44 cats were used in this experiment. The spinal cords of 40 animals were injuredat about L<sub>1</sub> level by using Allen’s method （400g/cm） and randomly divided into 2 groups: A)electro-acupuncture ...44 cats were used in this experiment. The spinal cords of 40 animals were injuredat about L<sub>1</sub> level by using Allen’s method （400g/cm） and randomly divided into 2 groups: A)electro-acupuncture treatment group （n=20） and B) control group（n=20）. 2 weeks after spinalcord injury, 80% of animals in the treatment group were survival and 45% of animals in the con-trol group were survival. There was significant difference between these two groups （p【0. 05）.The motor evoked potential was recorded two weeks after spinal cord injury. The latency of theshort latency peak was 15. 61±4. 98 mS and the amplitude was 10. 61 0. 59 mV in the treatmentgroup; and 21. 7±5. 02 mS and 0. 56±0. 32 mV in the control group. Both latency and amplitudewere significant different between the two groups （P【0. 05, P【0. 05）. The Anti-NF-H （neuro-filament） was determined at 2 and 4 weeks respectively after spinal cord injury. The more NF-Hpositive labeling fibers were found in the treatment group than in the control group （P【0. 01 ）.展开更多
文摘44 cats were used in this experiment. The spinal cords of 40 animals were injuredat about L<sub>1</sub> level by using Allen’s method （400g/cm） and randomly divided into 2 groups: A)electro-acupuncture treatment group （n=20） and B) control group（n=20）. 2 weeks after spinalcord injury, 80% of animals in the treatment group were survival and 45% of animals in the con-trol group were survival. There was significant difference between these two groups （p【0. 05）.The motor evoked potential was recorded two weeks after spinal cord injury. The latency of theshort latency peak was 15. 61±4. 98 mS and the amplitude was 10. 61 0. 59 mV in the treatmentgroup; and 21. 7±5. 02 mS and 0. 56±0. 32 mV in the control group. Both latency and amplitudewere significant different between the two groups （P【0. 05, P【0. 05）. The Anti-NF-H （neuro-filament） was determined at 2 and 4 weeks respectively after spinal cord injury. The more NF-Hpositive labeling fibers were found in the treatment group than in the control group （P【0. 01 ）.
