Objective:To summarize practical experiences of clinical application of artificial heart and discuss its indications and prevention of complications. Methods: Before operation, all the four patients underwent regular ...Objective:To summarize practical experiences of clinical application of artificial heart and discuss its indications and prevention of complications. Methods: Before operation, all the four patients underwent regular treatment of internal medicine, and after its failure they were implanted with artificial hearts. Operations were performed under general anesthesia and external circulation at low temperature. Left ventricle assistant devices (LVAD) were used for three patients, and double ventricle assistant device (DVAP) for one. Two patients were embeded with Berlin artificial hearts (Melipot company). The other two were implanted with Medos artificial hearts ( Medos company). Results:All the patients had no infection and haemorrhage, while their cardiac functions were restored apparently. Three to five days after operation, patients could take off- bed activities. Two had been taken away their artificial hearts on 52th and 53th postoperative day, and arrhythmia disappeared. Half year follow- up revealed favorable results. One died,on 271st day,of bleeding from congenital cerebrovascular deformity. One died, on 10th postoperative day, of renal dysfunction and DIC. Conclusion: Artificial heart or Ventricle assistant devices (VAD) could be used as temporary substitute for heart transplantation, and used in emergent heart attacks in order to restore cardiac function.展开更多
目的探讨快速康复外科(fast—track surgery,FTS)在非小细胞肺癌(nonsmall—cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者围术期中的应用。方法2007年9月至2010年5月对40例NSCLC患者围术期采用FTS模式(PTS组);同期40例按传统手术外科(conserv...目的探讨快速康复外科(fast—track surgery,FTS)在非小细胞肺癌(nonsmall—cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者围术期中的应用。方法2007年9月至2010年5月对40例NSCLC患者围术期采用FTS模式(PTS组);同期40例按传统手术外科(conservative treatment surgery,CTS)围术期处理的同种手术患者(CTS组)作对照。比较两组患者术后肺部并发症(肺部感染、肺不张、持续漏气大于7d)的发生率;同时分析两组的心血管事件、外科技术并发症、术后辅助通气时间、手术结束时体温、ICU停留时间(length of stay,LOS)及住院天数等。结果两组患者的年龄、性别、术前肺功能(forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1 )以及美国麻醉学会( American Society of Anethesiologists, ASA)评分等差异无统计学意义。FTS组术后早期肺功能(FEV1)恢复较CTS组快(P〈0.05),术后肺部并发症的发生率显著减少(34.21%比8.33%,P〈0.05)。两组LOS的中位数相差1d;FTS组住院天数明显低于CTS组,差异有统计学意义[(11.1±3.6)d比(16.6±5.7)d,P〈0.05]。结论FTS模式对NSCLC患者进行围术期处置,可减少术后肺部并发症等的发生率,促进患者早期康复。展开更多
文摘Objective:To summarize practical experiences of clinical application of artificial heart and discuss its indications and prevention of complications. Methods: Before operation, all the four patients underwent regular treatment of internal medicine, and after its failure they were implanted with artificial hearts. Operations were performed under general anesthesia and external circulation at low temperature. Left ventricle assistant devices (LVAD) were used for three patients, and double ventricle assistant device (DVAP) for one. Two patients were embeded with Berlin artificial hearts (Melipot company). The other two were implanted with Medos artificial hearts ( Medos company). Results:All the patients had no infection and haemorrhage, while their cardiac functions were restored apparently. Three to five days after operation, patients could take off- bed activities. Two had been taken away their artificial hearts on 52th and 53th postoperative day, and arrhythmia disappeared. Half year follow- up revealed favorable results. One died,on 271st day,of bleeding from congenital cerebrovascular deformity. One died, on 10th postoperative day, of renal dysfunction and DIC. Conclusion: Artificial heart or Ventricle assistant devices (VAD) could be used as temporary substitute for heart transplantation, and used in emergent heart attacks in order to restore cardiac function.
文摘目的探讨快速康复外科(fast—track surgery,FTS)在非小细胞肺癌(nonsmall—cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者围术期中的应用。方法2007年9月至2010年5月对40例NSCLC患者围术期采用FTS模式(PTS组);同期40例按传统手术外科(conservative treatment surgery,CTS)围术期处理的同种手术患者(CTS组)作对照。比较两组患者术后肺部并发症(肺部感染、肺不张、持续漏气大于7d)的发生率;同时分析两组的心血管事件、外科技术并发症、术后辅助通气时间、手术结束时体温、ICU停留时间(length of stay,LOS)及住院天数等。结果两组患者的年龄、性别、术前肺功能(forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1 )以及美国麻醉学会( American Society of Anethesiologists, ASA)评分等差异无统计学意义。FTS组术后早期肺功能(FEV1)恢复较CTS组快(P〈0.05),术后肺部并发症的发生率显著减少(34.21%比8.33%,P〈0.05)。两组LOS的中位数相差1d;FTS组住院天数明显低于CTS组,差异有统计学意义[(11.1±3.6)d比(16.6±5.7)d,P〈0.05]。结论FTS模式对NSCLC患者进行围术期处置,可减少术后肺部并发症等的发生率,促进患者早期康复。