本文原以英文撰写,为那原道(Randall L.Nadeau)编《约翰威立中国宗教指南(The WileyBlackwell Companion to Chinese Religions)》(Malden,MA:Wiley-Blackwell,2012)中的一章。该文旨在一般性介绍中国民间宗教及其在中国历史、文化和社...本文原以英文撰写,为那原道(Randall L.Nadeau)编《约翰威立中国宗教指南(The WileyBlackwell Companion to Chinese Religions)》(Malden,MA:Wiley-Blackwell,2012)中的一章。该文旨在一般性介绍中国民间宗教及其在中国历史、文化和社会中扮演的角色。本文考察"民间宗教"的定义,介绍与之相关的宇宙观及"神学",同时考察相关的宗教术士及传承方式。文章的第二部分通过考察中国民间宗教与家庭、社区和国家的关系,以及通过论述其内部自发性宗教社团的性质和功能来描述中国民间宗教的社会关联性。展开更多
This paper focuses on Eduard Erkes(1891-1958)as one representative of the so-called"Leipzig School,"who made major contributions to the study of Chinese religions.His studies of the"shamanic substrates&...This paper focuses on Eduard Erkes(1891-1958)as one representative of the so-called"Leipzig School,"who made major contributions to the study of Chinese religions.His studies of the"shamanic substrates"revealed in the Songs of the South(Chuci楚辞),practice-derived insights into Daoist inner alchemy(neidan内丹),and his translation of the Heshanggong河上公commentary to the Daodejing道德经anticipate later developments in scholarship,but are at the same time closely related to contemporary scholarly concerns of the Leipzig School(such as an emphasis on the supposed autochthony of Chinese culture and on evolutionary models of cultural development)as well as to personal(mystical)and political(socialist)interests of Erkes himself.The paper also discusses Erkes’relationship with other German and German-language scholarship of the time,such as the works of Wilhelm Grube,Erwin Rousselle,Richard Wilhelm,Heinrich Hackmann,Alfred Forke,and J.J.M.de Groot.展开更多
文摘本文原以英文撰写,为那原道(Randall L.Nadeau)编《约翰威立中国宗教指南(The WileyBlackwell Companion to Chinese Religions)》(Malden,MA:Wiley-Blackwell,2012)中的一章。该文旨在一般性介绍中国民间宗教及其在中国历史、文化和社会中扮演的角色。本文考察"民间宗教"的定义,介绍与之相关的宇宙观及"神学",同时考察相关的宗教术士及传承方式。文章的第二部分通过考察中国民间宗教与家庭、社区和国家的关系,以及通过论述其内部自发性宗教社团的性质和功能来描述中国民间宗教的社会关联性。
文摘This paper focuses on Eduard Erkes(1891-1958)as one representative of the so-called"Leipzig School,"who made major contributions to the study of Chinese religions.His studies of the"shamanic substrates"revealed in the Songs of the South(Chuci楚辞),practice-derived insights into Daoist inner alchemy(neidan内丹),and his translation of the Heshanggong河上公commentary to the Daodejing道德经anticipate later developments in scholarship,but are at the same time closely related to contemporary scholarly concerns of the Leipzig School(such as an emphasis on the supposed autochthony of Chinese culture and on evolutionary models of cultural development)as well as to personal(mystical)and political(socialist)interests of Erkes himself.The paper also discusses Erkes’relationship with other German and German-language scholarship of the time,such as the works of Wilhelm Grube,Erwin Rousselle,Richard Wilhelm,Heinrich Hackmann,Alfred Forke,and J.J.M.de Groot.
