期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
农田节肢动物不同取样方法的综合比较 被引量:9
1
作者 段美春 覃如霞 +9 位作者 张宏斌 陈宝雄 金彬 张松泊 任少鹏 金树权 朱升海 华家宁 刘云慧 宇振荣 《生物多样性》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期477-487,共11页
农田节肢动物多样性具有病虫害控制、传粉等价值,选择一种或多种适宜、准确且高效的取样方法和指示类群来衡量农田节肢动物多样性是一项基础性工作。本文通过地表陷阱法、挂盆陷阱法、扫网法、目测计数法和吸虫器法在有机管理和常规管... 农田节肢动物多样性具有病虫害控制、传粉等价值,选择一种或多种适宜、准确且高效的取样方法和指示类群来衡量农田节肢动物多样性是一项基础性工作。本文通过地表陷阱法、挂盆陷阱法、扫网法、目测计数法和吸虫器法在有机管理和常规管理农田区的不同农业生境类型中取样,比较不同方法对不同生物类群的捕获效率、经济成本、响应敏感性等。研究发现在捕获效率方面,地陷法和挂盆法最高,其次是扫网法,而吸虫器法和目测计数法较差。挂盆法对步甲、蜘蛛、蜂类和瓢虫类群的捕获效率较佳。陷阱法主要适用于蜘蛛和步甲的取样,扫网法也可用于蜘蛛和瓢虫的取样。在经济成本方面,地陷法的成本最低,扫网法的总成本最高。每种取样方法下仅有个别类群个体数量具有较好的响应敏感性,如地陷法的蜘蛛目个体数和步甲科个体数、挂盆法的总个体数、蜂类个体数和瓢虫科个体数、扫网法的直翅目个体数和半翅目个体数等。在此基础上,综合类群经济价值,操作难易,类群鉴定难度,被动取样程度,是否受取样人影响等比较发现:地陷法对步甲和蜘蛛的取样的综合效果最佳,而不同取样方法下多种类群的组合能更好地监测和评价农田节肢动物多样性的整体情况。地陷法捕获步甲或/和蜘蛛以及挂盆法调查蜂类的组合是基于本研究得出的调查农田节肢动物多样性的最佳组合。 展开更多
关键词 节肢动物 取样方法 农田生物多样性 农田生态系统 农业昆虫
原文传递
Effects of livestock exclusion and climate change on aboveground biomass accumulation in alpine pastures across the Northern Tibetan Plateau 被引量:11
2
作者 Jianshuang Wu Xianzhou Zhang +3 位作者 Zhenxi Shen Peili Shi chengqun Yu baoxiong chen 《Chinese Science Bulletin》 SCIE EI CAS 2014年第32期4332-4340,共9页
To better understand the ecological and economic benefits of short-term grazing exclusion on the aboveground net primary productivity(ANPP)of alpine pastures,we conducted annual multi-site transect surveys in the summ... To better understand the ecological and economic benefits of short-term grazing exclusion on the aboveground net primary productivity(ANPP)of alpine pastures,we conducted annual multi-site transect surveys in the summers from 2009 to 2011 and calculated the aboveground biomass discrepancy(ABD)between grazed and ungrazed pastures at plant community and economic group levels for three zonal alpine grassland types—meadow,steppe,and desert-steppe—across the northern Tibetan Plateau.Our results indicated that aboveground biomass(AGB)significantly differed among grassland types and declined northwesterly from 64.07 to11.44 g m-2with decreasing precipitation and increasing temperature.The mean ABD exhibited considerable community dependency,with meadow(12.47 g m-2)[steppe(6.91 g m-2)[desert steppe(2.54 g m-2),and it declined from 25.42 to 1.29 g m-2with decreasing precipitation and increasing temperature.‘Good forage’,i.e.grasses and sedges,benefited most from grazing exclusion,followed by edible forbs.With longer grazing exclusion durations(GEDs),the aboveground biomass of poisonous locoweeds initially decreased and then increased compared with the adjacent grazed sites.In the nested analysis of co-variances with a general linear model,growing season precipitation(GSP;from May to September)accounted for 52.67%ofthe observed variation in AGB,followed by AGT(9.77%)and pasture management systems(PMSs;grazing or grazing-excluded,5.31%).The variation in ABD was explained primarily by AGT(16.52%),GED(20.25%),and the interaction of AGT 9 GED(19.58%).Our results confirm that precipitation is the primary factor controlling the ANPP of alpine grasslands on the Northern Tibetan Plateau and that the ecological benefits arising from grazing exclusion are also partly dependent on grassland type and exclusion duration.Therefore,spatial and temporal variations in growing season precipitation and plant functional traits or economic group composition should be jointly considered when developing policies concerning the management and spatial layouts of grazing exclosures in this region. 展开更多
关键词 地上生物量 藏北高原 生物量积累 牧场 高山 气候变化 荒漠草原 牲畜
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部