Statin, aspirin and metformin use and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma related outcomes following liver transplantation: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND Liver transplantation(LT)is a potentially curative therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).HCC-recurrence following LT is associated with reduced survival.There is increasing interest in chemoprophylaxis to improve HCC-related outcomes post-LT.AIM To investigate whether there is any benefit for the use of drugs with proposed chemoprophylactic properties against HCC,and patient outcomes following LT.METHODS This was a retrospective study of adult patients who received Deceased Donor LT for HCC from 2005-2022,from a single Australian centre.Drug use was defined as statin,aspirin or metformin therapy for≥29 days,within 24 months post-LT.A cox proportional-hazards model with time-dependent covariates was used for survival analysis.Outcome measures were the composite-endpoint of HCC-recurrence and all-cause mortality,HCC-recurrence and HCC-related mortality.Sensitivity analysis was performed to account for immortality time bias and statin dosing.RESULTS Three hundred and five patients were included in this study,with 253(82.95%)males with a median age of 58.90 years.Aetiologies of liver disease were 150(49.18%)hepatitis C,73(23.93%)hepatitis B(HBV)and 33(10.82%)non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD).56(18.36%)took statins,51(16.72%)aspirin and 50(16.39%)metformin.During a median follow-up time of 59.90 months,34(11.15%)developed HCC-recurrence,48(15.74%)died,17(5.57%)from HCC-related mortality.Statin,aspirin or metformin use was not associated with statistically significant differences in the composite endpoint of HCC-recurrence or all-cause mortality[hazard ratio(HR):1.16,95%CI:0.58-2.30;HR:1.21,95%CI:0.28-5.27;HR:0.61,95%CI:0.27-1.36],HCC-recurrence(HR:0.52,95%CI:0.20-1.35;HR:0.51,95%CI:0.14-1.93;HR 1.00,95%CI:0.37-2.72),or HCC-related mortality(HR:0.32,95%CI:0.033-3.09;HR:0.71,95%CI:0.14-3.73;HR:1.57,95%CI:0.61-4.04)respectively.Statin dosing was not associated with statist-ically significant differences in HCC-related outcomes.CONCLUSION Statin,metformin or aspirin use was not associated with improved HCC-related outcomes post-LT,in a largely historical cohort of Australian patients with a low proportion of NAFLD.Further prospective,multicentre studies are required to clarify any potential benefit of these drugs to improve HCC-related outcomes.

AIMS65: A promising upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk score but further validation required

A novel upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification score(AIMS65) has recently been developed and validated. It has advantages over existing risk scores including being easy to remember and lack of subjectivity in calculation. We comment on a recent study that has cast doubt on the applicability of AIMS65 in the peptic ulcer disease population. Although promising, further studies are required to evaluate the validity of AIMS65 in various populations.

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease:Addressing a new era in liver transplantation

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease(MAFLD),previously termed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,is the leading global cause of liver disease and is fast becoming the most common indication for liver transplantation.The recent change in nomenclature to MAFLD refocuses the conceptualisation of this disease entity to its metabolic underpinnings and may help to spur a paradigm shift in the approach to its management,including in the setting of liver transplantation.Patients with MAFLD present significant challenges in the pre-,peri-and posttransplant settings,largely due to the presence of medical comorbidities that include obesity,metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk factors.As the community prevalence of MAFLD increases concurrently with the obesity epidemic,donor liver steatosis is also a current and future concern.This review outlines current epidemiology,nomenclature,management issues and outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with MAFLD.

Prevalence and outcomes of pancreatic cystic neoplasms in liver transplant recipients

AIM To determine the prevalence,characteristics and clinical course of pancreatic cystic neoplasms(PCNs) in liver transplantation(LT) recipients.METHODS We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent LT between January 1998 to April 2016. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from patient medical records. Imaging findings on computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were reviewed by two radiologists.RESULTS During the study period,872 patients underwent cadaveric LT. Pancreatic cysts were identified in 53/872(6.1%) and 31/53(58.5%) were PCNs [28 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm(IPMN),2 mucinous cystic neoplasm(MCN),1 serous cystadenoma]. Patients with PCNs exhibited less male predominance(55% vs 73%,P = 0.03) compared to patients without pancreatic cysts. Thirteen patients(42%) were diagnosed with PCN pre-LT while 18 patients(58%) developed PCN post-LT. The median size of PCNs was 13 mm [interquartile range(IQR) 10-20 mm]. All IPMNs were side-branch type. Most PCNs were found in the head and body of pancreas(37% each),followed by the tail(25%). Five patients underwent further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound. Progress imaging was performed on 81% of patients. PCNs remained stable in size and number in all but 2 patients. During a median follow up of 39 mo(IQR 26-58 mo),the 2(6%) patients with MCN underwent pancreatectomy. No PCN patient developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma,while 5 died from illnesses unrelated to the PCN. Among patients without PCN,1/841(0.1%) developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma.CONCLUSION The prevalence of PCNs in LT recipients was similar to the general population(3.6%,31/872). Side-branch IPMNs do not appear to have accelerated malignant potential in post-LT patients,indicating the current surveillance guidelines are applicable to this group.

Outcomes of microwave versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Studies to date comparing outcomes of microwave ablation(MWA)with radiofrequency ablation(RFA)on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma have yielded conflicting results,with no clear superiority of one technique over the other.The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of MWA with RFA.AIM To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of MWA with RFA.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using Ovid Medline,Embase,PubMed,Reference Citation Analysis,Cochrane Central and Cochrane Systematic Review databases,and Web of Science.Abstracts and full manuscripts were screened for inclusion utilising predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria comparing outcomes of MWA and RFA.A random-effects model was used for each outcome.Meta-regression analysis was performed to adjust for the difference in follow-up period between the studies.Primary outcome measures included complete ablation(CA)rate,local recurrence rate(LRR),survival[local recurrence-free survival(LRFS),overall survival(OS)]and adverse events.RESULTS A total of 42 published studies[34 cohort and 8 randomised controlled trials(RCT)]with 6719 patients fulfilled the selection criteria.There was no significant difference in tumour size between the treatment groups.CA rates between MWA and RFA groups were similar in prospective cohort studies[odds ratio(OR)0.95,95%confidence interval(CI)0.28–3.23]and RCTs(OR 1.18,95%CI 0.64–2.18).However,retrospective studies reported higher rates with MWA(OR 1.29,95%CI 1.06–1.57).Retrospective cohort studies reported higher OS(OR 1.54,95%CI 1.15–2.05 and lower LRR(OR 0.67,95%CI 0.51–0.87).No difference in terms of LRFS or 30-d mortality was observed between both arms.MWA had an increased rate of adverse respiratory events when compared to RFA(OR 1.99,95%CI 1.07–3.71,P=0.03).CONCLUSION MWA achieves similar CA rates and as good or better longer-term outcomes in relation to LRR and OS compared to RFA.Apart from an increased rate of respiratory events post procedure,MWA is as safe as RFA.