Le Corbusier’s urbanism is routinely met with a backlash of criticism,which often overlooks the complexity of his work.There is a tendency to focus on the characteristics of his proposal for Paris in 1925 or on the i...Le Corbusier’s urbanism is routinely met with a backlash of criticism,which often overlooks the complexity of his work.There is a tendency to focus on the characteristics of his proposal for Paris in 1925 or on the ideas of CIAM’s Athens Charter.However,such affirmations ignore the conceptual and qualitative evolution of his urban proposals.In this sense,the research hypothesis is that Corbusian urban models go beyond the Plan Voisin,diffused by urban planning theories as the unique paradigm of his urban ideas.Through analysis and characterisation of the inner-city urban plans of Le Corbusier,this report seeks to demonstrate the existence of other models and compares them to those often showcased in the partial examination of Le Corbusier’s urbanism.The following parameters will be analysed:(1)population densities and areas for(2)buildings,(3)vehicles,and(4)pedestrians.The results of this research indicate the need to parameterise and analyse Le Corbusier’s cities beyond a single case to demonstrate the diversity and evolution of his urbanistic work.This process seeks to dissipate the common view that falsely extrapolates ideas of his urban planning,largely that of his first proposal,for Paris.展开更多
基金This research was funded by the Ministry of Science,Innovation and Universities of the Government of Spain(FPU17/03701)supported by the University of SevilleAdditionally,this article has been funded by the Grants for Research Internationalisation IUACC 2020 from the Research and Transfer Plan of the University of Seville[Ayudas a la Internacionalizacion de la Investigacion IUACC 2020 del Plan Propio de Investigacion y Transferencia,Universidad de Sevilla].
文摘Le Corbusier’s urbanism is routinely met with a backlash of criticism,which often overlooks the complexity of his work.There is a tendency to focus on the characteristics of his proposal for Paris in 1925 or on the ideas of CIAM’s Athens Charter.However,such affirmations ignore the conceptual and qualitative evolution of his urban proposals.In this sense,the research hypothesis is that Corbusian urban models go beyond the Plan Voisin,diffused by urban planning theories as the unique paradigm of his urban ideas.Through analysis and characterisation of the inner-city urban plans of Le Corbusier,this report seeks to demonstrate the existence of other models and compares them to those often showcased in the partial examination of Le Corbusier’s urbanism.The following parameters will be analysed:(1)population densities and areas for(2)buildings,(3)vehicles,and(4)pedestrians.The results of this research indicate the need to parameterise and analyse Le Corbusier’s cities beyond a single case to demonstrate the diversity and evolution of his urbanistic work.This process seeks to dissipate the common view that falsely extrapolates ideas of his urban planning,largely that of his first proposal,for Paris.
