Particle image velocimetry(PIV)is an essential method in experimental fluid dynamics.In recent years,the development of deep learning‐based methods has inspired new ap-proaches to tackle the PIV problem,which conside...Particle image velocimetry(PIV)is an essential method in experimental fluid dynamics.In recent years,the development of deep learning‐based methods has inspired new ap-proaches to tackle the PIV problem,which considerably improves the accuracy of PIV.However,the supervised learning of PIV is driven by large volumes of data with ground truth information.Therefore,the authors consider unsupervised PIV methods.There has been some work on unsupervised PIV,but they are not nearly as effective as supervised learning PIV.The authors try to improve the effectiveness and accuracy of unsupervised PIV by adding classical PIV methods and physical constraints.In this paper,the authors propose an unsupervised PIV method combined with the cross‐correlation method and divergence‐free constraint,which obtains better performance than other unsupervised PIV methods.The authors compare some classical PIV methods and some deep learning methods,such as LiteFlowNet,LiteFlowNet‐en,and UnLiteFlowNet with the authors’model on the synthetic dataset.Besides,the authors contrast the results of LiteFlowNet,UnLiteFlowNet and the authors’model on experimental particle images.As a result,the authors’model shows comparable performance with classical PIV methods as well as supervised PIV methods and outperforms the previous unsupervised PIV method in most flow cases.展开更多
基金Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province,Grant/Award Number:LY21F030003National Key Research and Development Program of China,Grant/Award Number:2019YFB1705800National Natural Science Foundation of China,Grant/Award Number:61973270。
文摘Particle image velocimetry(PIV)is an essential method in experimental fluid dynamics.In recent years,the development of deep learning‐based methods has inspired new ap-proaches to tackle the PIV problem,which considerably improves the accuracy of PIV.However,the supervised learning of PIV is driven by large volumes of data with ground truth information.Therefore,the authors consider unsupervised PIV methods.There has been some work on unsupervised PIV,but they are not nearly as effective as supervised learning PIV.The authors try to improve the effectiveness and accuracy of unsupervised PIV by adding classical PIV methods and physical constraints.In this paper,the authors propose an unsupervised PIV method combined with the cross‐correlation method and divergence‐free constraint,which obtains better performance than other unsupervised PIV methods.The authors compare some classical PIV methods and some deep learning methods,such as LiteFlowNet,LiteFlowNet‐en,and UnLiteFlowNet with the authors’model on the synthetic dataset.Besides,the authors contrast the results of LiteFlowNet,UnLiteFlowNet and the authors’model on experimental particle images.As a result,the authors’model shows comparable performance with classical PIV methods as well as supervised PIV methods and outperforms the previous unsupervised PIV method in most flow cases.