期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
总胆红素联合GRACE评分对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内不良心血管事件的预测价值 被引量:13
1
作者 胡云科 周鹏 《成都医学院学报》 CAS 2021年第4期441-446,共6页
目的探讨总胆红素(TB)联合全球急性冠状动脉事件注册风险(GRACE)评分对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,院内发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测价值。方法选取2017年7月至2020年1月于成都医学院... 目的探讨总胆红素(TB)联合全球急性冠状动脉事件注册风险(GRACE)评分对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,院内发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测价值。方法选取2017年7月至2020年1月于成都医学院第一附属医院心内科确诊为STEMI并行急诊PCI的患者230例为研究对象,根据患者院内是否发生MACE分为MACE组(n=35)和非MACE组(n=195),对两组基线资料、生化指标、介入及超声资料进行比较。运用二分类Logistic回归确立TB+GRACE评分的联合方程,并绘制ROC曲线。多因素二分类Logistic回归分析得到STEMI患者发生院内MACE的独立危险因素。结果MACE组的年龄、白细胞(WBC)、中性粒细胞、TB、直接胆红素(DB)、GRACE评分值均高于非MACE组(P<0.05)。TB+GRACE评分的联合方程(AUC=0.728,P<0.001)、TB(AUC=0.621,P=0.023)、GRACE评分(AUC=0.703,P<0.001)对院内MACE有一定预测能力,TB+GRACE评分的联合方程AUC在数值上较单一指标大。多因素二分类Logistic分析显示,WBC、DB、TB+GRACE联合方程与STEMI患者院内MACE独立相关(P<0.05)。结论与单一的TB、GRACE评分相比,TB+GRACE联合方程评分在一定程度上更适合预测STEMI患者院内MACE。WBC、DB水平及TB+GRACE的联合方程是STEMI患者发生院内MACE的独立危险因素。 展开更多
关键词 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死 全球急性冠状动脉事件注册风险评分 主要不良心血管事件 总胆红素
下载PDF
Efficacy and safety of renal denervation for resistant hypertension:A systematic review and meta-analysis
2
作者 ZHAO Dan WANG Xiao-qing +3 位作者 LIU Min HU Yun-ke WANG Pei-jian ZHOU Peng 《South China Journal of Cardiology》 CAS 2020年第3期204-215,共12页
Background Renal denervation has a tortuous history.Significant reductions in blood pressure following denervation of the renal artery were observed in early trials,but subsequent denervation under sham surgery was fo... Background Renal denervation has a tortuous history.Significant reductions in blood pressure following denervation of the renal artery were observed in early trials,but subsequent denervation under sham surgery was found to be neutral.Methods This study was performed according to search results by CNKI,WANFANG DATA,EMBASE database,Pubmed,Medline,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,Clinicaltrials.gov,and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to June 20,2019.For continuous outcomes,heterogeneity were assessed by Cochran’s Q test and random-effect models weighted for the inverse of the variance.Dichotomous data were analyzed using relative risk(RR)with 95%CIs.Safety was assessed by assessing the risk of major adverse events from stratified contingency tables.Results 10 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1323 individuals were included in the quantitative analysis.Pooled analyses indicated that renal denervation was associated with a significantly greater reduction of office systolic blood pressure[mean difference(MD):-5.61 mm Hg,95%CI:-9.03 to-2.19,Z=3.21,P=0.0001]and 24-hour systolic blood pressure(MD:-4.40 mmHg,95%CI:-14.03 to-3.83,Z=5.09,P<0.00001)than controls.Renal denervation was not associated with an increased risk of major adverse events(RR:1.12,95%CI:0.72 to 1.64,Z=0.66,P=0.51),and estimated glomerular filtration rate(e GFR)[MD:0.35 mL/(min·1.73 m2),95%CI:-2.05 to2.74,Z=0.28,P=0.78]from baseline to 6 months is statistically insignificant with significant heterogeneity.Conclusions In selected resistant hypertension patients maintained on antihypertensive drugs,renal denervation with the SYMPLICITY systems did significantly decrease blood pressure.Renal denervation was not associated with an increased risk of major adverse events. 展开更多
关键词 randomized clinical trial renal denervation resistant hypertension systematic review META-ANALYSIS
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部