本文以最高人民法院公报发布的典型裁判案例为例,讨论标准必要专利全球授权条件的管辖范围,分析我国法院对这类案件有无管辖权,以及如何落实生效裁判等拓展话题。最高人民法院经过二审审理对OPPO公司向夏普株式会社提起的标准必要专利...本文以最高人民法院公报发布的典型裁判案例为例,讨论标准必要专利全球授权条件的管辖范围,分析我国法院对这类案件有无管辖权,以及如何落实生效裁判等拓展话题。最高人民法院经过二审审理对OPPO公司向夏普株式会社提起的标准必要专利许可争议诉讼作出终审裁定,判决我国法院有权管辖标准必要专利全球许可条件的争议。经过此次案件,中国法院也明确了我国在裁判标准必要专利全球许可纠纷时拥有管辖权。最高人民法院就管辖权问题做出慎重裁判,同时,也促使OPPO公司与夏普株式会社双方达成公平有效的合作协议。Taking the typical decision cases published in the bulletin of the Supreme People’s Court as an example, this article discusses the jurisdiction of the global licensing conditions for standard essential patents and analyzes whether courts in China have jurisdiction over such cases and how to implement the effective decisions and other expansion topics. The Supreme People’s Court issued a final ruling after the second instance trial on the dispute litigation of standard essential patent licensing filed by OPPO against Sharp Corporation, and ruled that the courts in China have jurisdiction over the dispute over the global licensing conditions of standard essential patents. As a result of this case, the courts in China have also clarified that China has jurisdiction in adjudicating disputes over the global licensing of standard-essential patents. The Supreme People’s Court made a careful decision on the issue of jurisdiction, and at the same time, prompted both OPPO and Sharp to reach a fair and effective co-operation agreement.展开更多
文摘本文以最高人民法院公报发布的典型裁判案例为例,讨论标准必要专利全球授权条件的管辖范围,分析我国法院对这类案件有无管辖权,以及如何落实生效裁判等拓展话题。最高人民法院经过二审审理对OPPO公司向夏普株式会社提起的标准必要专利许可争议诉讼作出终审裁定,判决我国法院有权管辖标准必要专利全球许可条件的争议。经过此次案件,中国法院也明确了我国在裁判标准必要专利全球许可纠纷时拥有管辖权。最高人民法院就管辖权问题做出慎重裁判,同时,也促使OPPO公司与夏普株式会社双方达成公平有效的合作协议。Taking the typical decision cases published in the bulletin of the Supreme People’s Court as an example, this article discusses the jurisdiction of the global licensing conditions for standard essential patents and analyzes whether courts in China have jurisdiction over such cases and how to implement the effective decisions and other expansion topics. The Supreme People’s Court issued a final ruling after the second instance trial on the dispute litigation of standard essential patent licensing filed by OPPO against Sharp Corporation, and ruled that the courts in China have jurisdiction over the dispute over the global licensing conditions of standard essential patents. As a result of this case, the courts in China have also clarified that China has jurisdiction in adjudicating disputes over the global licensing of standard-essential patents. The Supreme People’s Court made a careful decision on the issue of jurisdiction, and at the same time, prompted both OPPO and Sharp to reach a fair and effective co-operation agreement.
