Background: The efficacy of octreotide to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) of pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative use of octreotid...Background: The efficacy of octreotide to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) of pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative use of octreotide on the outcomes after PD.Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial for postoperative use of octreotide in patients undergoing PD. Patients with soft pancreas and pancreatic duct < 3 mm were randomized to 2 groups.Group I did not receive postoperative octreotide. Group II received postoperative octreotide. The primary end of the study is to compare the rate of POPF.Results: A total of 104 patients were included in the study and were divided into two randomized groups.There were no significant difference in overall complications and its severity. POPF occurred in 11 patients(21.2%) in group I and 10(19.2%) in group II, without statistical significance(P = 0.807). Also, there was no significant differences between both groups regarding the incidence of biliary leakage(P = 0.083), delayed gastric emptying(P = 0.472), and early postoperative mortality(P = 0.727).Conclusions: Octreotide did not reduce postoperative morbidities, reoperation and mortality rate. Also, it did not affect the incidence of POPF and its clinically relevant variants.展开更多
文摘Background: The efficacy of octreotide to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) of pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative use of octreotide on the outcomes after PD.Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial for postoperative use of octreotide in patients undergoing PD. Patients with soft pancreas and pancreatic duct < 3 mm were randomized to 2 groups.Group I did not receive postoperative octreotide. Group II received postoperative octreotide. The primary end of the study is to compare the rate of POPF.Results: A total of 104 patients were included in the study and were divided into two randomized groups.There were no significant difference in overall complications and its severity. POPF occurred in 11 patients(21.2%) in group I and 10(19.2%) in group II, without statistical significance(P = 0.807). Also, there was no significant differences between both groups regarding the incidence of biliary leakage(P = 0.083), delayed gastric emptying(P = 0.472), and early postoperative mortality(P = 0.727).Conclusions: Octreotide did not reduce postoperative morbidities, reoperation and mortality rate. Also, it did not affect the incidence of POPF and its clinically relevant variants.
