Therapeutic Outcomes of HPV Positive and HPV Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Background & Objectives: HPV associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancers, compared with HPV non-associated ones (HPV?) have different characters and significantly better outcomes. HPV and cancer characteristics differ among countries and few data is available in Indian population regarding this issue. Thus, we attempted to determine the treatment response and survival rates between HPV+ versus HPV negative oropharyngeal cancers in Indian population. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted from December 2016 - October 2018 in patients with stage III/IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) (n = 65). The patients received induction chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-Fluorouracil × 3 cycles, followed by concurrent chemoradiation 66 Gy as 33 fractions along with cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly. The primary outcome was treatment response rate, which was defined as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria. Secondary outcomes were clinico-pathological differences between two groups, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 65 patients included in the study, 17 were HPV positive and 48 patients were HPV negative. Median age in HPV positive arm is 48 years and HPV negative arm is 59 years. HPV positive patients presented with early T stage and advanced nodal (N) stage. Most common histopathology in both arms was moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinomas followed by well differentiated squamous cell carcinomas. HPV+ vs HPV? showed the following, treatment response 82.4% vs 52.1% (p-0.029). 1 year progression free survival (PFS) of 76.5% vs 52.1% in HPV negative arm (p-0.08) & 1 year overall survival was 82.4% vs 70.8% (p-0.353). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities did not differ significantly between HPV positive and HPV negative arms. Conclusion: HPV positive oropharyngeal SCC patients showed significantly better treatment response than HPV negative ones. Progression free survival, overall survival and toxicity profile did not differ significantly between the two groups. Although due to small size, we did not compare data stratified by the cancer characteristics, the data is worthy to further characterize this tumour especially as HPV positive versus HPV negative.

Is Cancer Still the Villain, Even during COVID 19 Outbreak?

Background :Anxiety and depression are two common psychiatric conditions encountered in cancer treatment. Prevalence rate and risk factors show wide variations in different countries and the environment. COVID 19 outbreak has increased psychological disorders in general public and health workers. Whether this pandemic has increased the psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients needs to be addressed for planning strategies. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiation Oncology, a tertiary cancer centre in the state of Kerala, India. The aim was to assess hospital prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression among cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic. Patients on treatment for cancer and willing for the study were recruited. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a self-assessment valid tool for screening both anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) are used. HADS-A & D were calculated separately & categorized as normal, borderline and abnormal with a score of 0 - 7, 8 - 10 & 11 - 21 respectively. Separate structured questionnaire for COVID19 related questions and patient master file for patient & treatment characteristics were used in risk assessment. Data were entered in an Excel sheet and SPSS version 22 for statistical analysis. Findings: 208 patients were included in this study. The overall prevalence rate of anxiety was 7.2%, with borderline cases 4.3% and abnormal cases 2.9%. The overall prevalence of the rate of depression was 5.3% (3.4% borderline & 1.9% abnormal). Risk factors like age, sex, socioeconomic status, primary site, stage of the disease and default of disease had no statistical significance. Interpretation: The prevalence rate of anxiety and depression among cancer patients in this study is one among the lowest ever reported. COVID 19 outbreak has not brought any impact in the rate of psychological distress in our patients and the low rate may be due to the robust medical care including mental health interventions and reassurance by the Government.

A Comparative Study of the Recurrence Rate in Hypofractionated versus Conventional Postmastectomy Radiation in Breast Cancer

Background: Treatment options available for breast cancer are Surgery [Breast conservation surgery (BCS) or Modified radical mastectomy (MRM)];Radiation treatment [Conventional radiation treatment or CRT and Hypofractionated radiation treatment or HRT] and Chemotherapy. In the postmastectomy or post lumpectomy setting, radiotherapy (RT) improves loco-regional control. CRT for breast includes 50 Gy in 25 fractions (2 Gy per fraction) and HRT includes 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions (2.7 Gy per fraction) or extreme hypofractionation like 26 Gy in 5 fractions. Alpha/beta value for breast is less, so HRT is ideal for breast. So, there will be good loco-regional control, without increased normal tissue damage. This study aims to identify recurrence rate and toxicity in breast cancer patients treated using conventional and hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy among Indian population. Primary objective: To assess recurrence rate of disease in breast cancer patients treated using hypofractionated postmastectomy radiation and to compare it with breast cancer patients treated using conventional postmastectomy radiation. Secondary objective: To assess the toxicity in hypofractionation and conventional fractionation arm. Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted in Department of Radiation Oncology from December 2017 to June 2019. Radically treated breast cancer patients who received radiation treatment either conventional or hypofractionated as one of the treatment modalities were included in the study. Data were collected using a structured proforma, history and physical examination, master file of the patients, lab results and the imaging reports, written informed consent form, ECOG performance status scale (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema. Patients were monitored for 18 months to identify recurrence rate and toxicity in each arm. Results and discussion: A total of 241 patients were enrolled into this study, among them 175 patients (73%) were given hypofractionation radiotherapy and 66 patients (27%) were given conventional radiotherapy. In hypofractionation arm, recurrence was found in 14 patients (8%), of which, 3 were local recurrences [chest wall] and 11 were systemic recurrences, while in conventional arm, recurrence was found in 4 patients (6%) and all of them were systemic recurrences. Recurrence rate in hypofractionation arm was 8% and in conventional arm was 6.10%. The Kaplan Meier curve shows no significant difference between the two arms with p value = 0.76. Acute toxicities assessed were dermatitis, esophagitis and pneumonitis. Among acute dermatitis, 4 patients had grade 3 and 2 patients had grade 4 in hypofractionation arm, while in conventional arm, 7 patients had grade 3 and 1 patient had grade 4. Grade 1 and 2 together versus grade 3 and 4 acute dermatitis showed a statistically significant difference between the two arms, with more acute toxicity in the conventional arm. Among acute esophagitis, 1 patient had grade 3 and no patients had grade 4 in hypofractionation arm;while in conventional arm, no grade 3 and grade 4 acute esophagitis were found. Among acute pneumonitis, 2 patients had grade 3 and 1 patient had grade 4 in hypofractionation arm, while in conventional arm, 1 patient had grade 3 and no patients with grade 4 were found. Grade 2 and grade 3 acute lung toxicities were found in patients with central lung distance more than 1.5 cm. Conclusion: It was found that the recurrence rate of hypofractionation radiotherapy was comparable to conventional fractionation radiotherapy. With respect to acute dermatitis, grade 1 and grade 2 were significantly more in conventional than hypofractionation arm. Hypofractionated radiotherapy is an equally effective option to conventional radiotherapy and should be encouraged, especially for developing countries like India where the resource is limited, and the incidence of tumour is high.

Pattern of Recurrence in Radically Treated Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Background: In India approximately 20% of the patients with breast cancer are triple receptor negative. Owing to the aggressive nature and shorter disease-free survival judicious follow up and identification of failure pattern will benefit the patient. Similar studies have been conducted among non-Hispanic population and in China. This study aims to identify failure pattern in radically treated breast cancer patients who are triple receptor negative among Indian population. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiation Oncology, a tertiary cancer centre in Kerala, India. The objective was to record the pattern of recurrence among triple negative breast cancer patients who completed their planned radical treatment. 171 patients with triple negative breast cancer were included in the study. Patients who completed the planned radical treatment were kept under regular follow up. Details of clinical examination and investigations during the follow up were recorded periodically. Results: Out of 171 patients 30 patients had a recurrence of disease. Median age of the population was 53 years. Among the 30 patients who had a recurrence, 16 patients (53%) had systemic relapse and 14 patients (47%) had locoregional relapse. Lung was found to be the most common site of distant metastasis (37%). Ipsilateral chest wall was found to be the most common site of locoregional relapse (50%). 6 months disease free survival was found to be 91.8% and 1-year disease free survival was found to be 70.2%. Conclusion: Among radically treated triple negative breast cancers relapses, systemic recurrence was more than locoregional recurrences.