期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
基于血清学指标的联合模型诊断代偿期肝硬化轻微型肝性脑病的价值 被引量:3
1
作者 刘尚豪 祖红梅 +65 位作者 黄燕 郭小青 向慧玲 党彤 李晓燕 严兆兰 李雅静 刘菲 孙佳 宋瑞欣 闫俊卿 叶青 王晶 孟宪梅 王海英 江振宇 黄磊 孟繁平 张国 王文娟 杨少奇 呼圣娟 阮继刚 雷创 汪清海 田宏玲 郑琦 李异玲 王宁宁 崔会鹏 王滟萌 瞿章书 袁敏 刘益军 陈颖 夏玉香 刘娅媛 刘莹 曲素萱 陶弘 石瑞春 杨小婷 金丹 苏丹 杨永峰 叶伟 刘娜 唐荣瑜 张权 刘琴 邹高亮 李子月 赵彩彦 赵倩 张清格 高华方 孟涛 李婕 吴卫华 王健 杨传龙 吕卉 刘川 王福生 福军亮 祁小龙 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期52-61,共10页
目的探讨血清学指标对代偿期肝硬化轻微型肝性脑病(MHE)的诊断价值,构建基于血清学指标的联合模型并评估其对MHE的诊断价值。方法前瞻性、多中心研究。选取2021年10月至2022年8月来自我国15个省(自治区、直辖市)的23家医院就诊的代偿期... 目的探讨血清学指标对代偿期肝硬化轻微型肝性脑病(MHE)的诊断价值,构建基于血清学指标的联合模型并评估其对MHE的诊断价值。方法前瞻性、多中心研究。选取2021年10月至2022年8月来自我国15个省(自治区、直辖市)的23家医院就诊的代偿期肝硬化患者263例。收集患者临床资料及实验室检查结果,并计算终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分。使用基线血氨测量值/正常参考值上限(AMM-ULN)集中校正各中心血氨测量结果,以我国《肝硬化肝性脑病诊疗指南》标准,数字连接试验-A、数字符号试验均异常作为诊断MHE的标准。基于R语言caret包将患者随机(7∶3)分为训练集(n=185)和验证集(n=78)。通过Logistic回归构建诊断MHE的联合模型;受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验及校准曲线图评估诊断性能,并用Bootstrap法(n=200)进行内部验证;Delong检验比较AUC之间的差异。结果训练集中,MHE占37.8%(70/185),MHE组AMM-ULN、白蛋白、血小板、碱性磷酸酶、国际标准化比值、终末期肝病模型评分以及教育年限与无MHE组比较,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,AMM-ULN(OR=1.78,95%CI 1.05~3.14,P=0.038)和MELD评分(OR=1.11,95%CI 1.04~1.20,P=0.002)是MHE的独立危险因素,AUC分别为0.663和0.625。联合AMM-ULN、MELD评分和教育年限的联合模型诊断MHE的AUC为0.755,特异度和敏感度分别为85.2%和55.7%。Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验表明模型具有较好的校准度(P=0.733),联合模型内部验证AUC为0.752。Delong检验显示联合模型诊断效能优于单独使用血氨(P=0.020)和MELD评分(P=0.003)。验证集中,联合模型诊断MHE的AUC为0.794,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验显示有较好的校准度(P=0.841)。结论基于AMM-ULN、MELD评分和教育年限的联合模型可提高对MHE的诊断价值。 展开更多
关键词 肝性脑病 肝硬化 血氨 终末期肝病模型评分 诊断模型
原文传递
Prevalence and risk factors for minimal hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients with different etiologies
2
作者 Xiaoyan Li Shanghao Liu +37 位作者 Huiling Xiang Qingge Zhang Ying Guo Hongmei Zu Jing Wang Jiaojian Lv Xiaoning Zhang Fanping Meng Jiahuan Li Jie Li yangzhen Bianba Jia Shang Guo Zhang Fei Liu Zhaowei Tong Chuang Lei Wei Ye Qiaohua yang Ningning Wang Ying Song Wei Fu Ziyue Li Yanjing Gao Yongping Zhang Jiafang Chen Caiyun Wu Qi Zheng Fang Wang Jiali Yu Lianjie Lin chuanlong yang Xiaoting yang Xiaomin Ye Xiangmei Wang Xuelan Zhao Xiaolong Qi Fusheng Wang Junliang Fu 《Portal Hypertension & Cirrhosis》 2023年第4期171-180,共10页
Aims:Minimal hepatic encephalopathy(MHE)significantly affects the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis.This study was performed to determine whether there is a difference in the prevalence of MHE among patients with c... Aims:Minimal hepatic encephalopathy(MHE)significantly affects the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis.This study was performed to determine whether there is a difference in the prevalence of MHE among patients with cirrhosis of different etiologies and whether the etiology directly influences the occurrence of MHE.Methods:This multicenter,cross-sectional study enrolled 1879 patients with confirmed cirrhosis at 40 hospitals from October 25,2021,to January 10,2023(Trial registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/[NCT05140837]).The patients'demographics,etiologies of cirrhosis,and laboratory test results were collected.The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score(PHES)was determined in all patients to screen for MHE.Multivariate logistic analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for MHE.Results:In total,736 patients with cirrhosis were analyzed.The prevalence of MHE was 42.0%(n=309).The primary etiology among all patients was hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related cirrhosis(71.9%[529/736]).The prevalence of MHE was significantly higher in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis(57.1%[40/70])than in those with HBV-related cirrhosis(40.6%[215/529],p=0.009)or hepatitis C virus(HCV)-related cirrhosis(38.2%[26/68],p=0.026).Age(odds ratio[OR],1.042;95%confidence interval[CI],1.024-1.059;p<0.001),duration of education(OR,0.935;95%CI,0.899-0.971;p=0.001),etiology(OR,1.740;95%CI,1.028-2.945;p=0.039),and high MELD-Na scores(OR,1.038;95%CI,1.009-1.067;p=0.009)were independent risk factors for MHE.When patients with cirrhosis of different etiologies were analyzed separately,the results showed that age(OR,1.035;95%CI,1.014-1.057;p=0.001)and duration of education(OR,0.924;95%CI,0.883-0.966;p=0.001)were risk factors for MHE among patients with HBV-related cirrhosis,whereas age(OR,1.138;95%CI,1.033-1.254;p=0.009)and creatinine concentration(OR,16.487;95%CI,1.113-244.160;p=0.042)were risk factors for MHE in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis.No risk factors for MHE were found in patients with autoimmune cirrhosis.For patients with alcoholic cirrhosis,the platelet count(OR,1.014;95%CI,1.000-1.027;p=0.045)was a risk factor for MHE.The PHES subtest results were inconsistent among patients who had MHE with cirrhosis of different etiologies.Patients with HBV-related cirrhosis performed better on Number Connection Test B and the serial dotting test than those with alcoholic cirrhosis(p=0.007 and p<0.001),better on Number Connection Test B than those with HCV-related cirrhosis(p=0.020),and better on the line tracing test than those with autoimmune cirrhosis(p=0.037).Conclusion:The etiology of cirrhosis affected the prevalence of MHE and risk factors for MHE.The domains of major cognitive impairment varied among patients with cirrhosis of different etiologies.Further studies are required to verify these findings. 展开更多
关键词 ETIOLOGY liver cirrhosis minimal hepatic encephalopathy psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score risk factors
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部