Dual-sided composite mesh repair of hiatal hernia: Our experience and a review of the Chinese literature

AIM:To summarize our experience in the application of Crurasoft for antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia(HH)repair and to introduce the work of Chinese doctors on this topic.METHODS:Twenty-one patients underwent HH repair with Crurasoft reinforcement.Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)and HH-related symptoms including heartburn,regurgitation,chest pain,dysphagia,and abdominal pain were evaluated preoperatively and 6mo postoperatively.A patient survey was conducted by phone by one of the authors.Patients were asked about"recurrent reflux or heartburn"and"dysphagia".An internet-based Chinese literature search in this field was also performed.Data extracted from each study included:number of patients treated,hernia size,hiatorrhaphy,antireflux surgery,follow-up period,recurrence rate,and complications(especially dysphagia).RESULTS:There were 8 typeⅠ,10 typeⅡand 3 typeⅢHHs in this group.Mean operative time was 119.29min(range 80-175 min).Intraoperatively,length and width of the hiatal orifice were measured,(4.33±0.84and 2.85±0.85 cm,respectively).Thirteen and eight Nissen and Toupet fundoplications were performed,respectively.The intraoperative complication rate was9.52%.Despite dysphagia,GERD-related symptoms improved significantly compared with those before surgery.The recurrence rate was 0%during the 6-mo follow-up period,and long-term follow-up disclosed a recurrence rate of 4.76%with a mean period of 16.28mo.Eight patients developed new-onset dysphagia.The Chinese literature review identified 12 papers with213 patients.The overall recurrence rate was 1.88%.There was no esophageal erosion and the rate of dysphagia ranged from 0%to 24%.CONCLUSION:The use of Crurasoft mesh for HH repair results in satisfactory symptom control with a low recurrence rate.Postoperative dysphagia continues to be an issue,and requires more research to reduce its incidence.

Changes of Ghrelin/GOAT axis and m TOR pathway in the hypothalamus after sleeve gastrectomy in obese type-2 diabetes rats

AIM To examine the changes of the ghrelin/ghrelin O-acyltransferase(GOAT) axis and the mammalian target of rapamycin(m TOR) pathway in the hypothalamus after sleeve gastrectomy.METHODS A total of 30 obese type-2 diabetes Sprague-Dawley(SD) rats, 6 wk of age, fed with high-sugar and highfat fodder for 2 mo plus intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin were randomly divided into three groups: non-operation group(S0 group, n = 10), sham operation group(Sh group, n = 10) and sleeve gastrectomy group(SG group, n = 10). Data of body mass, food intake, oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT), acylated ghrelin(AG) and total ghrelin(TG) were collected and measured at the first day(when the rats were 6 wk old), preoperative day 3 and postoperative week 8. The m RNA expression of preproghrelin, GOAT and neuropeptide Y(NPY), and protein expression of ghrelin, GOAT, GHSR and the m TOR pathway(p-Akt, p-m TOR and p-S6) were measured in the hypothalamus.RESULTS SG can significantly improve metabolic symptoms by reducing body mass and food intake. The obese rats showed lower serum TG levels and no change in AG, but the ratio of AG/TG was increased. When compared with the S0 and Sh groups, the SG group showed decreased TG(1482.03 ± 26.55, 1481.49 ± 23.30 and 1206.63 ± 52.02 ng/L, respectively, P < 0.05), but unchanged AG(153.06 ± 13.74, 155.37 ± 19.30 and 144.44 ± 16.689 ng/L, respectively, P > 0.05). As a result, the ratio of AG/TG further increased in the SG group(0.103 ± 0.009, 0.105 ± 0.013 and 0.12 ± 0.016, respectively, P < 0.05). When compared with the S0 group, SG suppressed m RNA and protein levels of preproghrelin(0.63 ± 0.12 vs 0.5 ± 0.11, P < 0.05) and GOAT(0.96 ± 0.09 vs 0.87 ± 0.08, P < 0.05), but did not change NPY m RNA expression(0.61 ± 0.04 vs 0.65 ± 0.07, P > 0.05) in the hypothalamus. The protein levels of p-Akt, p-m TOR and p-S6 were higher in the SG group, which indicated that the hypothalamic m TOR pathway was activated after SG at the postoperative week 8. CONCLUSION The reduction of ghrelin expression and activation of the m TOR pathway might have opposite effects on food intake, as SG improves obesity and T2 DM.

Is laparoscopy equal to laparotomy in detecting and treating small bowel injuries in a porcine model?

AIM: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for diagnosing and treating small bowel injuries (SBIs) in a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty-eight female pigs were anesthetized and laid in the left recumbent position. The SBI model was established by shooting at the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. The pigs were then randomized into either the laparotomy group or the laparoscopy group. All pigs underwent routine exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy to evaluate the abdominal injuries, particularly the types, sites, and numbers of SBIs. Traditional open surgery or therapeutic laparoscopy was then performed. All pigs were kept alive within the observational period (postoperative 72 h). The postoperative recovery of each pig was carefully observed. RESULTS: The vital signs of all pigs were stable within 1-2 h after shooting and none of the pigs died from gunshot wounds or SBIs immediately. The SBI model was successfully established in all pigs and definitively diagnosed with single or multiple SBIs either by exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy. Compared with exploratory laparotomy, laparoscopy took a significantly longer time for diagnosis (41.27 ± 12.04 min vs 27.64 ± 13.32 min, P = 0.02), but the time for therapeutic laparoscopy was similar to that of open surgery. The length of incision was significantly reduced in the laparoscopy group compared with the laparotomy group (5.27 ± 1.86 cm vs 15.73 ± 1.06 cm, P < 0.01). In the final post-mortem examination 72 h after surgery, both laparotomy and laparoscopy offered a definitive diagnosis with no missed injuries. Postoperative complications occurred in four cases (three following laparotomy and one following laparoscopy, P = 0.326). The average recovery period for bowel function, vital appearance, and food re-intake after laparoscopy was 10.36 ± 4.72 h, 14.91 ± 3.14 h, and 15.00 ± 7.11 h, respectively. All of these were significantly shorter than after laparotomy (21.27 ± 10.17 h, P = 0.004; 27.82 ± 9.61 h, P < 0.001; and 24.55 ± 9.72 h, respectively, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy offers equivalent efficacy for diagnosing and treating SBIs, and reduces postoperative complications as well as recovery period.