Background:Reproductive,maternal,newborn,child health,and nutrition(RMNCH&N)data is an indispensable tool for program and policy decisions in low-and middle-income countries.However,being equipped with evidence do...Background:Reproductive,maternal,newborn,child health,and nutrition(RMNCH&N)data is an indispensable tool for program and policy decisions in low-and middle-income countries.However,being equipped with evidence doesn’t necessarily translate to program and policy changes.This study aimed to characterize data visualization interpretation capacity and preferences among RMNCH&N Tanzanian program implementers and policymakers(“decision-makers”)to design more effective approaches towards promoting evidence-based RMNCH&N decisions in Tanzania.Methods:We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews in Kiswahili with junior,mid-level,and senior RMNCH&N decision-makers working in Tanzanian government institutions.We used snowball sampling to recruit participants with different rank and roles in RMNCH&N decision-making.Using semi-structured interviews,we probed participants on their statistical skills and data use,and asked participants to identify key messages and rank prepared RMNCH&N visualizations.We used a grounded theory approach to organize themes and identify findings.Results:The findings suggest that data literacy and statistical skills among RMNCH&N decision-makers in Tanzania varies.Most participants demonstrated awareness of many critical factors that should influence a visualization choice—audience,key message,simplicity—but assessments of data interpretation and preferences suggest that there may be weak knowledge of basic statistics.A majority of decision-makers have not had any statistical training since attending university.There appeared to be some discomfort with interpreting and using visualizations that are not bar charts,pie charts,and maps.Conclusions:Decision-makers must be able to understand and interpret RMNCH&N data they receive to be empowered to act.Addressing inadequate data literacy and presentation skills among decision-makers is vital to bridging gaps between evidence and policymaking.It would be beneficial to host basic data literacy and visualization training for RMNCH&N decision-makers at all levels in Tanzania,and to expand skills on developing key messages from visualizations.展开更多
基金Grant Number 7059904 on the“National Evaluation Platform Approach for Accountability in Women’s and Children’s Health”from the Department of Global Affairs Canada to the Institute for International Programs at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
文摘Background:Reproductive,maternal,newborn,child health,and nutrition(RMNCH&N)data is an indispensable tool for program and policy decisions in low-and middle-income countries.However,being equipped with evidence doesn’t necessarily translate to program and policy changes.This study aimed to characterize data visualization interpretation capacity and preferences among RMNCH&N Tanzanian program implementers and policymakers(“decision-makers”)to design more effective approaches towards promoting evidence-based RMNCH&N decisions in Tanzania.Methods:We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews in Kiswahili with junior,mid-level,and senior RMNCH&N decision-makers working in Tanzanian government institutions.We used snowball sampling to recruit participants with different rank and roles in RMNCH&N decision-making.Using semi-structured interviews,we probed participants on their statistical skills and data use,and asked participants to identify key messages and rank prepared RMNCH&N visualizations.We used a grounded theory approach to organize themes and identify findings.Results:The findings suggest that data literacy and statistical skills among RMNCH&N decision-makers in Tanzania varies.Most participants demonstrated awareness of many critical factors that should influence a visualization choice—audience,key message,simplicity—but assessments of data interpretation and preferences suggest that there may be weak knowledge of basic statistics.A majority of decision-makers have not had any statistical training since attending university.There appeared to be some discomfort with interpreting and using visualizations that are not bar charts,pie charts,and maps.Conclusions:Decision-makers must be able to understand and interpret RMNCH&N data they receive to be empowered to act.Addressing inadequate data literacy and presentation skills among decision-makers is vital to bridging gaps between evidence and policymaking.It would be beneficial to host basic data literacy and visualization training for RMNCH&N decision-makers at all levels in Tanzania,and to expand skills on developing key messages from visualizations.