AIM： To analyze the effectiveness of the endoscopic therapy and to identify prognostic factors for recurrent bleeding. METHODS： Retrospective study of patients with gas- trointestinal bleeding secondary to Dieulafoy...AIM： To analyze the effectiveness of the endoscopic therapy and to identify prognostic factors for recurrent bleeding. METHODS： Retrospective study of patients with gas- trointestinal bleeding secondary to Dieulafoy＇s lesion （DL） from 2005 to 2011. We analyzed the demographic characteristics of the patients, risk factors for gastro- intestinal bleeding, endoscopic findings, characteristics of the endoscopic treatment, and the recurrence of bleeding. We included cases in which endoscopy de- scribed a lesion compatible with Dieulafoy. We exclud- ed patients who had potentially bleeding lesions such as angiodysplasia in other areas or had undergone other gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. RESULTS： Twenty-nine patients with DL were identi- fied. Most of them were men with an average age of 71.5 years. Fifty-five percent of the patients received antiaggregatory or anticoagulant therapy. The most common location for DL was the stomach （51.7%）. The main type of bleeding was oozing in 65.5% of cases. In 27.6% of cases, there was arterial （spurting） bleeding, and 6.9% of the patients presented with an adherent clot. A single endoscopic treatment was ap- plied to nine patients （31%）, eight of them with adren- aline and one with argon, while 69% of the patients received combined treatment. Six patients （20.7%） presented with recurrent bleeding at a median of 4 d after endoscopy （interquartile range = 97.75）. Within these six patients, the new endoscopic treatment ob- tained a therapeutic success of 100%. The presence of arterial bleeding at endoscopy was associated with a higher recurrence rate for bleeding （50% vs 33.3% for other type of bleeding） rP = 0.024, odds ratio （OR） = 8.5, 95% CI = 1.13-63.87]. The use of combined en- doscopic treatment prevented the recurrence of bleed- ing （10% vs 44.4% of single treatment） （P = 0.034, OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.19-0.99）. CONCLUSION： Endoscopic treatment of DL is safe and effective. Adrenaline monotherapy and arterial （spurting） bleeding are associated with a high rate of bleeding recurrence.展开更多
文摘AIM： To analyze the effectiveness of the endoscopic therapy and to identify prognostic factors for recurrent bleeding. METHODS： Retrospective study of patients with gas- trointestinal bleeding secondary to Dieulafoy＇s lesion （DL） from 2005 to 2011. We analyzed the demographic characteristics of the patients, risk factors for gastro- intestinal bleeding, endoscopic findings, characteristics of the endoscopic treatment, and the recurrence of bleeding. We included cases in which endoscopy de- scribed a lesion compatible with Dieulafoy. We exclud- ed patients who had potentially bleeding lesions such as angiodysplasia in other areas or had undergone other gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. RESULTS： Twenty-nine patients with DL were identi- fied. Most of them were men with an average age of 71.5 years. Fifty-five percent of the patients received antiaggregatory or anticoagulant therapy. The most common location for DL was the stomach （51.7%）. The main type of bleeding was oozing in 65.5% of cases. In 27.6% of cases, there was arterial （spurting） bleeding, and 6.9% of the patients presented with an adherent clot. A single endoscopic treatment was ap- plied to nine patients （31%）, eight of them with adren- aline and one with argon, while 69% of the patients received combined treatment. Six patients （20.7%） presented with recurrent bleeding at a median of 4 d after endoscopy （interquartile range = 97.75）. Within these six patients, the new endoscopic treatment ob- tained a therapeutic success of 100%. The presence of arterial bleeding at endoscopy was associated with a higher recurrence rate for bleeding （50% vs 33.3% for other type of bleeding） rP = 0.024, odds ratio （OR） = 8.5, 95% CI = 1.13-63.87]. The use of combined en- doscopic treatment prevented the recurrence of bleed- ing （10% vs 44.4% of single treatment） （P = 0.034, OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.19-0.99）. CONCLUSION： Endoscopic treatment of DL is safe and effective. Adrenaline monotherapy and arterial （spurting） bleeding are associated with a high rate of bleeding recurrence.
