为了解“强师计划”背景下在校师范生综合素质发展情况,采用《师范生综合素质水平调查问卷》对543位师范生展开问卷调查。结果发现,师范生的综合素质较高,其中以教师职业道德理念与心理素质得分最高;师范生综合素质总得分的性别差异显著...为了解“强师计划”背景下在校师范生综合素质发展情况,采用《师范生综合素质水平调查问卷》对543位师范生展开问卷调查。结果发现,师范生的综合素质较高,其中以教师职业道德理念与心理素质得分最高;师范生综合素质总得分的性别差异显著,部分维度的年级和生源地差异显著;师范生综合素质高得分在性别、年级方面有显著差异,但生源地差异不显著。对以上结果进行了讨论和分析,并提出了提高在校师范生综合素质的建议。In order to understand the development of comprehensive quality of normal university students under the background of “Strong Teacher Plan”, a questionnaire survey was conducted using the “Normal University Students’ Comprehensive Quality Level Questionnaire” among 543 normal university students. The results show that the comprehensive quality of normal university students is higher, among which the professional ethics and psychological quality of teachers score the highest. The total score of comprehensive quality of normal university students has significant differences in gender and some dimensions of grade and place of origin. There are significant differences in the high scores of comprehensive quality among normal university students in terms of gender and grade, but there is no significant differences in the place of origin. The above results are discussed and analyzed, and some suggestions are put forward to improve the comprehensive quality of normal university students.展开更多
文摘为了解“强师计划”背景下在校师范生综合素质发展情况,采用《师范生综合素质水平调查问卷》对543位师范生展开问卷调查。结果发现,师范生的综合素质较高,其中以教师职业道德理念与心理素质得分最高;师范生综合素质总得分的性别差异显著,部分维度的年级和生源地差异显著;师范生综合素质高得分在性别、年级方面有显著差异,但生源地差异不显著。对以上结果进行了讨论和分析,并提出了提高在校师范生综合素质的建议。In order to understand the development of comprehensive quality of normal university students under the background of “Strong Teacher Plan”, a questionnaire survey was conducted using the “Normal University Students’ Comprehensive Quality Level Questionnaire” among 543 normal university students. The results show that the comprehensive quality of normal university students is higher, among which the professional ethics and psychological quality of teachers score the highest. The total score of comprehensive quality of normal university students has significant differences in gender and some dimensions of grade and place of origin. There are significant differences in the high scores of comprehensive quality among normal university students in terms of gender and grade, but there is no significant differences in the place of origin. The above results are discussed and analyzed, and some suggestions are put forward to improve the comprehensive quality of normal university students.