期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
躯干运动和负重时对足底支撑面侧向横移的姿势控制 被引量:6
1
作者 黄强民 Panl Hodges alf thorstensson 《中国运动医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第2期152-157,199,共7页
目的 :本研究假设自主运动命令和姿势控制信号间有冲突 ,因此设计在附加重物和不同自主任务的同时给予足底一个模拟受滑的干扰 (横移 )来观察姿势变化并分析其是否受冲突命令或者力学参数的影响。方法 :受试者在执行各种不同的自主任务... 目的 :本研究假设自主运动命令和姿势控制信号间有冲突 ,因此设计在附加重物和不同自主任务的同时给予足底一个模拟受滑的干扰 (横移 )来观察姿势变化并分析其是否受冲突命令或者力学参数的影响。方法 :受试者在执行各种不同的自主任务时 ,随机给予足底支撑面一个左侧或右侧的横移干扰。这些不同的自主任务包括不负重静止站立、静止站立单手负重 5kg、负重 5kg站立并躯干静止侧屈 15°、负重 5kg动态地提重物和放重物 5项任务。测量和分析下列参数 :中心压力的侧位移(COP)、躯干和股部在冠状面上的角位移和腹内压 (IAP)。结果 :干扰离开质量 (向右 )、始反应超射的幅度、达到终平衡的时间和达到平衡前COP位移的次数都增加 ,这种情况可以看作是为了再获得平衡的姿势反应效率降低 ,因此 ,如果质量的重力效果能对抗干扰 ,则再获得平衡的反应效率甚至可以被增进。结论 :提重和负重是危害姿势反应效率的因素 ,因为提重和负重改变了重力效果 ,加大了对躯干的干扰。在动态条件下躯干的运动不是被横移干扰增强就是被横移干扰抵消 ,并没有显著地影响改变最终平衡位置姿势校正的效应。因此附加任务的同时给一个支持面上的横移干扰 ,姿势控制的效应可以被抵消。 展开更多
关键词 躯干运动 负重状态 足底支撑面 侧向横移 姿势控制 力学特性
下载PDF
Trunk Kinematics and Centre of Pressure Displacement during Lateral Lifting and Lowering
2
作者 Huang Qiangmin alf thorstensson Andrew Cresswell 《中国运动医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期428-434,共7页
Lateral bending of the trunk has been specifically identified as a high risk factor for lower back disorders. However, few studies have presented in vivo kinematic data of the trunk while performing functional lateral... Lateral bending of the trunk has been specifically identified as a high risk factor for lower back disorders. However, few studies have presented in vivo kinematic data of the trunk while performing functional lateral bending tasks. Five healthy male subjects performed lateral lifting and lowering tasks under loading condition ranging from light (2kg) to 100 % of a maximum (ML) at a controlled velocity. Single lowering tasks were also performed at 125% and 150% of ML. Video based movement analysis was used to determine kinematics of the trunk, pelvis, shoulders and neck in the frontal plane. Centre of pressure (COP) data was also obtained from a force platform on which the subjects stood when performing the lifting and lowering tasks. Kinematics of the trunk revealed a smooth and relatively large change in angular displacement (between 69°to 55°) toward the unloaded side during the lifting phase. Trunk angular displacement significantly decreased with increasing lifting load. The trunk was additionally divided into four segments representing the lower and upper lumbar regions and the lower and upper thoracic regions. The greatest displacement in these segments took place at the upper lumbar and lower thoracic regions (ranging from 29°to 22°and 23°to 17°, respectively) with the least displacement occurring in the lower lumbar and upper thoracic regions (approx. 6° and 5°, respectively). Both the upper lumbar and lower thoracic segments showed significant decreases in angular displacement with increasing load. During the single lowering trials the trunk rotated toward the loaded side with slightly less magnitude to that recorded during the lowering phase of the heaviest lifting and lowering conditions. Angular displacements of the upper lumbar and lower thoracic segments also decreased with increasing load in single lowering. Identified changes in the COP displacement were also correlated to increasing lifting and lowering load. The main findings of this study indicate that it is the central sections of the trunk that have the greatest motion 展开更多
关键词 运动分析 运动医学 侧弯曲 侧提升
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部