AIM To investigate the role of tacrolimus intra-patient variability(IPV) in adult liver-transplant recipients.METHODS We retrospectively assessed tacrolimus variability in a cohort of liver-transplant recipients and a...AIM To investigate the role of tacrolimus intra-patient variability(IPV) in adult liver-transplant recipients.METHODS We retrospectively assessed tacrolimus variability in a cohort of liver-transplant recipients and analyzed its effect on the occurrence of graft rejection and de novo donor-specific antibodies(dn DSAs), as well as graft survival during the first 2 years posttransplantation. Between 02/08 and 06/2015, 116 patients that received tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil(with or without steroids) were included. RESULTS Twenty-two patients(18.5%) experienced at least one acute-rejection episode(BPAR). Predictive factors for a BPAR were a tacrolimus IPV of > 35% [OR = 3.07 95%CI(1.14-8.24), P = 0.03] or > 40% [OR = 4.16(1.38-12.50), P = 0.01), and a tacrolimus trough level of < 5 ng/mL [OR=3.68(1.3-10.4), P =0.014]. Thirteen patients(11.2%) developed at least one dn DSA during the follow-up. Tacrolimus IPV [coded as a continuous variable: OR = 1.1, 95%CI(1.0-1.12), P = 0.006] of > 35% [OR = 4.83, 95%CI(1.39-16.72), P = 0.01] and > 40% [OR = 9.73, 95%CI(2.65-35.76), P = 0.001] were identified as predictors to detect dn DSAs. IPV did not impact on patient-or graft-survival rates during the follow-up. CONCLUSION Tacrolimus-IPV could be a useful tool to identify patients with a greater risk of graft rejection and of developing a de novo DSA after liver展开更多
文摘AIM To investigate the role of tacrolimus intra-patient variability(IPV) in adult liver-transplant recipients.METHODS We retrospectively assessed tacrolimus variability in a cohort of liver-transplant recipients and analyzed its effect on the occurrence of graft rejection and de novo donor-specific antibodies(dn DSAs), as well as graft survival during the first 2 years posttransplantation. Between 02/08 and 06/2015, 116 patients that received tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil(with or without steroids) were included. RESULTS Twenty-two patients(18.5%) experienced at least one acute-rejection episode(BPAR). Predictive factors for a BPAR were a tacrolimus IPV of > 35% [OR = 3.07 95%CI(1.14-8.24), P = 0.03] or > 40% [OR = 4.16(1.38-12.50), P = 0.01), and a tacrolimus trough level of < 5 ng/mL [OR=3.68(1.3-10.4), P =0.014]. Thirteen patients(11.2%) developed at least one dn DSA during the follow-up. Tacrolimus IPV [coded as a continuous variable: OR = 1.1, 95%CI(1.0-1.12), P = 0.006] of > 35% [OR = 4.83, 95%CI(1.39-16.72), P = 0.01] and > 40% [OR = 9.73, 95%CI(2.65-35.76), P = 0.001] were identified as predictors to detect dn DSAs. IPV did not impact on patient-or graft-survival rates during the follow-up. CONCLUSION Tacrolimus-IPV could be a useful tool to identify patients with a greater risk of graft rejection and of developing a de novo DSA after liver