目的探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)联合透明质酸(HA)关节内注射与PRP单独注射相比的疗效和安全性,为膝骨性关节炎(KOA)的治疗提供循证策略。方法查阅PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库,检索建库初到2021年10月公开发表的文...目的探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)联合透明质酸(HA)关节内注射与PRP单独注射相比的疗效和安全性,为膝骨性关节炎(KOA)的治疗提供循证策略。方法查阅PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库,检索建库初到2021年10月公开发表的文献。纳入已发表的随机对照实验(RCT)或队列研究。研究对象为KOA患者,实验组为PRP联合HA关节内注射,对照组为PRP或HA关节内注射。对纳入RCT研究使用Cochrane手册风险评估工具进行质量评价,队列研究使用Newcastle-Ottawa Scale进行质量评价,用RevMan5.3软件对结局指标进行Meta分析。结果纳入10篇文献,共1110例患者,其中PRP组467例,PRP+HA组450例,HA组193例。Meta分析结果显示,PRP+HA组在治疗6个月后视觉模拟评分(VAS,MD:-0.31;95%CI(-0.60~-0.03);P=0.03)、西大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分(MD:-2.81;95%CI(-4.48~-1.13);P=0.001)、Lequesne指数(MD:-1.46;95%CI(-2.01~-0.90);P<0.00001)均显著优于PRP组;两组并发症发生率无统计学意义(RD:0.00;95%CI(-0.03~0.04);P=0.97)。结论PRP联合HA治疗KOA具有良好的临床治疗效果。基于此Meta分析,与单纯关节内注射PRP相比,PRP联合HA可提高治疗6个月后的WOMAC评分、VAS评分和Lequesne指数评分。在并发症发生率方面,两种治疗方案的安全性相似。展开更多
In order to develop a basic electrode with low fume and good usability, a new slag system has been designed after analyzing several basic electrode slag systems. Then in view of uniform design method, arranging the ex...In order to develop a basic electrode with low fume and good usability, a new slag system has been designed after analyzing several basic electrode slag systems. Then in view of uniform design method, arranging the experiment points by it, the influenced laws of the new system coating components on the arc stability had been searched. In the formula, nine coating components were taken as independent variables and they were divided into six levels in all twenty-four experiments. The arc stability was taken as function and taken down the data when welding and then put them into the computer to be processed statistically. The analysis results give the mathematical model and trend diagrams between independent variables and the function. They indicate that the effects of many coating components on the arc stability are in the mutual form. The mutual effects between CaCO3 and BaF2, BaF2 and BaCO3, increases the arc stability separately. While the mutual effects between CaF2 and iron powder, the square item of iron powder itself decreases the arc stability separately.展开更多
文摘目的探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)联合透明质酸(HA)关节内注射与PRP单独注射相比的疗效和安全性,为膝骨性关节炎(KOA)的治疗提供循证策略。方法查阅PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库,检索建库初到2021年10月公开发表的文献。纳入已发表的随机对照实验(RCT)或队列研究。研究对象为KOA患者,实验组为PRP联合HA关节内注射,对照组为PRP或HA关节内注射。对纳入RCT研究使用Cochrane手册风险评估工具进行质量评价,队列研究使用Newcastle-Ottawa Scale进行质量评价,用RevMan5.3软件对结局指标进行Meta分析。结果纳入10篇文献,共1110例患者,其中PRP组467例,PRP+HA组450例,HA组193例。Meta分析结果显示,PRP+HA组在治疗6个月后视觉模拟评分(VAS,MD:-0.31;95%CI(-0.60~-0.03);P=0.03)、西大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分(MD:-2.81;95%CI(-4.48~-1.13);P=0.001)、Lequesne指数(MD:-1.46;95%CI(-2.01~-0.90);P<0.00001)均显著优于PRP组;两组并发症发生率无统计学意义(RD:0.00;95%CI(-0.03~0.04);P=0.97)。结论PRP联合HA治疗KOA具有良好的临床治疗效果。基于此Meta分析,与单纯关节内注射PRP相比,PRP联合HA可提高治疗6个月后的WOMAC评分、VAS评分和Lequesne指数评分。在并发症发生率方面,两种治疗方案的安全性相似。
基金Supported by Research Project of Heilongjiang Education Science and Technology (11521051)
文摘In order to develop a basic electrode with low fume and good usability, a new slag system has been designed after analyzing several basic electrode slag systems. Then in view of uniform design method, arranging the experiment points by it, the influenced laws of the new system coating components on the arc stability had been searched. In the formula, nine coating components were taken as independent variables and they were divided into six levels in all twenty-four experiments. The arc stability was taken as function and taken down the data when welding and then put them into the computer to be processed statistically. The analysis results give the mathematical model and trend diagrams between independent variables and the function. They indicate that the effects of many coating components on the arc stability are in the mutual form. The mutual effects between CaCO3 and BaF2, BaF2 and BaCO3, increases the arc stability separately. While the mutual effects between CaF2 and iron powder, the square item of iron powder itself decreases the arc stability separately.
