AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin and compare it to an uptitration of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients who have inadequate control with m...AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin and compare it to an uptitration of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients who have inadequate control with metformin monotherapy.METHODS:Eligible patients were randomized to receive vildagliptin 100 mg qd or metformin(500 mg qd for 2 wk and then 500 mg bid) added to open label me tformin 500 mg bid for the 24 wk.The primary endpoi nt was baseline to endpoint hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) change.RESULTS:The adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at the 24th wk was-0.51% in the vildagliptin/metformin group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.4%) and-0.37% in the metformin monothera py group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.3%).The mean diffe rence was-0.14% with 95% Confidence Interval(-0.24%,-0.05%).As non-inf e riority(margin of 0.4%) was achieved,a test for superiority was performed.This test showed statistically significant superiority of the combination over monotherapy group(P = 0.002).Gastrointestinal(GI) adverse events were signif icantly more frequent in the metformin group than the combin ation group(21.0% vs 15.4%,P = 0.032).CONCLUSION:In patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin up to 1000 mg daily,the addition of vildagliptin 100 mg daily achieved larger HbA1c reduction with fewer GI events than with increa sing the metformin dose.展开更多
AIM:To assess the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin/pioglitazone combination therapy in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).METHODS:This was a post hoc analysis in Korean patients,from a 24-wk,random...AIM:To assess the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin/pioglitazone combination therapy in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).METHODS:This was a post hoc analysis in Korean patients,from a 24-wk,randomized,active-controlled,double-blind,parallel-group,multicenter study.Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 80 years,drug naive,and had been diagnosed with T2DM [hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c):7.5-11.0 and fasting plasma glucose(FPG):【 270 mg/dL(【 15 mmol/L)].Patients were randomized(1:1:1:1) to receive the vildagliptin/pioglitazone comb ination at 100/30 mg q.d.(high-dose) or 50/15 mg q.d.(low-dose),vildagliptin 100 mg q.d.,or pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.monotherapies.The primary outcome measure was change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint.RESULTS:The distribution of baseline demographic and clinical parameters was well balanced between treatment groups.The overall mean age,body mass index,HbA1c,FPG,and duration of disease were 50.8 years,24.6 kg/m2,8.6,10.1 mmol/L,and 2.2 years,respectively.Adjusted mean changes(± standard error) in HbA1c from baseline(~8.7) to week 24 endpoint were-2.03 ± 0.16(high-dose,N = 34),-1.88 ± 0.15(low-dose,N = 34),-1.31 ± 0.21(vildagliptin,N = 36),and-1.52 ± 0.16(pioglitazone,N = 36).The high-dose combination therapy demonstrated greater efficacy than monotherapies [vildagliptin(P = 0.029) and pioglitazone(P = 0.027)].Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c 【 7 and ≤ 6.5 was the highest in the high-dose group(76 and 68) followed by low-dose(58 and 47),vildagliptin(59 and 37),and pioglitazone(53 and 28) groups.The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable.CONCLUSION:In Korean patients,first-line treatment with high-dose combination therapy improved glycemic control compared to pioglitazone and vildagliptin monotherapies,consistent with results published for the overall study population.展开更多
基金Supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, NC-T00396357
文摘AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin and compare it to an uptitration of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients who have inadequate control with metformin monotherapy.METHODS:Eligible patients were randomized to receive vildagliptin 100 mg qd or metformin(500 mg qd for 2 wk and then 500 mg bid) added to open label me tformin 500 mg bid for the 24 wk.The primary endpoi nt was baseline to endpoint hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) change.RESULTS:The adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at the 24th wk was-0.51% in the vildagliptin/metformin group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.4%) and-0.37% in the metformin monothera py group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.3%).The mean diffe rence was-0.14% with 95% Confidence Interval(-0.24%,-0.05%).As non-inf e riority(margin of 0.4%) was achieved,a test for superiority was performed.This test showed statistically significant superiority of the combination over monotherapy group(P = 0.002).Gastrointestinal(GI) adverse events were signif icantly more frequent in the metformin group than the combin ation group(21.0% vs 15.4%,P = 0.032).CONCLUSION:In patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin up to 1000 mg daily,the addition of vildagliptin 100 mg daily achieved larger HbA1c reduction with fewer GI events than with increa sing the metformin dose.
基金Supported by the Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
文摘AIM:To assess the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin/pioglitazone combination therapy in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).METHODS:This was a post hoc analysis in Korean patients,from a 24-wk,randomized,active-controlled,double-blind,parallel-group,multicenter study.Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 80 years,drug naive,and had been diagnosed with T2DM [hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c):7.5-11.0 and fasting plasma glucose(FPG):【 270 mg/dL(【 15 mmol/L)].Patients were randomized(1:1:1:1) to receive the vildagliptin/pioglitazone comb ination at 100/30 mg q.d.(high-dose) or 50/15 mg q.d.(low-dose),vildagliptin 100 mg q.d.,or pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.monotherapies.The primary outcome measure was change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint.RESULTS:The distribution of baseline demographic and clinical parameters was well balanced between treatment groups.The overall mean age,body mass index,HbA1c,FPG,and duration of disease were 50.8 years,24.6 kg/m2,8.6,10.1 mmol/L,and 2.2 years,respectively.Adjusted mean changes(± standard error) in HbA1c from baseline(~8.7) to week 24 endpoint were-2.03 ± 0.16(high-dose,N = 34),-1.88 ± 0.15(low-dose,N = 34),-1.31 ± 0.21(vildagliptin,N = 36),and-1.52 ± 0.16(pioglitazone,N = 36).The high-dose combination therapy demonstrated greater efficacy than monotherapies [vildagliptin(P = 0.029) and pioglitazone(P = 0.027)].Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c 【 7 and ≤ 6.5 was the highest in the high-dose group(76 and 68) followed by low-dose(58 and 47),vildagliptin(59 and 37),and pioglitazone(53 and 28) groups.The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable.CONCLUSION:In Korean patients,first-line treatment with high-dose combination therapy improved glycemic control compared to pioglitazone and vildagliptin monotherapies,consistent with results published for the overall study population.