企业应加快专利经济转化。From the perspective of enterprise rare earth patents, a relatively reasonable patent quality evaluation system at the enterprise level is established, constructing an evaluation index system for enterprise rare earth patents across three dimensions: technical quality, economic quality, and legal quality. Based on the entropy weight TOPSIS method, which combines subjective and objective weighting, an evaluation model is built to empirically assess the patent quality of Chinese enterprises in the rare earth industry. The results indicate that there is a significant discrepancy between the rankings of patent quantity and patent quality for some enterprises. Petrochemical enterprises generally perform well, with several ranking at the top, while enterprises in the manufacturing and rare earth new materials industries show relatively weaker performance. Many such enterprises rank lower, which may reflect the challenges these industries face in technological upgrading, industry chain integration, and international market competition. The economic dimension of patent quality has the highest weight, suggesting that enterprises should accelerate the economic conversion of patents.展开更多
文摘以企业稀土专利视角出发,建立一个较为合理的企业层面专利质量评价,构造技术质量、经济质量和法律质量三个维度建立对企业稀土专利评价指标体系。基于熵权TOPSIS主客观赋权构建评价模型,对中国企业稀土专利质量进行实证评价,结果表明:一些企业专利数量排名与专利质量排名不相符,出现较大差异;石油化工企业整体表现出色,多个企业位居前列,相比之下,制造业和稀土新材料行业的企业则表现相对较弱。许多此类企业的排名较为靠后,这可能反映了这些行业在技术升级、产业链整合以及国际市场竞争中的挑战;专利质量中经济层面指标占比最高,建议企业应加快专利经济转化。From the perspective of enterprise rare earth patents, a relatively reasonable patent quality evaluation system at the enterprise level is established, constructing an evaluation index system for enterprise rare earth patents across three dimensions: technical quality, economic quality, and legal quality. Based on the entropy weight TOPSIS method, which combines subjective and objective weighting, an evaluation model is built to empirically assess the patent quality of Chinese enterprises in the rare earth industry. The results indicate that there is a significant discrepancy between the rankings of patent quantity and patent quality for some enterprises. Petrochemical enterprises generally perform well, with several ranking at the top, while enterprises in the manufacturing and rare earth new materials industries show relatively weaker performance. Many such enterprises rank lower, which may reflect the challenges these industries face in technological upgrading, industry chain integration, and international market competition. The economic dimension of patent quality has the highest weight, suggesting that enterprises should accelerate the economic conversion of patents.
