Post-operative computed tomography scan – reliable tool for quality assessment of complete mesocolic excision

BACKGROUND Quality control in colon cancer surgery is an ongoing debate ever since standardization proved to be highly efficient in improving survival in rectal cancer. Complete mesocolic excision(CME) is widely acclaimed as the new goldstandard in colon cancer resections, thus it is imperative to establish quality criteria of CME in order to make it easily understood and verified by surgeons worldwide. One simple and reproducible tool could be the measurement of arterial stumps postoperatively and a straightforward way to test its reliability is to test it in a comparative study between CME and non-CME surgery.AIM To validate arterial stump measurement as a surgical quality tool by comparing CME with conventional radical colectomies.METHODS This was a retrospective study, carried out on a prospective database. We collected data from two groups of patients, divided according to standard CME with D2 central vascular ligation(group A) and non-standardized surgery(group B). The two groups were compared with regard to the arterial stump length after right-and left-sided colectomies for colon cancer. The actual stump lengths of the ileocolic artery(ICA) and inferior mesenteric artery(IMA) were compared with their theoretical best D2 position of predicted ligation levels(D2 PLLs) for calculating the potential for improvement. Measurements on follow-up computed tomography scans were carried out by three observers. Pathological data were recorded(specimen length, lymph node yield) and correlated with stump length.RESULTS We analysed 58 colectomies. The stump lengths(mean ± SD) in group A were16.97 ± 4.77 mm for ICA and 31.70 ± 15.71 mm for IMA, whereas group B had 49.93 ± 20.29 mm for ICA and 67.24 ± 28.71 mm for IMA. Shorter lengths were obtained in group A, by a mean difference of 35.66 mm(χ~2 = 27.38, P < 0.001),which was significant for all types of colectomies. Except for a 5.85 ± 4.71 mm difference for right colectomies, all the ligations from group A significantly reached their potential height(0.26 ± 12.18 mm from D2 PLL; χ~2 = 0.005, P = 0.944).Apart from three left colectomies, group B failed to reach D2 PLL, by a mean difference of 32.14 ± 26.15 mm(χ~2 = 21.77, P < 0.001). The calculated improvement potentials were significantly shorter in group A than in group B, by a mean of 31.88 mm(χ~2= 22.13, P < 0.001). The large spread of results in group B showed that there is significant variability(P = 0.004) when compared to standard surgery. Significant correlations were found between stump length, specimen length and number of lymph nodes(P = 0.018 and P = 0.008 respectively). No statistical difference was found between observers' measurements(P = 0.866).CONCLUSION Arterial stump monitoring is a significant step in defining surgical quality, as longer stumps contain residual mesocolic tissue and correlate with major prognostic factors.

Nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis in an ulcerative colitis patient-a putative adverse reaction to mesalazine:A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Lung and airway involvement in inflammatory bowel disease are increasingly frequently reported either as an extraintestinal manifestation or as an adverse effect of therapy.CASE SUMMARY We report a case of a patient with ulcerative colitis controlled under mesalazine treatment who presented with chronic cough and hemoptysis.Chest computed tomography and bronchoscopy findings supported tracheal involvement in ulcerative colitis;pathology examination demonstrated an unusual eosinophilrich inflammatory pattern,and together with clinical data,a nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis diagnosis was formulated.Full recovery was observed within days of mesalazine discontinuation.CONCLUSION Mesalazine-induced eosinophilic respiratory disorders have been previously reported,generally involving the lung parenchyma.To the best of our knowledge,this is the first report of mesalamine-induced eosinophilic involvement in the upper airway.