期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis: Current evidence for clinical practice 被引量:2
1
作者 Alberto Ferrarese Nicola Passigato +6 位作者 caterina cusumano Stefano Gemini Angelo Tonon Elton Dajti Giovanni Marasco Federico Ravaioli Antonio Colecchia 《World Journal of Hepatology》 2021年第8期840-852,共13页
Patients with cirrhosis show an increased susceptibility to infection due to disease-related immune-dysfunction.Bacterial infection therefore represents a common,often detrimental event in patients with advanced liver... Patients with cirrhosis show an increased susceptibility to infection due to disease-related immune-dysfunction.Bacterial infection therefore represents a common,often detrimental event in patients with advanced liver disease,since it can worsen portal hypertension and impair the function of hepatic and extrahepatic organs.Among pharmacological strategies to prevent infection,antibiotic prophylaxis remains the first-choice,especially in high-risk groups,such as patients with acute variceal bleeding,low ascitic fluid proteins,and prior episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.Nevertheless,antibiotic prophylaxis has to deal with the changing bacterial epidemiology in cirrhosis,with increased rates of gram-positive bacteria and multidrug resistant rods,warnings about quinolonesrelated side effects,and low prescription adherence.Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis is applied in many other settings during hospitalization,such as before interventional or surgical procedures,but often without knowledge of local bacterial epidemiology and without strict adherence to antimicrobial stewardship.This paper offers a detailed overview on the application of antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhosis,according to the current evidence. 展开更多
关键词 CIRRHOSIS QUINOLONES Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Liver transplantation Trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt Variceal bleeding
下载PDF
Perioperative impact of liver venous deprivation compared with portal venous embolization in patients undergoing right hepatectomy: preliminary results from the pioneer center 被引量:16
2
作者 Fabrizio Panaro Fabio Giannone +6 位作者 Benjamin Riviere Olivia Sgarbura caterina cusumano Emmanuel Deshayes Francis Navarro Boris Guiu Francois Quenet 《Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition》 SCIE 2019年第4期329-337,共9页
Background: Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is currently the standard technique used routinely to increase the size of the future remnant liver (FRL) before major hepatectomies. The degree of hypertrophy (... Background: Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is currently the standard technique used routinely to increase the size of the future remnant liver (FRL) before major hepatectomies. The degree of hypertrophy (DH) is approximatively 10% and requires on average six weeks. ALPPS is faster and achieves a good DH but with a higher morbidity and mortality. One method recently proposed to increase the FRL is liver venous deprivation (LVD), but its clinical and operative impact is still unknown. The aim of this study is to compare intra- and postoperative morbidity/mortality and the histological evaluation of the liver parenchyma between PVE and LVD in patients undergoing anatomic right hepatectomy. Methods: Fifty-three consecutive patients undergoing PVE and LVD before a major hepatectomy were retrospectively analysed between 2015 and 2017. In order to reduce the bias, only potential standard right hepatectomies were selected. Surgical resections and the radiologic procedures were performed by the same Institution. Intra-operative parameters (transfusions, perfusions, bleeding, operative time), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo and ISGLS criteria), and histological findings were compared. Results: To induce FRL growth 16 patients underwent PVE and 13 LVD. One patient of the PVE group was not resected due to peritoneal metastases. Surgery was performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (PVE =9, LVD=3), metastases (PVE =5, LVD =10), or others diseases (PVE =2, LVD =0). Per- and post-operative morbidity/mortality rates after PVE and LVD procedures were null. No differences between the two groups were found in terms of intraoperative bleeding (median: 550 vs. 1,200 mL;P=0.36), hepatic pedicle clamping (5 vs. 3 patients;P=0.69), intraoperative red blood cells transfusions (median: 622 vs. 594;P=0.42) and operative time (median:270 vs. 330 min;P=0.34). Post-operative course was similar when comparing both medical and surgical complications in the two arms (PVE n=7, LVD n=10, P=0.1). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa) occurred in 3 patients undergoing PVE and in 1 patient of the LVD group (P=0.6). No difference in biliary leak (P=0.1), haemorrhage (P=0.2) and liver failure (P=0.64) was found. One cirrhotic patient in the group of PVE died of post-operative liver failure due to left portal vein thrombosis. Although we experienced a more marked liver damage when assessing on neoplastic liver parenchyma, no statistical difference was observed in terms of atrophy (P=0.19), necrosis (P=0.5), hemorrhage (P=0.42) and sinusoidal dilatation (P=0.69). Conclusions: Despite the limitations of our study, to our knowledge this is the first report to compare the;two techniques LVD is a promising and safe procedure to induce a fast FRL hypertrophy, showing similar mortality/morbidity rates during and after surgery compared to PVE. 展开更多
关键词 LIVER VENOUS DEPRIVATION (LVD) PORTAL EMBOLIZATION LIVER failure hepatectomy
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部