AIM:To compare outcomes of conventional and Hangback methods of inferior oblique(IO)recession in V-pattern strabismus with inferior oblique overaction(IOOA).METHODS:Comparative randomized study was conducted consistin...AIM:To compare outcomes of conventional and Hangback methods of inferior oblique(IO)recession in V-pattern strabismus with inferior oblique overaction(IOOA).METHODS:Comparative randomized study was conducted consisting of 50 patients,age 6 to 35 y having V-pattern strabismus[>15 prism diopter(PD)]with IOOA.They were divided equally in two groups and underwent IO recession,group A by conventional method and group B by Hang-back method.Parameters evaluated were reduction in V-pattern and IOOA,shift in torsion,improvement in binocular status.Success was a residual V-pattern of less than 10 PD at 1 y of follow up.RESULTS:The mean V-pattern preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 y was 24±5.4 PD and 4.2±3.51 PD in group A and 23.44±6.44 PD and 5.76±3.8 PD in group B respectively.The mean reduction in V-pattern was 20±6.78 PD in group A and 18.2±5.48 PD in group B.The mean correction of IOOA was 18.48±3.13 PD in group A and 16±2.93 PD in group B.Mean shift in extorsion was 3.08±1.8 degree in group A and 3.72±2.14 degree in group B.CONCLUSION:Both the procedures achieve a significant and comparable reduction in V-pattern and IOOA.Hang-back recession being a landmark free surgery eliminates the need for intrascleral suturing thereby reducing the risk of scleral perforation with possible postoperative adjustment of muscle.It may be considered as a good alternative for IO recession in patients of V-pattern strabismus with mild to moderate amount of IOOA.展开更多
文摘AIM:To compare outcomes of conventional and Hangback methods of inferior oblique(IO)recession in V-pattern strabismus with inferior oblique overaction(IOOA).METHODS:Comparative randomized study was conducted consisting of 50 patients,age 6 to 35 y having V-pattern strabismus[>15 prism diopter(PD)]with IOOA.They were divided equally in two groups and underwent IO recession,group A by conventional method and group B by Hang-back method.Parameters evaluated were reduction in V-pattern and IOOA,shift in torsion,improvement in binocular status.Success was a residual V-pattern of less than 10 PD at 1 y of follow up.RESULTS:The mean V-pattern preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 y was 24±5.4 PD and 4.2±3.51 PD in group A and 23.44±6.44 PD and 5.76±3.8 PD in group B respectively.The mean reduction in V-pattern was 20±6.78 PD in group A and 18.2±5.48 PD in group B.The mean correction of IOOA was 18.48±3.13 PD in group A and 16±2.93 PD in group B.Mean shift in extorsion was 3.08±1.8 degree in group A and 3.72±2.14 degree in group B.CONCLUSION:Both the procedures achieve a significant and comparable reduction in V-pattern and IOOA.Hang-back recession being a landmark free surgery eliminates the need for intrascleral suturing thereby reducing the risk of scleral perforation with possible postoperative adjustment of muscle.It may be considered as a good alternative for IO recession in patients of V-pattern strabismus with mild to moderate amount of IOOA.
