BACKGROUND Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detection of colonic disease.An optimal evaluation depends on adequate bowel cleansing.Patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD),require frequent endoscopic ass...BACKGROUND Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detection of colonic disease.An optimal evaluation depends on adequate bowel cleansing.Patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD),require frequent endoscopic assessment for both activity and dysplasia assessment.Two commonly used bowel preparations in Australia are Prep Kit-C(Pc)and Moviprep(Mp).Little is known about tolerability,efficacy and safety of split protocols of Mp and Pc in both IBD and non-IBD patients.AIM To primary aim was to compare the tolerability,efficacy and safety of split protocols of Mp and Pc in patients having a colonoscopy.The secondary aim was to compare the efficacy,tolerability and safety of either preparation in patients with or without IBD.METHODS Patients were randomized to Pc or Mp bowel preparation.Patients completed a questionnaire to assess tolerability.Efficacy was assessed using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Score.Serum electrolytes and renal function were collected one week prior to colonoscopy and on the day of colonoscopy.RESULTS Of 338 patients met the inclusion criteria.Of 168 patients randomized to Mp and 170 to Pc.The efficacy of bowel preparation(mean Ottawa Bowel Preparation Score)was similar between Mp(5.4±2.4)and Pc(5.1±2.1)(P=0.3).Mean tolerability scores were similar in Mp(11.84±5.4)and Pc(10.99±5.2;P=0.17).125 patients had IBD(73 had Crohn’s Disease and 52 had Ulcerative colitis).Sixtyfour IBD patients were allocated to Mp and 61 to Pc.In non-IBD patients,104 were allocated to Mp and 109 to Pc.The mean tolerability score in the IBD group was lower than the non-IBD group(mean tolerability scores:IBD:10.3±5.1 and non-IBD:12.0±5.3;P=0.01).IBD patients described more abdominal pain with Mp when compared with Pc;(Mp:5.7±4.4 vs Pc:3.6±2.6,P=0.046).Serum magnesium level increased with Pc compared with Mp in all patients(mean increase in mmol/L:Mp:0.03±0.117 and Pc:0.11±0.106;P<0.0001).CONCLUSION In this study,the efficacy,tolerability and safety of Mp and Pc were similar in all patients.However,patients with IBD reported lower tolerability with both preparations.Specifically,IBD patients had more abdominal pain with Mp.These results should be considered when recommending bowel preparation especially to IBD patients.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detection of colonic disease.An optimal evaluation depends on adequate bowel cleansing.Patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD),require frequent endoscopic assessment for both activity and dysplasia assessment.Two commonly used bowel preparations in Australia are Prep Kit-C(Pc)and Moviprep(Mp).Little is known about tolerability,efficacy and safety of split protocols of Mp and Pc in both IBD and non-IBD patients.AIM To primary aim was to compare the tolerability,efficacy and safety of split protocols of Mp and Pc in patients having a colonoscopy.The secondary aim was to compare the efficacy,tolerability and safety of either preparation in patients with or without IBD.METHODS Patients were randomized to Pc or Mp bowel preparation.Patients completed a questionnaire to assess tolerability.Efficacy was assessed using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Score.Serum electrolytes and renal function were collected one week prior to colonoscopy and on the day of colonoscopy.RESULTS Of 338 patients met the inclusion criteria.Of 168 patients randomized to Mp and 170 to Pc.The efficacy of bowel preparation(mean Ottawa Bowel Preparation Score)was similar between Mp(5.4±2.4)and Pc(5.1±2.1)(P=0.3).Mean tolerability scores were similar in Mp(11.84±5.4)and Pc(10.99±5.2;P=0.17).125 patients had IBD(73 had Crohn’s Disease and 52 had Ulcerative colitis).Sixtyfour IBD patients were allocated to Mp and 61 to Pc.In non-IBD patients,104 were allocated to Mp and 109 to Pc.The mean tolerability score in the IBD group was lower than the non-IBD group(mean tolerability scores:IBD:10.3±5.1 and non-IBD:12.0±5.3;P=0.01).IBD patients described more abdominal pain with Mp when compared with Pc;(Mp:5.7±4.4 vs Pc:3.6±2.6,P=0.046).Serum magnesium level increased with Pc compared with Mp in all patients(mean increase in mmol/L:Mp:0.03±0.117 and Pc:0.11±0.106;P<0.0001).CONCLUSION In this study,the efficacy,tolerability and safety of Mp and Pc were similar in all patients.However,patients with IBD reported lower tolerability with both preparations.Specifically,IBD patients had more abdominal pain with Mp.These results should be considered when recommending bowel preparation especially to IBD patients.
