Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy

AIM: To study the significance of cap-fitted colonoscopy in improving cecal intubation time and polyp detection rate. METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted from March 2008 to February 2009 in a tertiary referral hospital at Sydney. The primary end point was cecal intubation time and the secondary endpoint was polyp detection rate. Consecutive cases of total colonoscopy over a 1-year period were recruited. Randomization into either standard colonoscopy (SC) or cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) was performed after consent was obtained. For cases randomized to CAC, one of the three sizes of cap was used: D-201-15004 (with a diameter of 15.3 mm), D-201-14304 (14.6 mm) and D-201-12704 (13.0 mm). All of these caps were produced by Olympus Medical Systems, Japan. Independent predictors for faster cecal time and better polyp detection rate were also determined from this study. RESULTS: There were 200 cases in each group. There was no signif icant difference in terms of demographic characteristics between the two groups. CAC, when compared to the SC group, had no signif icant difference in terms of cecal intubation rate (96.0% vs 97.0%, P = 0.40) and time (9.94 ± 7.05 min vs 10.34 ± 6.82 min, P = 0.21), or polyp detection rate (32.8% vs 31.3%, P = 0.75). On the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in terms of cecal intubation time by trainees (88.1% vs 84.8%, P = 0.40), ileal intubation rate (82.5% vs 79.0%, P = 0.38) or total colonoscopy time (23.24 ± 13.95 min vs 22.56 ± 9.94 min, P = 0.88). On multivariate analysis, the independent determinants of faster cecal time were consultant-performed procedures (P < 0.001), male patients (P < 0.001), non-usage of hyoscine (P < 0.001) and better bowel preparation (P = 0.01). The determinants of better polyp detection rate were older age (P < 0.001), no history of previous abdominal surgery (P = 0.04), patients not having esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same setting (P = 0.003), trainee-performed procedures (P = 0.01), usage of hyoscine (P = 0.01) and procedures performed for polyp follow-up (P = 0.01). The limitations of the study were that it was a single-center experience, no blinding was possible, and there were a large number of endoscopists. CONCLUSION: CAC did not signif icantly different from SC in term of cecal intubation time and polyp detection rate.

Higher infliximab and adalimumab trough levels are associated with fistula healing in patients with fistulising perianal Crohn’s disease

BACKGROUND Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors,including infliximab and adalimumab,are effective medical treatments for perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease(CD),but not all patients achieve fistula healing.AIM To determine the correlation between perianal fistula healing and closure with infliximab and adalimumab trough levels.METHODS In this multicentre retrospective study conducted across four tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centres in Australia,we identified CD patients with perianal fistulae on maintenance infliximab or adalimumab who had a trough level within twelve weeks of clinical assessment.Data collected included demographics,serum infliximab and adalimumab trough levels(mg/L)within 12 wk before or after their most recent clinical assessment and concomitant medical or surgical therapy.The primary outcome was fistula healing,defined as cessation in fistula drainage.The secondary outcome was fistula closure,defined as healing and closure of all external fistula openings.Differences between patients who did or did not achieve fistula healing were compared using the chi-square test,t test or Mann-Whitney U test.RESULTS One hundred and fourteen patients(66 infliximab,48 adalimumab)were included.Forty-eight(72.7%)patients on maintenance infliximab achieved fistula healing and 18(27.3%)achieved fistula closure.Thirty-seven(77%)patients on maintenance adalimumab achieved fistula healing and 17(35.4%)achieved fistula closure.Patients who achieved fistula healing had significantly higher infliximab and adalimumab trough levels than patients who did not[infliximab:6.4(3.8-9.5)vs 3.0(0.3-6.2)mg/L,P=0.003;adalimumab:9.2(6.5-12.0)vs 5.4(2.5-8.3)mg/L,P=0.004].For patients on infliximab,fistula healing was associated with lower rates of detectable anti-infliximab antibodies and younger age.For patients on adalimumab,fistula healing was associated with higher rates of combination therapy with an immunomodulator.Serum trough levels for patients with and without fistula closure were not significantly different for infliximab[6.9(4.3-10.2)vs 5.5(2.5-8.3)mg/L,P=0.105]or adalimumab[10.0(6.6-12.0)vs 7.8(4.2-10.0)mg/L,P=0.083].CONCLUSION Higher maintenance infliximab and adalimumab trough levels are associated with perianal fistula healing in CD.