Nedaplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Carboplatin/Gemcitabine in Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin/gemcitabine （NG） and carboplatin/gemcitabine （CG） in the management of untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods： Sixty-two patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC were recruited between June 2006 and November 2007. Subjects were randomly assigned to the NG arm （n=30） and the CG arm （n=32）. Only patients （24 and 25 in the NG and CG arms, respectively） who completed 〉2 chemotherapy cycles were included in the data analysis. The primary outcome measure was the objective response rate （ORR）. The secondary outcome measures included progression-free survival （PFS）, overall survival （OS） and adverse events. Results： There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy measures （ORR, P=0.305; median PFS, P=0.298, median OS, P=0.961） or in the major adverse events （grade 3/4 neutropenia, P=0.666; grade 3/4 anemia, P=0.263; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, P=0.222） between the two treatment arms. However, there was a trend towards higher ORR （37.5% vs. 24.0%）, longer PFS （6.0 vs. 5.0 months）, and less adverse events in the NG arm. Conclusion： NG regimen seems to be superior over CG regimen for advance NSCLS, but further investigation is needed to validate this superiority.

PD-L1表达指导的信迪利单抗与帕博利珠单抗联合或不联合含铂双药化疗治疗未经治晚期非小细胞肺癌患者:一项2期随机对照试验(CTONG1901)

No direct comparison has been performed between different programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitors for first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).The feasibility of using PD-L1-expression-guided immunotherapy remains unknown.In this open-label,phase 2 study(NCT04252365),patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations were randomized(1:1)to receive sintilimab or pembrolizumab monotherapy(PD-L1 expression≥50%),or sintilimab or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy(PD-L1 expression<50%).The sample size was calculated by optimal two-stage design.The primary endpoint was the objective response rate(ORR).The study included 71 patients(sintilimab arms,n=35;pembrolizumab arms,n=36)and met its primary endpoint,with a confirmed ORR of 51.4%(18/35)in the sintilimab arms.The confirmed ORR(95%confidence interval)was 46.2%(19.2%,74.9%)and 42.9%(17.7%,71.1%)for patients treated with sintilimab and pembrolizumab monotherapy;and 54.5%(32.2%,75.6%)and 45.4%(24.4%,67.8%)for those treated with sintilimab-and pembrolizumab-based combination therapies.The median progression-free survival was6.9 versus 8.1 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients,respectively,in which it was 7.6 versus 11.0 months in monotherapy and 7.4 versus 7.1 months in combination therapies.The median overall survival was 14.9 versus 21.3 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients,respectively,in which it was 14.9 versus 22.6 months in monotherapy and 14.7 versus 17.3 months in combination therapies.Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with safety outcomes of monotherapy and combination therapy in previous phase III studies.However,the incidence of rash was higher with sintilimab than pembrolizumab monotherapy.This is the first prospective phase 2 study to directly compare two anti-PD-1 antibodies as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC.Sintilimab was efficacious and well-tolerated irrespective of PD-L1 expression level in patients with advanced NSCLC and had similar efficacy and safety to pembrolizumab.

The spatiotemporal evolution of EGFR C797S mutation in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer:opportunities for third-generation EGFR inhibitors re-challenge

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated impressive activity in EGFR T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressed from prior EGFR-TKIs (1,2)However, resistance inevitably occurred after approximately 10 months of treatment.