Background: In order to end tuberculosis(TB),it is necessary to expand coverage of TB care services,including systematic screening initiatives.However,more evidence is needed for groups among whom systematic screening...Background: In order to end tuberculosis(TB),it is necessary to expand coverage of TB care services,including systematic screening initiatives.However,more evidence is needed for groups among whom systematic screening is only conditionally recommended by the World Health Organization.This study evaluated concurrent screening in multiple target groups using community health workers(CHW).Methods:: In our two-year intervention study lasting from October 2017 to September 2019,CHWs in six districts of Ho Chi Minh City,Viet Nam verbally screened three urban priority groups:(1)household TB contacts;(2)close TB contacts;and(3)residents of urban priority areas without clear documented exposure to TB including hotspots,boarding homes and urban slums.Eligible persons were referred for further screening with chest radiography and follow-on testing with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay.Symptomatic individuals with normal or without radiography results were tested on smear microscopy.We described the TB care cascade and characteristics for each priority group,and calculated yield and number needed to screen.Subsequently,we fitted a mixed-effect logistic regression to identify the association of these target groups and secondary patient covariates with TB treatment initiation.Results: We verbally screened 321020 people including 24232 household contacts,3182 social and close contacts and 293606 residents of urban priority areas.This resulted in 1138 persons treated for TB,of whom 85 were household contacts,39 were close contacts and 1014 belonged to urban priority area residents.The yield of active TB in these groups was 351,1226 and 345 per 100000,respectively,corresponding to numbers needed to screen of 285,82 and 290.The fitted model showed that close contacts[adjusted odds ratio(aOR)=2.07;95%CI:1.38–3.11;P<0.001]and urban priority area residents(aOR=2.18;95%CI:1.69–2.79;P<0.001)had a greater risk of active TB than household contacts.Conclusions: The study detected a large number of unreached persons with TB,but most of them were not among persons in contact with an index patient.Therefore,while programs should continue to optimize screening in contacts,to close the detection gap in high TB burden settings such as Viet Nam,coverage must be expanded to persons without documented exposure such as residents in hotspots,boarding homes and urban slums.展开更多
基金The IMPACT-TB study and LNQV,AJC,RJF,NTN,TNV,GTL,JL,SBS,KL and MC were supported by the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement number 733174.We received additional support from the Stop TB Partnership’s TB REACH initiative with funding from the Government of Canada.These funding bodies had no role in the design of the study,in collection,analysis,and interpretation of data,or in writing the manuscript.
文摘Background: In order to end tuberculosis(TB),it is necessary to expand coverage of TB care services,including systematic screening initiatives.However,more evidence is needed for groups among whom systematic screening is only conditionally recommended by the World Health Organization.This study evaluated concurrent screening in multiple target groups using community health workers(CHW).Methods:: In our two-year intervention study lasting from October 2017 to September 2019,CHWs in six districts of Ho Chi Minh City,Viet Nam verbally screened three urban priority groups:(1)household TB contacts;(2)close TB contacts;and(3)residents of urban priority areas without clear documented exposure to TB including hotspots,boarding homes and urban slums.Eligible persons were referred for further screening with chest radiography and follow-on testing with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay.Symptomatic individuals with normal or without radiography results were tested on smear microscopy.We described the TB care cascade and characteristics for each priority group,and calculated yield and number needed to screen.Subsequently,we fitted a mixed-effect logistic regression to identify the association of these target groups and secondary patient covariates with TB treatment initiation.Results: We verbally screened 321020 people including 24232 household contacts,3182 social and close contacts and 293606 residents of urban priority areas.This resulted in 1138 persons treated for TB,of whom 85 were household contacts,39 were close contacts and 1014 belonged to urban priority area residents.The yield of active TB in these groups was 351,1226 and 345 per 100000,respectively,corresponding to numbers needed to screen of 285,82 and 290.The fitted model showed that close contacts[adjusted odds ratio(aOR)=2.07;95%CI:1.38–3.11;P<0.001]and urban priority area residents(aOR=2.18;95%CI:1.69–2.79;P<0.001)had a greater risk of active TB than household contacts.Conclusions: The study detected a large number of unreached persons with TB,but most of them were not among persons in contact with an index patient.Therefore,while programs should continue to optimize screening in contacts,to close the detection gap in high TB burden settings such as Viet Nam,coverage must be expanded to persons without documented exposure such as residents in hotspots,boarding homes and urban slums.
