objective To study the clonal evolution of domestic children with lymphoid malignancies inorder to choose the optimal method for the detection of the minimal residual disease. methods To use the PCRwhich employs 22pri...objective To study the clonal evolution of domestic children with lymphoid malignancies inorder to choose the optimal method for the detection of the minimal residual disease. methods To use the PCRwhich employs 22primers and SSCP, investigating the matched samples obtained at diagnosis and at relapse of 13children with lymphoid malignancies. Results The clonal evolution occurred in 54%, 23%, 38%, 46%, 54%, 62%and 54% of 13 cases by PCR employing IgH, TCRγ, TCRVδ2, - Dδ3, TCRPVJ1, TCRPVJ2, TCRPD1,J2, TCRβD2J2primers respectively. NO change occurred only in one of those cases. Clonal evolution at relapse occurred at 50% ofsamples which had only one band PCR product at diagnosis and 78% of those had multiple bands PCR product atdiagnosis. No differences had been detected between diagnosis and relapse by SSCP analyzing those samples inwhich no band change occurred between that at diagnosis and at relapse in PAGE. Conclusion It should beoptimal that the one band rearranged gene at diagnosis acts as main monitoring marker, simultaneously referringto the main band in multiple bands rearranged gene in order to avoid false negative.展开更多
文摘objective To study the clonal evolution of domestic children with lymphoid malignancies inorder to choose the optimal method for the detection of the minimal residual disease. methods To use the PCRwhich employs 22primers and SSCP, investigating the matched samples obtained at diagnosis and at relapse of 13children with lymphoid malignancies. Results The clonal evolution occurred in 54%, 23%, 38%, 46%, 54%, 62%and 54% of 13 cases by PCR employing IgH, TCRγ, TCRVδ2, - Dδ3, TCRPVJ1, TCRPVJ2, TCRPD1,J2, TCRβD2J2primers respectively. NO change occurred only in one of those cases. Clonal evolution at relapse occurred at 50% ofsamples which had only one band PCR product at diagnosis and 78% of those had multiple bands PCR product atdiagnosis. No differences had been detected between diagnosis and relapse by SSCP analyzing those samples inwhich no band change occurred between that at diagnosis and at relapse in PAGE. Conclusion It should beoptimal that the one band rearranged gene at diagnosis acts as main monitoring marker, simultaneously referringto the main band in multiple bands rearranged gene in order to avoid false negative.