Objective:Circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA)is increasingly being used as a potential prognostic biomarker in cancer patients.We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in different subtypes of breast cancer patients ...Objective:Circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA)is increasingly being used as a potential prognostic biomarker in cancer patients.We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in different subtypes of breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle.Materials and methods:PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,Scopus,and clinical trials.gov databases were searched from January 2016 to May 2022.The following search terms were used:ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma.Only studies written in English were included.The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion:(i)original articles,conference abstracts,etc.;(ii)patients with breast cancer;(iii)ctDNA measurement;and(iv)clinical outcome data such as recurrence-free survival(RFS)and overall survival(OS).The random-effects model was preferred considering the potential het-erogeneity across studies.The main outcomes are ctDNA detection rate and postoperative long-term outcomes(RFS and OS).Results:A total of 24 studies were screened.At every measurement time,the ctDNA detection rate of the HR+subgroup was similar to that of the HR-subgroup(P=0.075;P=0.458;P=0.744;and P=0.578),and the ctDNA detection rate of the HER2+subgroup was similar to that of the HER2-subgroup(P=0.805;P=0.271;P=0.807;and P=0.703).In the HR+subgroup,RFS and OS of ctDNA positive patients were similar to those of ctDNA negative patients(P=0.589 and P=0.110),while RFS and OS of the ctDNA positive group was significantly shorter than those of the ctDNA negative patients in the HR-subgroup(HR=4.03,P<0.001;HR=3.21,P<0.001).According to HER grouping,the results were the same as above.In the triple negative breast cancer(TNBC)subgroup,the RFS and OS of ctDNA-positive patients was significantly shorter than of the ctDNA negative patients before and after surgery.Conclusions:ctDNA was more predictive of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the HR-subgroup than in the HR+subgroup,and the same result was showed in the HER2-subgroup vs.HER2+subgroup.The prognosis of the TNBC subtype is closely related to ctDNA before and after surgery.展开更多
Objective: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognosis biomarker in patients of breast cancer. This review aims to assess the clinical value of ctDNA in outcome prediction in brea...Objective: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognosis biomarker in patients of breast cancer. This review aims to assess the clinical value of ctDNA in outcome prediction in breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. Conference abstracts published in last three years were also included. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English languages were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (1) observational studies (prospective or retrospective), randomized control trials, case-control studies and case series studies;(2) patients with breast cancer;(3) ctDNA measurement;(4) clinical outcome data such as objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and so on. The random-effect model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The primary outcomes included postoperative short-term outcomes (ORR and pCR) and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS, OS, and relapse). Secondary outcomes focused on ctDNA detection rate. Results: A total of 30 studies, comprising of 19 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies and 9 case series studies were included. The baseline ctDNA was significantly negatively associated with ORR outcome (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50–0.83), with lower ORR in the ctDNA-positive group than ctDNAnegative group. ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) treatment was significantly associated with pCR outcomes (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.54). The strong association between ctDNA and RFS or relapse outcome was significant across the whole treatment period, especially after the surgery (RFS: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 6.74, 95% CI: 3.73–12.17;relapse outcome: RR = 7.11, 95% CI: 3.05–16.53), although there was heterogeneity in these results. Pre-operative and post-operative ctDNA measurements were significantly associated with OS outcomes (pre-operative: HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12–3.70;post-operative: HR = 6.03, 95% CI: 1.31–27.78). Conclusions: In this review, ctDNA measurements at different timepoints are correlated with evaluation indexes at different periods after treatment. The ctDNA can be used as an early potential postoperative prognosis biomarker in breast cancer, and also as a reference index to evaluate the therapeutic effect at different stages.展开更多
基金funded by the Capital’s Funds for Health Improve-ment and Research(grant number:2024-1G-4023)the Special Project for Director,China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine(grant number:2020YJSZX-2)the National Natural Sci-ence Foundation of China(grant number:72074011)。
文摘Objective:Circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA)is increasingly being used as a potential prognostic biomarker in cancer patients.We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in different subtypes of breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle.Materials and methods:PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,Scopus,and clinical trials.gov databases were searched from January 2016 to May 2022.The following search terms were used:ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma.Only studies written in English were included.The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion:(i)original articles,conference abstracts,etc.;(ii)patients with breast cancer;(iii)ctDNA measurement;and(iv)clinical outcome data such as recurrence-free survival(RFS)and overall survival(OS).The random-effects model was preferred considering the potential het-erogeneity across studies.The main outcomes are ctDNA detection rate and postoperative long-term outcomes(RFS and OS).Results:A total of 24 studies were screened.At every measurement time,the ctDNA detection rate of the HR+subgroup was similar to that of the HR-subgroup(P=0.075;P=0.458;P=0.744;and P=0.578),and the ctDNA detection rate of the HER2+subgroup was similar to that of the HER2-subgroup(P=0.805;P=0.271;P=0.807;and P=0.703).In the HR+subgroup,RFS and OS of ctDNA positive patients were similar to those of ctDNA negative patients(P=0.589 and P=0.110),while RFS and OS of the ctDNA positive group was significantly shorter than those of the ctDNA negative patients in the HR-subgroup(HR=4.03,P<0.001;HR=3.21,P<0.001).According to HER grouping,the results were the same as above.In the triple negative breast cancer(TNBC)subgroup,the RFS and OS of ctDNA-positive patients was significantly shorter than of the ctDNA negative patients before and after surgery.Conclusions:ctDNA was more predictive of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the HR-subgroup than in the HR+subgroup,and the same result was showed in the HER2-subgroup vs.HER2+subgroup.The prognosis of the TNBC subtype is closely related to ctDNA before and after surgery.
基金funded by the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research(grant number:2024-1G-4023)the Special Project for Director,China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine(grant number:2020YJSZX-2)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(grant number:72074011).
文摘Objective: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognosis biomarker in patients of breast cancer. This review aims to assess the clinical value of ctDNA in outcome prediction in breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. Conference abstracts published in last three years were also included. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English languages were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (1) observational studies (prospective or retrospective), randomized control trials, case-control studies and case series studies;(2) patients with breast cancer;(3) ctDNA measurement;(4) clinical outcome data such as objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and so on. The random-effect model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The primary outcomes included postoperative short-term outcomes (ORR and pCR) and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS, OS, and relapse). Secondary outcomes focused on ctDNA detection rate. Results: A total of 30 studies, comprising of 19 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies and 9 case series studies were included. The baseline ctDNA was significantly negatively associated with ORR outcome (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50–0.83), with lower ORR in the ctDNA-positive group than ctDNAnegative group. ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) treatment was significantly associated with pCR outcomes (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.54). The strong association between ctDNA and RFS or relapse outcome was significant across the whole treatment period, especially after the surgery (RFS: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 6.74, 95% CI: 3.73–12.17;relapse outcome: RR = 7.11, 95% CI: 3.05–16.53), although there was heterogeneity in these results. Pre-operative and post-operative ctDNA measurements were significantly associated with OS outcomes (pre-operative: HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12–3.70;post-operative: HR = 6.03, 95% CI: 1.31–27.78). Conclusions: In this review, ctDNA measurements at different timepoints are correlated with evaluation indexes at different periods after treatment. The ctDNA can be used as an early potential postoperative prognosis biomarker in breast cancer, and also as a reference index to evaluate the therapeutic effect at different stages.