Background: We present two cases of Toxicodendron dermatitis, one acquired in the United States but presenting in the United Kingdom (UK), the other a recurrent dermatitis following importation of the plant to the UK....Background: We present two cases of Toxicodendron dermatitis, one acquired in the United States but presenting in the United Kingdom (UK), the other a recurrent dermatitis following importation of the plant to the UK. Poison ivy, poison oak and poison sumac are native to North America and belong to the genus Toxicodendron. This group of plants is of interest to the dermatologist because they contain a mixture of potent sensitisers which cause a severe allergic contact dermatitis. Conclusions: The dermatitis can present to the dermatologist in Europe after an individual has been in contact with the plant whilst visiting an endemic area. The plants have the potential to grow in Europe and it is therefore possible for an individual to be sensitised and subsequently to develop the rash without leaving the continent.展开更多
Contact with metal working fluids (MWF) is an important factor in the development of occupational hand dermatitis in patients working in the metal processing industry. Biocides are added to MWF as preservatives and ar...Contact with metal working fluids (MWF) is an important factor in the development of occupational hand dermatitis in patients working in the metal processing industry. Biocides are added to MWF as preservatives and are known sensitizers. We analysed 318 patch test reactions to N,N-methylene-bis-5-methyl-oxazolidine 1% in petrolatum (5-methyloxazolidine, Grotan OX , CAS no. 66204- 44- 2, a formaldehyde releasing biocide) present in coolant oils in patients exposed to MWF and with suspected occupational dermatitis (OD). Positive allergic reactions were noted in 15 (4.7% ) cases. In 7 (47% ) cases, we were able to confirm relevance by examining the material safety data sheets and these showed that N,N-methylene-bis-5-methyloxazolidine was present in the oils used by the patients. No certain relevance could be proved in 8 cases, but in these instances, further information on the biocides used in the oils could not be obtained. Positive reactions to formaldehyde were seen in 11 (73% ) patients. Sensitization either to this biocide and/or formaldehyde allergy was considered to have been likely to have made a contribution to the workers’ dermatitis.展开更多
文摘Background: We present two cases of Toxicodendron dermatitis, one acquired in the United States but presenting in the United Kingdom (UK), the other a recurrent dermatitis following importation of the plant to the UK. Poison ivy, poison oak and poison sumac are native to North America and belong to the genus Toxicodendron. This group of plants is of interest to the dermatologist because they contain a mixture of potent sensitisers which cause a severe allergic contact dermatitis. Conclusions: The dermatitis can present to the dermatologist in Europe after an individual has been in contact with the plant whilst visiting an endemic area. The plants have the potential to grow in Europe and it is therefore possible for an individual to be sensitised and subsequently to develop the rash without leaving the continent.
文摘Contact with metal working fluids (MWF) is an important factor in the development of occupational hand dermatitis in patients working in the metal processing industry. Biocides are added to MWF as preservatives and are known sensitizers. We analysed 318 patch test reactions to N,N-methylene-bis-5-methyl-oxazolidine 1% in petrolatum (5-methyloxazolidine, Grotan OX , CAS no. 66204- 44- 2, a formaldehyde releasing biocide) present in coolant oils in patients exposed to MWF and with suspected occupational dermatitis (OD). Positive allergic reactions were noted in 15 (4.7% ) cases. In 7 (47% ) cases, we were able to confirm relevance by examining the material safety data sheets and these showed that N,N-methylene-bis-5-methyloxazolidine was present in the oils used by the patients. No certain relevance could be proved in 8 cases, but in these instances, further information on the biocides used in the oils could not be obtained. Positive reactions to formaldehyde were seen in 11 (73% ) patients. Sensitization either to this biocide and/or formaldehyde allergy was considered to have been likely to have made a contribution to the workers’ dermatitis.
