在全球化时代蓬勃发展的趋势下,和平发展、合作共赢的时代潮流不可阻挡。本研究从现实情境出发,采用2 (不对称社会困境:相对优势、相对劣势) × 2 (社会善念感知水平:高水平、低水平)的混合实验设计。实验结果显示:1) 不对称社会困...在全球化时代蓬勃发展的趋势下,和平发展、合作共赢的时代潮流不可阻挡。本研究从现实情境出发,采用2 (不对称社会困境:相对优势、相对劣势) × 2 (社会善念感知水平:高水平、低水平)的混合实验设计。实验结果显示:1) 不对称社会困境的主效应显著(F = 25.107, p F = 60.524, p F = 30.916, p p Under the trend of vigorous development of the era of globalization, the trend of the times of peaceful development and win-win cooperation is unstoppable. Based on the real-world situation, this study adopted a mixed experimental design of 2 (asymmetric social dilemmas: relative advantages and disadvantages) × 2 (social kindness perception level: high and low level). The experimental results showed that: 1) the main effect of asymmetric social dilemma was significant (F = 25.107, p F = 60.524, p F = 30.916, p p < 0.05, 95% CI = [0.005, 0.081]). This conclusion shows the synergistic influence of environmental factors and personal characteristics in individual decision-making, and provides important guiding significance for management practice.展开更多
文摘在全球化时代蓬勃发展的趋势下,和平发展、合作共赢的时代潮流不可阻挡。本研究从现实情境出发,采用2 (不对称社会困境:相对优势、相对劣势) × 2 (社会善念感知水平:高水平、低水平)的混合实验设计。实验结果显示:1) 不对称社会困境的主效应显著(F = 25.107, p F = 60.524, p F = 30.916, p p Under the trend of vigorous development of the era of globalization, the trend of the times of peaceful development and win-win cooperation is unstoppable. Based on the real-world situation, this study adopted a mixed experimental design of 2 (asymmetric social dilemmas: relative advantages and disadvantages) × 2 (social kindness perception level: high and low level). The experimental results showed that: 1) the main effect of asymmetric social dilemma was significant (F = 25.107, p F = 60.524, p F = 30.916, p p < 0.05, 95% CI = [0.005, 0.081]). This conclusion shows the synergistic influence of environmental factors and personal characteristics in individual decision-making, and provides important guiding significance for management practice.
